Wikipedia

Amitav Acharya

Amitav Acharya (born 1962) is a scholar and author, who is Distinguished Professor of International Relations at American University, Washington, D.C., where he holds the UNESCO Chair in Transnational Challenges and Governance at the School of International Service, and serves as the chair of the ASEAN Studies Initiative.[1] Acharya has expertise in and has made contributions to a wide range of topics in International Relations, including constructivism, ASEAN and Asian regionalism, and Global International Relations.[2] He became the first non-Western President of the International Studies Association when he was elected to the post for 2014–15.[3]

Amitav Acharya
Born1962
Jagatsinghpur, Orissa (now Odisha), India
Academic background
Alma materRavenshaw University
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Murdoch University
Academic work
School or traditionConstructivism
InstitutionsAmerican University
Main interestsInternational relations
Constructivism
Foreign policy
Regionalism
Global governance
Human security
Asia
National security
Globalization
Notable ideasGlobal IR

Career

edit

Acharya was born in Jagatsinghpur, Orissa (now Odisha), India. After completing a BA in political science at Ravenshaw University and an MA in political science at Jawaharlal Nehru University in India, he obtained his doctorate from Murdoch University in Australia in 1987.[4] After brief teaching and research stints in Singapore at the Institute for Southeast Studies (now ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute) and the National University of Singapore, he joined the faculty of York University, Toronto in 1993.[5] He was a Fellow at Harvard University's newly established Asia Center in 2000–2001, while concurrently being a Fellow of the Center for Business and Government at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government.[6] From 2001 and 2007, he served as deputy director and Head of Research at the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (which in 2007 became the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies), at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.[7] In 2007, he was appointed Chair of Global Governance and Director of the Centre for Governance and International Affairs at the University of Bristol.[1] In 2009, he moved to his present position at American University.

Acharya has held various visiting positions throughout his career, including as the ASEM Chair in Regional Integration at the University of Malaya, the Direk Jayanama Visiting Professor of Political Science at Thammasat University, Visiting Professorial Fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, Visiting Professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Economics at Chulalongkorn University. He has also held visiting positions at Australian National University, Stanford University, Sydney University, United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies, Vietnam National University, Central European University, and Ritsumeikan University. He was elected to a Christensen Fellowship at St Catherine's College, University of Oxford in 2012.[8] In 2012–13, he was appointed to the Nelson Mandela Visiting Professorship in International Relations at Rhodes University, South Africa.[9] In 2016, he was appointed to be the Inaugural Boeing Company Chair in International Relations in the Schwarzman Scholars Program at Tsinghua University.

In 2016, Acharya was awarded the prestigious Odisha Living Legend Award from the Odisha Diary Foundation in his native state of Odisha and delivered the Living Legend Oration at Bhubaneswar.[10] He has received two Distinguished Scholar awards from the International Studies Association: one from the Global South Caucus in 2016,[11] and another from the International Organization section in 2018.[12]

In 2020, he received American University's highest honor: Scholar-Teacher of the Year Award. In 2022 Acharya won the International Studies Association Inaugural 2023 Distinguished Scholar Award.[13]

Research

edit

Acharya's major research interests include the diffusion of ideas and norms in world politics, and constructivist International Relations (IR) theory more generally; comparative regionalism, with a focus on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN); and contributions to IR theory and practice from the Global South, or Global IR.[14][15] Acharya's research combines and cuts across these different topics, often touching upon multiple themes in a single work.

Norm localization and norm subsidiarity

edit

Acharya's principal contributions that advance constructivist IR theory are the concepts of norm localization and norm subsidiarity. Constructivism has traditionally accorded more importance to the role of ideas and norms in international politics compared to realism and liberalism. However, Acharya points out that most constructivists conceive of ideas as spreading outward from the West (or the Global North) to the "Rest" (or the Global South). Acharya challenges this story of unidirectional norm diffusion by showing how "local" beliefs and practices also matter. Using case studies from ASEAN, Acharya highlights how Southeast Asian leaders did not just accept transnational norms as is. Rather, where such transnational norms were in line with prior local beliefs, or "cognitive priors", they were successfully "localized". This is exemplified in how the ASEAN states localized the "common security" norm of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe into "cooperative security" as manifested in the ASEAN Regional Forum. While the cooperative security norm recognized the need for inclusive regional security cooperation, it rejected the legalistic and domestic politics aspects of the common security norm, in line with the basic tenets of the ASEAN Way.[16][17]

While norm localization emphasizes the agency of local actors in adapting prevailing transnational norms, norm subsidiarity is concerned with the creation of new norms by local actors. Norm subsidiarity posits that local actors create new norms and rules with a view toward protecting the norm's autonomy from violation and abuse at the international level. In contrast to localization, which is inward-looking, subsidiarity is outward-looking. Acharya again uses a case from Southeast Asia to illustrate the concept. In resistance to the US-led collective defence organization of the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization signed in 1954, the leaders of South and Southeast Asia met at the Bandung Conference in 1955 and established their support for the norm of collective defence but rejected the use of such an arrangement for the defence of a single country. In so doing, the leaders at Bandung not only rejected the central position of the United States in regional security arrangements, but also created a new norm of collective defence that accorded importance to all treaty members.[18][19]

A number of IR scholars have built on, engaged with, and challenged Acharya's work on norms, including Antje Wiener, Lisbeth Zimmerman, and Kathryn Sikkink. Through her concept of "norm protagonism", Sikkink goes beyond Acharya by divorcing the formation and diffusion of norms in the Global South from the North. She illustrates how Latin American countries were protagonists of human rights norms and, among other things, adopted the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man in April 1948, eight months before the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1948.[20]

Comparative regionalism

edit

Acharya places a high importance on the study of regions in world politics. His work has attempted to bridge the gap between scholarship in IR and area studies by encouraging conversation between "regionally oriented disciplinarists" and "discipline-oriented regionalists".[21] For Acharya, rather than imagining a "world of regions",[22] where it is primarily superpowers that shape how and when regions are important,[23] it is more useful to think of "regional worlds", where the roles of external powers are balanced by the countries that constitute the region and construct it from within.[24]

Acharya's most prolific work has been on ASEAN. In Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia,[25] Acharya traces the evolution of ASEAN and the ASEAN Way of conflict management, which is based on the ASEAN norms of non-interference and avoidance of confrontations in word and deed.[26] Building upon the work on the concept of a security community—a region where the outbreak of war has become almost unthinkable—by Karl Deutsch[27] and Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett,[28] Acharya finds that ASEAN exhibits the characteristics of a nascent pluralistic security community.

Acharya has also been critical of the Eurocentrism prevalent in comparative regionalism, whereby the European Union (EU) is considered as the best way to regionalize—a model for regional integration—and regionalism projects in other parts of the world are judged against the EU. Rather than compare with the EU, Acharya calls for studies in comparative regionalism to focus more on the specific regional contexts of regionalism projects and to develop more general criteria for comparison that are not based solely on the European experience.[29]

Global IR and a multiplex world order

edit

In line with his focus on the role and contributions of the Global South to IR theory and practice, Acharya has advanced what he terms "Global IR". One aspect of Global IR is to uncover sources of IR theory from the non-Western world to counterbalance the dominating influence of European history—from the Peloponnesian War in Ancient Greece to the nineteenth-century balance of power under the Concert of Europe—on contemporary IR theory. Along with Barry Buzan, Acharya has published two books on Global International Relations theory that explore scholarly thinking as well as teaching traditions on international relations and foreign policy throughout the Global South.[30][31]

One reason Acharya and Buzan transitioned from "non-Western" to "Global" IR theory is that Global IR, while challenging traditional IR's neglect and marginalization of the Global South, does not reject the mainstream theories, thus differentiating Acharya from postcolonial IR scholars. Global IR revolves around six main dimensions:

  • It is based on pluralistic universalism that recognizes diversity and abjures universal imposition
  • It is grounded in world history
  • It supplements and subsumes, rather than supplants, traditional IR
  • It includes the study of regions as a core part of IR
  • It eschews exceptionalism
  • It recognizes both ideational and material forms of agency[32]

Acharya's concept of the "multiplex world order" captures his understanding of the ongoing changes and future directions in the landscape of international relations. While not arguing that the United States is in decline per se, Acharya contends that the "American world order", whereby the United States played a hegemonic role in shaping the international system—or the "liberal world order"—to its own benefit through its dominant role in international institutions and its interventionalist foreign policy, is coming to an end.[33] In this respect, Acharya disagrees with John Ikenberry, who highlights America's important role in designing, spearheading, and maintaining postwar "constitutional orders".[34][35] In contrast to Ikenberry, Acharya finds evidence of an emerging "multiplex" world order, where there is an array of plots (ideas), directors (power), and action (leadership) under one roof (the international system) to choose from.[36]

