Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Pulmonology task force
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Medicine/Pulmonology task force page. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Please help improve the page on Breathing Gas
editThe Wikipedia page on Breathing gas needs improvement from medical and therapeutic point of view. 2405:204:4421:E901:25D0:2F5D:179A:B58B (talk) 10:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
editHello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject COVID-19
editI've created WikiProject COVID-19 as a temporary or permanent WikiProject and invite editors to use this space for discussing ways to improve coverage of the ongoing 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Please bring your ideas to the project/talk page. Stay safe, ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:44, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COVID-19 in the United Kingdom timeline
editA discussion is taking place at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom#RfC_for_refactoring_of_"Timeline"_section about whether the timeline which is seen by some as being too long for the page should be moved to another article, cutdown or kept as it is. It needs a wider range of opinions to reach a consensus so feel free to add your view if you're interested. Llewee (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Problems at Pulmonary shunt
editThere are problems with the descriptions in section Pathphysiology. Some of the explanations appear to be wrong as they contradict simple fluid mechanics. I will do what I can, but do not have access to some of the sources cited. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 05:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)