Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Reform/proposed guidelines
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Good article nominationseditWikipedia:Good articles is a list of articles considered to be of good standard but which are not featured article quality. This page provides a list of articles which have been nominated for consideration for good article status and instructions for nominators and reviewers. Articles can be nominated by anyone, and reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article. |
How to nominate an articleeditIf you believe an article meets the good article criteria you may nominate it below. Before nominating your first article, you may want to read the guide for nominating good articles for extra hints and tips. The nomination process:
Note that it may take more than a few weeks for your nomination to be reviewed, as this page tends to have a large backlog. If you are are a registered user, you can help by reviewing other articles. |
Nomination categoriesedit |
How to review an articleeditThe Good Articles review process is an open and collaborative process that takes place over a minimum time period of three (3) days, to allow as many editors as possible to comment on it.
Review carefully — see Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles for more suggestions. You may also ask for the advice of a mentor. |
PasseditOnce at least three (3) days has elapsed, or three (3) reviewers agree that the article meets the Good article criteria:
|
FaileditOnce at least three (3) days has elapsed, or three (3) reviewers agree that the article does not meet the Good article criteria:
|
|