The 1932 United States presidential election in Tennessee took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election. Tennessee voters chose 11[2] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 11 Tennessee votes to the Electoral College | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
For over a century after the Civil War, Tennessee was divided according to political loyalties established in that war. Unionist regions covering almost all of East Tennessee, Kentucky Pennyroyal-allied Macon County, and the five West Tennessee Highland Rim counties of Carroll, Henderson, McNairy, Hardin and Wayne[3] voted Republican – generally by landslide margins – as they saw the Democratic Party as the "war party" who had forced them into a war they did not wish to fight.[4] Contrariwise, the rest of Middle and West Tennessee who had supported and driven the state's secession was equally fiercely Democratic as it associated the Republicans with Reconstruction.[5] After the disfranchisement of the state's African-American population by a poll tax was largely complete in the 1890s,[6] the Democratic Party was certain of winning statewide elections if united,[7] although unlike the Deep South Republicans would almost always gain thirty to forty percent of the statewide vote from mountain and Highland Rim support.
The 1920 elections saw a significant but not radical change, whereby by moving into a small number of traditionally Democratic areas in Middle Tennessee[8] and expanding turnout due to the Nineteenth Amendment and powerful isolationist sentiment,[9] the Republican Party was able to capture Tennessee's presidential electoral votes and win the governorship and take three congressional seats in addition to the rock-ribbed GOP First and Second Districts. In 1922 and 1924, with the ebbing of isolationist sympathy and a consequent decline in turnout,[10] the Democratic Party regained Tennessee's governorship and presidential electoral votes; however, in 1928 anti-Catholicism against Democratic nominee Al Smith in this powerfully fundamentalist state[11] meant that Herbert Hoover improved upon Harding’s performance, although he failed to gain the down-ballot coattails of 1920.
The Great Depression and the absence of anti-Catholic issues meant that it was universally expected Tennessee would return to Democratic ranks in 1932.[12] This was especially true because, despite a dispute over the Democratic gubernatorial primary that saw runner-up Lewis Pope make a third-party run in the general election, both Pope and primary winner Hill McAlister strongly backed Roosevelt.[12]
On polling day, the campaign managers for Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt (D–New York), running with Speaker John Nance Garner were confident that the Democratic Party would carry the state by at least one hundred thousand votes.[13] Although the campaign managers for incumbent President Hoover were confident he could retain the state, ultimately Roosevelt’s campaigns were conservative in their estimation. Tennessee would win by the Democrat with 66.49 percent of the popular vote, and Hoover would lose with only 32.48 percent.[14] Despite this, the crest of the Blue Ridge and Great Smoky Mountains would be the most resistant region to Roosevelt’s appeal in the entire nation: Hoover’s 84.51 percent of the vote in Johnson County, although less than the Republican percentage in the previous four elections, would be the highest he received in any county nationwide,[15] whilst Sevier County and Carter County would be Hoover’s fifth- and sixth-best nationally.
