Wikipedia talk:WikiRabbit

Lacks any sort of description

Yeah, a rabbit is a new user, or seems to be. Yeah, Hunters/Barbarians/Dragons/whatnot don't like them and beat them easily. Yeah, you can give them awards to pacify them. But the article doesn't actually say what a Rabbit does, what sets him apart from any other kind of new user. I can't tell if it means someone who just modifies small articles, adjusts major ones from time to time, or creates articles and leaves them hanging. Just what is this strange beast? Barren167 (talk) 22:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

In order to be a WikiRabbit, one must exhibit these four symptoms:

   Not be a WikiGoblin.
   Be new to Wikis.
   Be interested in Neuroscience,Brainwave Entrainment,mind control, Neurofeedback,Hypnosis or any other Neuroscience topic.
   Be prone to addictions.
   Signs you are being manipulated by a WikiRabbit,include: http://mentalhealthdaily.com/2014/04/15/5-types-of-brain-waves-frequencies-gamma-beta-alpha-theta-delta/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.97.184.215 (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC) 

Expanding

This page is in need of expanding. This may sound a bit silly, but would it be OK if I added some more information on this page? Orlando the Cat (talk) 02:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

New Subcatagory?

The WikiRabbit of Caerbannog fighting two brave WikiKnights. There is another type of WikiRabbit, and that is the killer bunny. They are vicious creatures usually found in the Cave of Caerbannog. Avoid them at all costs." Should this be in the article? Jason1357902 (talk) 13:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

The screenshot you added is licensed as non-free content which means it cannot be used on this page per Wikipedia's non-free content use criterion #9. If you want to add it as a link using the colon trick (like I did above), then you can. Whether it a link to the file and the corresponding text should be added is probably a different question. Perhaps others will post their opinions on that here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)