Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Sam Manekshaw/archive 1

Reopen

Hi Mitchell, g'day. I request you to reopen this review as I have enough time to work on this. As it an archived A-class review, I am not sure how to work up with the things to put this in place. So please reopen and list this under A-class review. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: Reminder. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: Hi Harry, I have enough time for this now. Also I've addressed the outstanding comments from the previous review. I wanted to open the review, but I was confused between whether we should go for separate review page, or do on the same page? Please do the needful. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@Krishna Chaitanya Velaga: Sorry for the delay. I would suggest just re-nominating it, because that involves less paperwork, but if you want to re-open this review that's fine. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: Hi Harry, thanks for reply. I don't think I can do the regular nomination procedure i.e. using "A-class" parameter in the Project template, because that links to this page. Also if I go for a new nomination Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Sam Manekshaw 2, the MILHIST bot may get confused. Please suggest the best way. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hey Krishna, I've moved this out of the way. If you click the "currently undergoing" link on the talk page then follow the instructions as usual, everything should work normally. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)