Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Cambridge/Archive 1

Archive 1

Featured-article drive

Instead of going for the main University of Cambridge page as our first featured-article drive, I'd suggest starting with one of the "smaller" pages. Perhaps one of the more modern colleges would allow us to get ourselves in practice, without the need to summarise centuries of history. Bluap 22:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

A reasonable idea - my thinking behind the main University article was that it's got a lot of information already, and the history article can quite happily live as a separate article that doesn't need to be complete (yet). I'm from Peterhouse but that doesn't really qualify as a 'newer' college! Does anyone have a fairly full set of information/references on any of the more modern colleges? Mrh30 06:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

History

For your information, I'm working on a page with the history of the university. Real life means that it'll be a few months before it's ready Bluap 22:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Looks like a good start, perhaps we could distribute work on sections around volunteers in order to speed up the article creation? Mrh30 06:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cambridge

Members of this WikiProject might be interested in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cambridge#Scope of this project, overlap with University of Cambridge WikiProject. Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Archive 1

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

University of Cambridge Page

I've spent some time changing the layout and order of the University of Cambridge article today. I'd welcome peer review on the order of sections, &c. I've also moved most of the stuff out of the miscellaneous heading - thanks to Mrh30 for pointing this out on the page - though more need to be done on this section. Comments please. A.C. Norman (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Further to last comment, I've just been to the editorial team's reviews page, and I noted that the article was last assessed on 11th Ovtober, 2007 (which was this version). I was thinking that, if the article were to be re-assessed now, it might make FA status. (Also, perusal of that list also leads me to think that other articles may also be raised on the scale upon reassessment). Comments? A.C. Norman (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Highly unlikely that it would cut it at the moment. It's not really anywhere near FA status just yet. If you read the Peer Review, you'll see some of the things that need fixing before we can relist it. Mrh30 (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree that it isn't at FA status yet. I would suggest that people lurk for a while on WP:FAC to see the comments that Featured Articles Candidates get, and try to apply those to the University of Cambridge page. Bluap (talk) 17:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for University of Cambridge

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Cambridge meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 1, of possible interest. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

And another one, just in case anyone is watching this page. the wub "?!" 11:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

RfC for WP:BOOSTER

There is a request for comment about whether or not WP:BOOSTER documents a standard consensus and good practice that all editors and school/college/university articles should follow as an official policy or guideline. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Cfd

There is a cfd for Category:Second wranglers currently going on here. Occuli (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:49, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

University of Cambridge GAR notice

University of Cambridge has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Meetup

FYI, the fourth Cambridge meetup will occur on the afternoon of Saturday 1 August. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup 14 November

Another Cambridge meetup is set for the afternoon of Saturday 14 November. Please contribute to the page and come along if you can. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:24, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD

People who visit this page may be interested in the AfD deletion discussion here.--Epeefleche (talk) 04:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Introducing Portal:University of Cambridge

Having recently got Portal:University of Oxford underway, I thought I'd start Portal:University of Cambridge. It needs more articles, pictures, DYKs etc, but hopefully there's enough to get things going. A few comments / suggestions, from a "dark blue" person:

1. I took the liberty whilst I was here of adding a shortcut to the main WikiProject page: WP:CANTAB, as WP:CAMBRIDGE has already been grabbed.
2. The Oxford WikiProject has tagged some (but not yet all) of the Oxford alumni / academics as being within the scope of the project. This makes it easier to find quality articles relating to the project. I've recently made a botrequest for the remainder of the pages in the appropriate OU categories to be tagged – is this something this project wants to do?
3. Wikinews is a bit short on CU (and OU) news stories. If you're looking for something different to do, then this might interest you.

Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 12:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 04:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 6

This will take place on 27 March. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

University of Cambridge articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the University of Cambridge articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Edward Craig (cricketer)

Hello. I've created a page on Edward Craig, who played first-class cricket for Cambridge University and Lancashire back in the early 1960s. Today he is a professor of philosophy, having had an academical associated with the University of Cambridge since the mid 1960s. I've posted him here hoping someone happens to come across this post and can expand that section. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 14:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation in college names

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Universities#Disambiguation_in_college_names regarding Balliol College / Balliol College, Oxford and if the title disambiguation is appropriate in Oxford and Cambridge college articles. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 00:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Discussion on consolidating inactive and semi-active university WikiProjects

This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Robert Metcalfe (scholar)

Page move discussion still ongoing for two weeks. Improve consensus by joining in. --George Ho (talk) 15:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shell Professor of Chemical Engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theprussian (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)