Results
edit| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 259,473 | 66.49% | |
| Republican | Herbert Hoover (inc.) | 126,752 | 32.48% | |
| Prohibition | William David Upshaw | 1,998 | 0.51% | |
| Socialist | Norman Thomas | 1,796 | 0.46% | |
| Communist | William Z. Foster | 237 | 0.06% | |
| Total votes | 390,256 | 100% | ||
Results by county
edit| 1932 United States presidential election in Tennessee by county[16] | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | Franklin Delano Roosevelt Democratic |
Herbert Clark Hoover Republican |
William David Upshaw Prohibition |
Norman Mattoon Thomas Socialist |
William Z. Foster Communist |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||||
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Anderson | 1,081 | 40.08% | 1,605 | 59.51% | 9 | 0.33% | 2 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | -524 | -19.43% | 2,697 |
| Bedford | 2,264 | 78.12% | 630 | 21.74% | 2 | 0.07% | 2 | 0.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,634 | 56.38% | 2,898 |
| Benton | 1,540 | 76.20% | 455 | 22.51% | 14 | 0.69% | 9 | 0.45% | 3 | 0.15% | 1,085 | 53.69% | 2,021 |
| Bledsoe | 1,034 | 51.86% | 960 | 48.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 74 | 3.71% | 1,994 |
| Blount | 1,515 | 31.13% | 3,275 | 67.29% | 61 | 1.25% | 14 | 0.29% | 2 | 0.04% | -1,760 | -36.16% | 4,867 |
| Bradley | 1,295 | 44.62% | 1,570 | 54.10% | 24 | 0.83% | 9 | 0.31% | 4 | 0.14% | -275 | -9.48% | 2,902 |
| Campbell | 1,834 | 39.79% | 2,735 | 59.34% | 22 | 0.48% | 18 | 0.39% | 0 | 0.00% | -901 | -19.55% | 4,609 |
| Cannon | 1,207 | 76.63% | 360 | 22.86% | 5 | 0.32% | 3 | 0.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 847 | 53.78% | 1,575 |
| Carroll | 2,603 | 50.48% | 2,505 | 48.58% | 25 | 0.48% | 15 | 0.29% | 8 | 0.16% | 98 | 1.90% | 5,156 |
| Carter | 1,574 | 23.74% | 5,055 | 76.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -3,481 | -52.51% | 6,629 |
| Cheatham | 1,370 | 87.71% | 180 | 11.52% | 3 | 0.19% | 7 | 0.45% | 2 | 0.13% | 1,190 | 76.18% | 1,562 |
| Chester | 985 | 72.59% | 356 | 26.23% | 10 | 0.74% | 4 | 0.29% | 2 | 0.15% | 629 | 46.35% | 1,357 |
| Claiborne | 3,518 | 66.82% | 1,725 | 32.76% | 16 | 0.30% | 5 | 0.09% | 1 | 0.02% | 1,793 | 34.06% | 5,265 |
| Clay | 819 | 68.48% | 361 | 30.18% | 6 | 0.50% | 10 | 0.84% | 0 | 0.00% | 458 | 38.29% | 1,196 |
| Cocke | 1,557 | 39.77% | 2,324 | 59.36% | 23 | 0.59% | 7 | 0.18% | 4 | 0.10% | -767 | -19.59% | 3,915 |
| Coffee | 1,950 | 81.25% | 430 | 17.92% | 13 | 0.54% | 5 | 0.21% | 2 | 0.08% | 1,520 | 63.33% | 2,400 |
| Crockett | 1,934 | 78.39% | 513 | 20.79% | 10 | 0.41% | 10 | 0.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,421 | 57.60% | 2,467 |
| Cumberland | 996 | 50.71% | 957 | 48.73% | 11 | 0.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 39 | 1.99% | 1,964 |
| Davidson | 21,233 | 74.07% | 7,004 | 24.43% | 105 | 0.37% | 300 | 1.05% | 24 | 0.08% | 14,229 | 49.64% | 28,666 |
| Decatur | 1,020 | 62.08% | 601 | 36.58% | 10 | 0.61% | 6 | 0.37% | 6 | 0.37% | 419 | 25.50% | 1,643 |
| DeKalb | 2,323 | 60.29% | 1,530 | 39.71% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 793 | 20.58% | 3,853 |
| Dickson | 2,007 | 84.33% | 369 | 15.50% | 4 | 0.17% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,638 | 68.82% | 2,380 |
| Dyer | 3,805 | 90.12% | 389 | 9.21% | 27 | 0.64% | 1 | 0.02% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,416 | 80.91% | 4,222 |
| Fayette | 1,287 | 95.62% | 42 | 3.12% | 12 | 0.89% | 5 | 0.37% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,245 | 92.50% | 1,346 |
| Fentress | 961 | 39.13% | 1,383 | 56.31% | 7 | 0.29% | 103 | 4.19% | 2 | 0.08% | -422 | -17.18% | 2,456 |
| Franklin | 3,029 | 88.65% | 360 | 10.54% | 20 | 0.59% | 6 | 0.18% | 2 | 0.06% | 2,669 | 78.11% | 3,417 |
| Gibson | 3,972 | 84.42% | 704 | 14.96% | 19 | 0.40% | 9 | 0.19% | 1 | 0.02% | 3,268 | 69.46% | 4,705 |
| Giles | 2,773 | 81.15% | 619 | 18.12% | 9 | 0.26% | 12 | 0.35% | 4 | 0.12% | 2,154 | 63.04% | 3,417 |
| Grainger | 995 | 42.29% | 1,325 | 56.31% | 22 | 0.93% | 6 | 0.25% | 5 | 0.21% | -330 | -14.02% | 2,353 |
| Greene | 4,264 | 56.61% | 3,223 | 42.79% | 35 | 0.46% | 10 | 0.13% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,041 | 13.82% | 7,532 |
| Grundy | 978 | 82.12% | 198 | 16.62% | 2 | 0.17% | 10 | 0.84% | 3 | 0.25% | 780 | 65.49% | 1,191 |
| Hamblen | 2,032 | 57.69% | 1,458 | 41.40% | 32 | 0.91% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 574 | 16.30% | 3,522 |
| Hamilton | 11,469 | 60.56% | 7,090 | 37.44% | 132 | 0.70% | 225 | 1.19% | 21 | 0.11% | 4,379 | 23.12% | 18,937 |
| Hancock | 551 | 33.60% | 1,089 | 66.40% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -538 | -32.80% | 1,640 |
| Hardeman | 2,377 | 88.69% | 281 | 10.49% | 16 | 0.60% | 3 | 0.11% | 3 | 0.11% | 2,096 | 78.21% | 2,680 |
| Hardin | 806 | 43.54% | 1,036 | 55.97% | 5 | 0.27% | 4 | 0.22% | 0 | 0.00% | -230 | -12.43% | 1,851 |
| Hawkins | 2,391 | 45.10% | 2,890 | 54.51% | 16 | 0.30% | 5 | 0.09% | 0 | 0.00% | -499 | -9.41% | 5,302 |
| Haywood | 1,788 | 95.01% | 77 | 4.09% | 16 | 0.85% | 1 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,711 | 90.91% | 1,882 |
| Henderson | 958 | 47.22% | 1,058 | 52.14% | 5 | 0.25% | 6 | 0.30% | 2 | 0.10% | -100 | -4.93% | 2,029 |
| Henry | 2,867 | 88.08% | 340 | 10.45% | 36 | 1.11% | 11 | 0.34% | 1 | 0.03% | 2,527 | 77.63% | 3,255 |
| Hickman | 1,812 | 82.18% | 385 | 17.46% | 8 | 0.36% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,427 | 64.72% | 2,205 |
| Houston | 750 | 86.51% | 112 | 12.92% | 3 | 0.35% | 2 | 0.23% | 0 | 0.00% | 638 | 73.59% | 867 |
| Humphreys | 1,455 | 85.44% | 231 | 13.56% | 5 | 0.29% | 8 | 0.47% | 4 | 0.23% | 1,224 | 71.87% | 1,703 |
| Jackson | 1,726 | 86.91% | 256 | 12.89% | 3 | 0.15% | 1 | 0.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,470 | 74.02% | 1,986 |
| Jefferson | 975 | 29.39% | 2,275 | 68.59% | 55 | 1.66% | 12 | 0.36% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,300 | -39.19% | 3,317 |
| Johnson | 425 | 14.96% | 2,400 | 84.51% | 14 | 0.49% | 1 | 0.04% | 0 | 0.00% | -1,975 | -69.54% | 2,840 |
| Knox | 10,755 | 51.39% | 9,774 | 46.71% | 227 | 1.08% | 171 | 0.82% | 0 | 0.00% | 981 | 4.69% | 20,927 |
| Lake | 1,824 | 95.90% | 78 | 4.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,746 | 91.80% | 1,902 |
| Lauderdale | 2,137 | 90.94% | 174 | 7.40% | 18 | 0.77% | 19 | 0.81% | 2 | 0.09% | 1,963 | 83.53% | 2,350 |
| Lawrence | 3,240 | 65.48% | 1,684 | 34.03% | 19 | 0.38% | 5 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,556 | 31.45% | 4,948 |
| Lewis | 799 | 85.36% | 137 | 14.64% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 662 | 70.73% | 936 |
| Lincoln | 3,095 | 90.26% | 288 | 8.40% | 38 | 1.11% | 7 | 0.20% | 1 | 0.03% | 2,807 | 81.86% | 3,429 |
| Loudon | 1,629 | 46.50% | 1,817 | 51.87% | 19 | 0.54% | 31 | 0.88% | 7 | 0.20% | -188 | -5.37% | 3,503 |
| Macon | 885 | 43.86% | 1,123 | 55.65% | 7 | 0.35% | 3 | 0.15% | 0 | 0.00% | -238 | -11.79% | 2,018 |
| Madison | 4,813 | 79.83% | 1,124 | 18.64% | 65 | 1.08% | 27 | 0.45% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,689 | 61.19% | 6,029 |
| Marion | 2,212 | 61.14% | 1,406 | 38.86% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 806 | 22.28% | 3,618 |
| Marshall | 2,167 | 87.73% | 283 | 11.46% | 20 | 0.81% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,884 | 76.28% | 2,470 |
| Maury | 3,392 | 85.83% | 535 | 13.54% | 19 | 0.48% | 3 | 0.08% | 3 | 0.08% | 2,857 | 72.29% | 3,952 |
| McMinn | 2,630 | 47.86% | 2,790 | 50.77% | 38 | 0.69% | 35 | 0.64% | 2 | 0.04% | -160 | -2.91% | 5,495 |
| McNairy | 1,961 | 59.01% | 1,350 | 40.63% | 12 | 0.36% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 611 | 18.39% | 3,323 |
| Meigs | 840 | 59.66% | 564 | 40.06% | 4 | 0.28% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 276 | 19.60% | 1,408 |
| Monroe | 2,954 | 65.97% | 1,504 | 33.59% | 9 | 0.20% | 9 | 0.20% | 2 | 0.04% | 1,450 | 32.38% | 4,478 |
| Montgomery | 2,747 | 77.47% | 799 | 22.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,948 | 54.94% | 3,546 |
| Moore | 923 | 92.67% | 65 | 6.53% | 7 | 0.70% | 1 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 858 | 86.14% | 996 |
| Morgan | 983 | 44.99% | 1,184 | 54.19% | 9 | 0.41% | 9 | 0.41% | 0 | 0.00% | -201 | -9.20% | 2,185 |
| Obion | 3,183 | 89.18% | 334 | 9.36% | 40 | 1.12% | 12 | 0.34% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,849 | 79.83% | 3,569 |
| Overton | 2,231 | 76.80% | 661 | 22.75% | 7 | 0.24% | 4 | 0.14% | 2 | 0.07% | 1,570 | 54.04% | 2,905 |
| Perry | 705 | 78.95% | 182 | 20.38% | 3 | 0.34% | 2 | 0.22% | 1 | 0.11% | 523 | 58.57% | 893 |
| Pickett | 712 | 50.28% | 681 | 48.09% | 14 | 0.99% | 8 | 0.56% | 1 | 0.07% | 31 | 2.19% | 1,416 |
| Polk | 2,540 | 60.74% | 1,642 | 39.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 898 | 21.47% | 4,182 |
| Putnam | 2,911 | 69.08% | 1,281 | 30.40% | 10 | 0.24% | 7 | 0.17% | 5 | 0.12% | 1,630 | 38.68% | 4,214 |
| Rhea | 1,550 | 51.05% | 1,448 | 47.69% | 23 | 0.76% | 10 | 0.33% | 5 | 0.16% | 102 | 3.36% | 3,036 |
| Roane | 1,625 | 43.81% | 2,036 | 54.89% | 48 | 1.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -411 | -11.08% | 3,709 |
| Robertson | 2,752 | 90.71% | 252 | 8.31% | 19 | 0.63% | 9 | 0.30% | 2 | 0.07% | 2,500 | 82.40% | 3,034 |
| Rutherford | 3,924 | 86.24% | 606 | 13.32% | 11 | 0.24% | 9 | 0.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 3,318 | 72.92% | 4,550 |
| Scott | 1,025 | 34.86% | 1,890 | 64.29% | 5 | 0.17% | 18 | 0.61% | 2 | 0.07% | -865 | -29.42% | 2,940 |
| Sequatchie | 777 | 72.21% | 289 | 26.86% | 10 | 0.93% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 488 | 45.35% | 1,076 |
| Sevier | 887 | 22.21% | 3,075 | 77.01% | 22 | 0.55% | 9 | 0.23% | 0 | 0.00% | -2,188 | -54.80% | 3,993 |
| Shelby | 38,320 | 84.76% | 6,332 | 14.01% | 96 | 0.21% | 417 | 0.92% | 44 | 0.10% | 31,988 | 70.76% | 45,209 |
| Smith | 2,057 | 77.10% | 595 | 22.30% | 9 | 0.34% | 7 | 0.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,462 | 54.80% | 2,668 |
| Stewart | 1,548 | 88.76% | 184 | 10.55% | 7 | 0.40% | 5 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,364 | 78.21% | 1,744 |
| Sullivan | 5,322 | 63.04% | 2,999 | 35.52% | 112 | 1.33% | 2 | 0.02% | 7 | 0.08% | 2,323 | 27.52% | 8,442 |
| Sumner | 3,893 | 90.47% | 382 | 8.88% | 20 | 0.46% | 7 | 0.16% | 1 | 0.02% | 3,511 | 81.59% | 4,303 |
| Tipton | 2,892 | 94.23% | 154 | 5.02% | 16 | 0.52% | 4 | 0.13% | 3 | 0.10% | 2,738 | 89.21% | 3,069 |
| Trousdale | 835 | 92.78% | 64 | 7.11% | 1 | 0.11% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 771 | 85.67% | 900 |
| Unicoi | 850 | 33.13% | 1,716 | 66.87% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -866 | -33.75% | 2,566 |
| Union | 802 | 40.44% | 1,169 | 58.95% | 12 | 0.61% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -367 | -18.51% | 1,983 |
| Van Buren | 613 | 73.59% | 196 | 23.53% | 20 | 2.40% | 1 | 0.12% | 3 | 0.36% | 417 | 50.06% | 833 |
| Warren | 2,325 | 84.09% | 410 | 14.83% | 21 | 0.76% | 7 | 0.25% | 2 | 0.07% | 1,915 | 69.26% | 2,765 |
| Washington | 3,345 | 46.86% | 3,691 | 51.71% | 71 | 0.99% | 31 | 0.43% | 0 | 0.00% | -346 | -4.85% | 7,138 |
| Wayne | 543 | 33.13% | 1,082 | 66.02% | 6 | 0.37% | 4 | 0.24% | 4 | 0.24% | -539 | -32.89% | 1,639 |
| Weakley | 3,777 | 82.52% | 783 | 17.11% | 13 | 0.28% | 3 | 0.07% | 1 | 0.02% | 2,994 | 65.41% | 4,577 |
| White | 1,938 | 82.79% | 390 | 16.66% | 9 | 0.38% | 4 | 0.17% | 0 | 0.00% | 1,548 | 66.13% | 2,341 |
| Williamson | 2,777 | 89.96% | 261 | 8.45% | 23 | 0.75% | 19 | 0.62% | 7 | 0.23% | 2,516 | 81.50% | 3,087 |
| Wilson | 2,713 | 82.26% | 567 | 17.19% | 15 | 0.45% | 3 | 0.09% | 0 | 0.00% | 2,146 | 65.07% | 3,298 |
| Totals | 259,473 | 66.48% | 126,752 | 32.48% | 1,998 | 0.51% | 1,796 | 0.46% | 254 | 0.07% | 132,721 | 34.01% | 390,273 |
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
editReferences
edit- ^ "United States Presidential election of 1932 – Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved March 5, 2019.
- ^ "1932 Election for the Thirty-seventh Term (1933-37)". Retrieved March 5, 2019.
- ^ Wright, John K.; 'Voting Habits in the United States: A Note on Two Maps'; Geographical Review, vol. 22, no. 4 (October 1932), pp. 666-672
- ^ Key (Jr.), Valdimer Orlando; Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York, 1949), pp. 282-283
- ^ Lyons, William; Scheb (II), John M. and Stair Billy; Government and Politics in Tennessee, pp. 183-184 ISBN 1572331410
- ^ Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 208, 210 ISBN 9780691163246
- ^ Grantham, Dewey W.; 'Tennessee and Twentieth-Century American Politics'; Tennessee Historical Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Fall 1995), pp. 210-229
- ^ Reichard, Gary W.; 'The Aberration of 1920: An Analysis of Harding's Victory in Tennessee'; The Journal of Southern History, Vol. 36, No. 1 (February 1970), pp. 33-49
- ^ Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 211
- ^ Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 287
- ^ Larson, Edward J. (October 3, 2006). Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion. Basic Books. ISBN 9780465075102.
- ^ a b "Dixie Voters Will Again Cast Ballots as Solid South: G.O.P. Hoping to Hold Some Gains; Reunited Democrats Planning to Deliver Intact Block to Party Nominee". The Birmingham News. Birmingham, Alabama. November 6, 1932. p. 8.
- ^ "Rain — and Votes — To Pour in County Today – All Governorship Candidates Confident; Shofner Predicts victories for Hoover and McCall over Tennessee". The Knoxville Journal. Knoxville, Tennessee. November 8, 1932. pp. 1, 5.
- ^ "1932 Presidential General Election Results – Tennessee". Retrieved March 5, 2019.
- ^ "1932 Presidential Election Statistics". Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
- ^ "TN US President, November 08, 1932". Our Campaigns.