Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Vote6D

1. dab (ᛏ) 23:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
2. Best so far, though I'd still like to see the community feature got rid of or changed in format, per comments below, and box separation per comment below. BigBlueFish 21:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
3. I really like this one (though I agree with BigBlueFish on the changes to the community feature). Very nice work. Jweed 01:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
4. Many of the others have problems with the text being set in the boxes incorrectly. Ingoolemo ^talk 08:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
5. I like how the POTD is below. it reminds me of draft 6H, but somehow I like this better. The header seems more tidy. --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 10:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
6. I like the current version, but from all new proposals this is surely da best one. - Darwinek 11:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
7. I like this one best. Though, I wish we could make it so that clicking the images on the main page would bring the reader to the article, and not the (confusing) image description page. That's what readers are used to from other websites. Shanes 11:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
8. This is easily the best one.
9. The best candidate, by far. It offers a compromise, and has the POTD.
10. I'm not that fussed, they all (and the current one) seem fine to me. However, I'll vote D. Thincat 14:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
11. This one looks most pleasing and readible. The layout is most uniform contentwise, with chronology in one column, articles in another, and a not-so-huge featured photo at the bottom. I hope to see D grace the front page soon! --KHill-LTown 16:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
12. My favorite has photo but not overwhelming--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 17:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
13. Support, this is my favourite out of the current crop from a visual standpoint. Easy layout and not too much stuff happening. Just right. -- jeffthejiff (talk) 22:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
14. Support. The picture of the day box at the bottom is very nice, and everything else is well-balanced. The layout is less jarring than the similar draft H, as it flows from narrow to wide from top to bottom.--ragesoss 03:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
15. I am going with this one - I like the format of the current 4 features being on top. Also on my screen all 4 features appear and are clickable without scrolling - a big plus. Trödel•talk 12:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
16. --Missmarple 23:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
17. SUPPORT Perfect, classy, and those icons are scary. -WAZAAAA 01:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
18. Support. Icons, and the Wikipedia block at the bottom being in boxes, make me angry. Also, I must have the language list. This one is the best so far. --Bryan Nguyen | Talk 06:00, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
19. Support. Very easily navigated through design of the main page. Icons are classy. But featured picture must have more significance I think. 83.237.113.59 10:03, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
20. This one seems good. Let's go for it. Chick Bowen 00:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
21. This one and G are the best. I lik ehte simple layout. 71.125.142.200 02:48, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
22. Yeah i like this one.71.68.23.70 17:26, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
23. Support this is the best proposal for a new main page thus far. Rmpfu89 01:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)