Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Washington/Eastern Washington task force/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Attention WikiProject members! A Washington portal has recently been created and I would like to recruit members willing to help maintain the portal. The portal is fully operational and will be expanded with some help. To help maintain the portal, please sign up at the portal's talk page. --CG was here. (T - C - S - E) 21:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Merger?
 | There is a poll going on at the Washington WikiProject talk page to merge the Eastern Washington project into the larger WikiProject Washington as a task force. Please indicate in the poll if you are for / against this merger, or post any comments/concerns you have. Thank you. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC) |  |
Coeur d'Alene War, Spokane War, or Palouse War?
The article now titled Coeur d'Alene War was originally titled Spokane-Coeur d'Alene-Paloos War which is a "SYNTH" title; please see name discussion at Talk:Coeur_d'Alene_War#Moved_reversed. We're trying to come up with the "most correct" name for this war, which goes by all three of those names. Input from someone from one of those three nations or familiar with the history of the region would be greatly appreciated.Skookum1 (talk) 18:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Suggestion for WikiProject United States to support WikiProject Washington/Seattle/Eastern Washington
There is a discussion on the talk page of WikiProject Washington here about WikiProject Washington/Seattle/Eastern Washington to be supported by WikiProject United States. The discussion on WikiProject Washingtons talk page has been open for 10 days so far. --Kumioko (talk) 18:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Nomination as a United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month candidate
One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate here. --Kumioko (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Proposal for United States A-Class review process
There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an A-Class review process for United States related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion. Kumioko (talk) 02:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template
Greetings, there is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from Template:WikiProject United States. Most of the categories (over 220 Wikipedia wide) were deleted in February 2013 because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged here. Kumioko (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --Orlady (talk) 23:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 20 July 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Procedual close – RM is for articles. (non-admin closure) Dicklyon (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington/Eastern Washington task force → Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Northwest task force – Howpper (talk) 07:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
I am proposing an expansion of this WikiProject to include North Idaho since the Inland Northwest as a whole has more of a distinct identity than Eastern Washington alone. The task force would also be upgraded to a full Sub-project (like WikiProject Okanagan and WikiProject Seattle). The working title is "Inland Northwest task force". Does anybody have any objections or thoughts on the matter? Howpper (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Why does this need to be a WikiProject? The last comment on this talk page was in 2014. Also, if I'm not mistaken, creating a WikiProject should go through Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals and not by just simply renaming the task force. --Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- @Gonnym: I will retract my "proposal" to make it into a full WikiProject since this isn't the proper way to do so and it should be done in a separate process. Are there any objections or thoughts on Expanding the task force to cover North Idaho? Howpper (talk) 05:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.