Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Arrowman is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Arrowman is part of WikiProject Userboxes. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as part of the userboxes system. WikiProject Userboxes itself is an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles and templates related to the userbox system, used on many users' pages. We need all your help, so join in today!UserboxesWikipedia:WikiProject UserboxesTemplate:WikiProject UserboxesUserboxes articles
Protecting Wikipedia against copyright lawsuits is not being a tag nazi. Further comments by me may be found here, from your talk page. As an Eagle Scout I am sure you understand the importance of doing the right thing. --Durin14:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
The light/dark red letters make it hard to read the "OA". I honestly don't like it. Thanks for trying. It is appreciated.Rlevse15:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok, *shrug* lost me on that one. It's not my template; I was just trying to help. I think most people outside of OA would have no clue of the relevance of "WWW" to OA. Remove the image I put in from the template if you like. Just let me know if you do, so I can delete the image (as it's not going to be used anywhere else). --Durin17:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the current image is not bad, however, WWW would be OK, too. "OA" would be another alternative. As for the changing, I don't really mind. That's the wiki way. Eventually, we will probably have convergence on a consensus, or if not, we will find a way to "split the difference" and make everybody happy - like providing two versions. Since userboxes are mostly tangential to what is really happening here, I say that it's just great for people to have fun and look for improvements. NThurston19:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
I recommend that we use this area to try out new ideas, vote for ones you like, etc. It seems much more effective/appropriate than constantly fiddling with the actual template. Here are a few of the recent versions:NThurston19:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Seeing as the WWW design got a lot of support in the above comments, I tweaked the one here a bit and came up with a slightly different design which I've added to the bottom of the sandbox. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I like Thesquire's change, especially to white letters on red background. I'm adding a "split-the-difference" option for discussion purposes. NThurston15:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Here's my swing at a Template design, lemme know what y'all think. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mobius (talk • contribs) 13:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