Professional activities

edit

Acharya was elected President of the International Studies Association (ISA) for 2014–15.[1] He was the first Indian, Asian, and non-Western scholar to be elected as ISA President. He was a vice-president of the ISA in 2008–09. He is one of the founders of the Asian Political and International Studies Association (APISA), and served as its inaugural co-president in 2003–04.[37][38]

He is the joint chief editor of the Studies in Asian Security series for Stanford University Press.[39]

Acharya's work has been influential in shaping policy on Asian regionalism and human security. His 2001 book, Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia, was the primary basis of the initial Indonesian concept paper which ultimately resulted in the establishment of the ASEAN Political-Security Community.[40] His work on human security led to him being invited to address the UN General Assembly on the subject of human security on 14 April 2011.[41]

He has been interviewed as an international affairs expert by CNN International, BBC,[42] BBC World Service Radio, CNBC, Channel NewsAsia, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Radio Australia, National Public Radio (NPR),[43] and Al Jazeera.[44]

Acharya regularly writes op-eds[45] for international newspapers and magazines including The Financial Times,[46] the International Herald Tribune, The New York Times,[47] National Public Radio (NPR) online,[48] The Huffington Post,[49] The Australian Financial Review, Asia Times, The Times of India,[50] The Indian Express, The Straits Times, The Jakarta Post,[51] the Bangkok Post,[52] Asiaweek, the Far Eastern Economic Review, The Japan Times, the South China Morning Post, YaleGlobal Online[53] covering such topics as international and Asian security, regional integration, the war on terror, and the rise of China and India.

On 28 October 2021, he participated in a debate hosted by the Oxford Union. The motion was framed as: “This House Would Still Look to the US for Global Leadership”.

Speaking for the motion were Sir Malcolm Rifkind, former British Foreign Secretary, Jane Harman, former member of the US House of Representative from California and former President of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, James Cleverly, former co-chair of the British Conservative Party and currently Minister of State (Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Department for International Development), and Dr Laura Smith of Oxford. The opposition side comprising Acharya, the Russian Ambassador to UK Andrey Kelin, Simon Von Teutem (Oxford student) and Patrick Cole (Oxford student), won the debate 166–124.

Bibliography

edit

Acharya is the author of:

He has also co-authored or edited:

Acharya has also published several articles in a wide range of International Relations journals. Some of his widely cited articles include:

References

edit
  1. ^ a b c "Profile Amitav Acharya". American University. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  2. ^ "Professor Amitav Acharya". Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, The University of Queensland, Australia. 9 August 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  3. ^ "Acharya Elected President of International Studies Association". American University. 12 February 2013. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  4. ^ "Alumni honoured for professional and community excellence | Murdoch University". Media.murdoch.edu.au. 26 July 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  5. ^ "Dr. Amitav Acharya". Cris.unu.edu. Archived from the original on 31 January 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  6. ^ "Center for Business and Government". Hks.harvard.edu. 13 December 2000. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  7. ^ "Amitav Acharya". Ppa.hss.ntu.edu.sg. Archived from the original on 24 June 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  8. ^ "Christensen Fellowship". Amitav Acharya. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  9. ^ Rhodes University (7 May 2012). "Rhodes University". Ru.ac.za. Archived from the original on 24 June 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  10. ^ "Sixth Odisha Living Legend and Youth Inspiration and OdishaInc Awards Conferred | Voice of Western Odisha". navratnanews.com. Archived from the original on 31 July 2017.
  11. ^ "Past Recipients". International Studies Association. Retrieved 21 September 2019.
  12. ^ "Past Recipients". International Studies Association. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  13. ^ @girs_isa (21 August 2022). "Global IR Section of @ISAnet is pleased to announce the winner of its inaugural 2023 Distinguished Scholar Award, @AmitavAcharya for his outstanding scholarship and continuing service to the profession" (Tweet). Retrieved 23 August 2022 – via Twitter.
  14. ^ "Theory Talk #42 – Amitav Acharya," (On the Relevance of Regions, ASEAN, and Western IR's false universalisms), 10 August 2011. http://www.theory-talks.org/2011/08/theory-talk-42.html
  15. ^ "Constructing Security and Identity in Southeast Asia," Interview with Amitav Acharya published by the Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol.11, no.2 (Winter-Spring 2006), 155–164. http://www.bjwa.org/article.php?id=Bsg9lE965f1HviKf8L7VqWf0xYX7FR347fH0dj0l Archived 12 May 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  16. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2004). "How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism". International Organization. 58 (2): 239–275. doi:10.1017/S0020818304582024.
  17. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2009). Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  18. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2011). "Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World". International Studies Quarterly. 55 (1): 95–123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x. S2CID 143091369.
  19. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2018). Constructing Global Order: Agency and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. ^ Sikkink, Kathryn (2014). "Latin American Countries as Norm Protagonists of the Idea of International Human Rights". Global Governance. 20 (3): 389–404. doi:10.1163/19426720-02003005. S2CID 153401534.
  21. ^ Russo, Alessandra (2016). "Comparative Regionalism: Still Emerging, Already to Be Reformed?". International Politics Reviews. 4 (1): 7–16. doi:10.1057/ipr.2016.6. S2CID 132354266.
  22. ^ Katzenstein, Peter J. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  23. ^ Buzan, Barry; Wæver, Ole (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2007). "The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics". World Politics. 59 (4): 629–652. doi:10.1353/wp.2008.0000. S2CID 154724042.
  25. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.
  26. ^ Masilamani, Logan; Peterson, Kimmy (15 October 2014). "The "ASEAN Way": The Structural Underpinnings of Constructive Engagement" (PDF). Foreign Policy Journal: 1–21. Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  27. ^ Deutsch, Karl W. (1957). Political Community in the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  28. ^ Adler, Emanuel; Barnett, Michael (1998). Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  29. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2012). "Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come?". The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs. 47 (1): 3–15.
  30. ^ Acharya, Amitav; Buzan, Barry (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Reflections on and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
  31. ^ Acharya, Amitav; Buzan, Barry (2019). The Making of Global International Relations: Origins and Evolution of IR at its Centenary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2014). "Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies". International Studies Quarterly. 58 (4): 647–659. doi:10.1111/isqu.12171.
  33. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2018). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  34. ^ Ikenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. ^ Ikenberry, G. John (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  36. ^ Acharya, Amitav (2017). "After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order". Ethics & International Affairs. 31 (3): 271–285. doi:10.1017/S089267941700020X.
  37. ^ "Welcome". Asian Political and International Studies Association. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  38. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2016. Retrieved 17 May 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  39. ^ "Studies in Asian Security". Stanford University Press. Retrieved 12 July 2019.
  40. ^ K.K. Khine, "The Making of Indonesia's Concept of ASEAN Security Community," Universities Research Journal, Vol. 4, No. 7 (2011). p.247
  41. ^ On 14 April 2011, at the invitation of its President, he addressed the United Nations General Assembly in New York on the subject of human security.; https://www.un.org/en/ga/president/65/initiatives/Human%20Security/Amitav%20Acharya%20UNGA%20Human%20Security%20Debate%20Presentation.pdf
  42. ^ "Transcend Director Appears on Bbc World News". YouTube. 18 September 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  43. ^ "President Obama Visits Asia: Forum | KQED Public Media for Northern CA". Kqed.org. 15 November 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  44. ^ "Riz Khan – Islam and the East – 18 Nov 09 – Pt 1". YouTube. 19 November 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  45. ^ "Op-Ed Archive Selections". Amitav Acharya. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  46. ^ "/ UK – East Asian integration is a test for the big powers". Ft.com. 14 December 2005. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  47. ^ Six op-eds are available at The New York Times website: Clash of Civilizations? No, of National Interests and Principles (10 January 2002); The war on terror : One result: The retreat of liberal democracy (17 September 2002); Sovereignty : Asians are wary of pushy outsiders (23 January 2003); Security lessons : Ripples from Iraq will rock Asia (25 April 2003); Asia-Pacific : China's charm offensive in Southeast Asia (8 November 2003); Asia needs better ways to protect its people (16 March 2005)
  48. ^ Acharya, Amitav. "No Dalai Lama Meeting? Think Again, Obama". NPR. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  49. ^ Acharya, Amitav (22 March 2012). "It's About Time Harper Went to Thailand". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 10 May 2014.
  50. ^ Amitav Acharya (21 February 2011). "The Cairo connection". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 28 December 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  51. ^ "Will ASEAN thrive in 2030?". The Jakarta Post. 14 February 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  52. ^ Acharya, Amitav (23 October 2011). "Courting America without getting China in a tizz". Asian Security Outlook. Archived from the original on 29 June 2012. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
  53. ^ Democracy in Burma: Does Anybody Really Care? (1 September 2005); Can Asia Step Up to 21st Century Leadership? (1 December 2011)
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amitav_Acharya&oldid=1256320404"