Main page   Discussion   Members   Assessment   Open tasks
Popular pages   Recognized content     Awards   Portal


GSST

edit

I have created the article Galileo Solar Space Telescope, and I'd like to invite everyone to contribute to it! I believe that the next step would be to include the technical material from the scientific articles (if someone here has deep knowledge to write it in layman terms), until the team behind the project receives the green lit to build the orbiter. Erick Soares3 (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ladakh Human Analogue Mission

edit

I created article Ladakh Human Analogue Mission I request everyone to review and contribute to it.Thanks. Edasf (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The content seems to be almost directly copied from the sources.
For example:
From the "Times of India": "The proposed research station would serve multiple purposes: Testing platform for space technologies, advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), engineering integration, human studies, and crew training for geological and astrobiological research"
From the article: "The projected research station would be used for geological and astrobiological research, human studies, crew training, advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), testing space technologies, and engineering integration"
"Testing platform for space technologies" becomes "testing space technologies"
"advancing Technology Readiness Levels (TRL)" remains the same, as does "engineering integration" and "human studies"
"crew training for geological and astrobiological research" is only divided into different sections. Redacted II (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
And, to be frank, it at times seems to be written without any regard for basic grammar rules: "Mission aims to make suitable interplanetary conditions for astronaut training." It also is promotional: "With an emphasis on sustainability (buzzword), resource efficiency (buzzword), and adaptability (buzzword) to challenging space conditions, AAKA Space Studio will explore innovative (in my opinion, nearly every article that uses this word without providing further details on what makes it innovative is promotional) habitat designs."
It's a good start, but it needs lots of copyedits. Titan(moon)003 (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Redirect Move Discussion

edit

The Redirect List of Super Heavies is being discussed here.

(The redirect is currently slated to eventually become a full article) Redacted II (talk) 15:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

UAP studies timeline

edit

If you think modern day UAP studies that went as far back as the middle of the 20th century (was then called ufology) is worth an independent timeline article, please go and support the Timeline of Ufology from being deleted and help extend and enrich its content. VaudevillianScientist (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Attitude determination and control

edit

Please see Talk:Spacecraft_attitude_control#Split_Attitude_determination. fgnievinski (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge request - Timeline of STS-121

edit

I've added a merger suggestion for Timeline of STS-121 into the main article (STS-121) since it seems redundant to me, especially given that there doesn't seem to be a separate page for the timeline for any other Space Shuttle mission. However since the timeline is quite long I haven't gone ahead with the merger myself & wanted to raise a discussion first. Slovborg (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move at Talk:Attitude (psychology)#Requested move 23 November 2024

edit
 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Attitude (psychology)#Requested move 23 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 18:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply