This section needs additional citations for verification. (September 2017) |
Federal elections were held in Germany on 24 September 2017 to elect the members of the 19th Bundestag. At stake were at least 598 seats in the Bundestag, as well as 111 overhang and leveling seats determined thereafter.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 709 seats in the Bundestag (including overhang and leveling seats) 355 seats needed for a majority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opinion polls | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Registered | 61,688,485 0.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnout | 46,976,341 (76.2%) 4.7pp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The left side shows constituency winners of the election by their party colours. The right side shows party list winners of the election for the additional members by their party colours. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Christian Democratic Union of Germany and the Christian Social Union of Bavaria (CDU/CSU), led by incumbent chancellor Angela Merkel, won the highest percentage of the vote with 33%, though it suffered a large swing against it of more than 8%. The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) achieved its worst result since post-war Germany at 21%. Alternative for Germany (AfD), which was previously unrepresented in the Bundestag, became the third party in the Bundestag with 12.6% of the vote, whilst the Free Democratic Party (FDP) won 10.7% of the vote and returned to the Bundestag after losing all their seats in 2013. It was the first time since 1957 that a party to the political right of the CDU/CSU gained seats in the Bundestag. The other parties to achieve representation in the Bundestag were the Left and Alliance 90/The Greens, each close to 9% of the vote. In the 709 member Bundestag, a majority is 355 and the CDU/CSU won 246 seats (200 CDU and 46 CSU), the SPD 153, the AfD 94, the FDP 80, The Left 69, and the Greens 67.
For the second consecutive occasion, the CDU/CSU reached a coalition agreement with the SPD to form a grand coalition, the fourth in post-war German history, and the new government took office on 14 March 2018. The agreement came after a failed attempt by the CDU/CSU to enter into a Jamaica coalition with the Greens and the FDP, which the latter pulled out of citing irreconcilable differences between the parties on migration and energy policy. This had been by far the longest government formation in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany, as it was the first time a proposed coalition formation negotiation had collapsed and had been replaced by another coalition.
Background
editAt the 2013 German federal election, the incumbent government composed of the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU), the Christian Social Union of Bavaria (CSU), and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) had failed to maintain a majority of seats. The FDP[1] failed to get over 5% of the vote in 2013, denying the party seats in the Bundestag for the first time in its history. In contrast, the CDU/CSU obtained their best result since 1990, with nearly 42% of the vote and just short of 50% of the seats. The CDU/CSU then successfully negotiated with the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) to form a grand coalition for the third time.[2]
In January 2017, party leader Sigmar Gabriel recommended Martin Schulz, the former President of the European Parliament, as their leader and chancellor candidate.[a] The party substantially increased its support as a result; however, the CDU afterward regained its lead, with polls generally showing a 13–16% lead over the SPD.
Date
editGerman law requires that a new Bundestag shall be elected on a Sunday or on a nationwide holiday between 46 and 48 months after the last Bundestag's first sitting (Basic Law Article 39 Section 1).[3] In January 2017, then-President Joachim Gauck scheduled the election for 24 September 2017.[4]
After the election, the 19th Bundestag had to hold its first sitting within 30 days. Until that first sitting, the members of the 18th Bundestag remained in office (Basic Law Article 39 Section 1 and 2).[3]
Electoral system
editGermany uses the mixed-member proportional representation system, a system of proportional representation combined with elements of first-past-the-post voting. The Bundestag has 598 nominal members, elected for a four-year term; these seats are distributed between the sixteen German states in proportion to the states' population eligible to vote.
Every elector has two votes: a constituency and a list vote. 299 members are elected in single-member constituencies by first-past-the-post, based just on the first votes. The second votes are used to produce an overall proportional result in the states and then in the Bundestag. Seats are allocated using the Sainte-Laguë method. If a party wins fewer constituency seats in a state than its second votes would entitle it to, it receives additional seats from the relevant state list. Parties can file lists in each single state under certain conditions, such as a fixed number of supporting signatures. Parties can receive second votes only in those states in which they have successfully filed a state list.
If a party by winning single-member constituencies in one state receives more seats than it would be entitled to according to its second vote share in that state (overhang seats), the other parties receive compensation seats. Owing to this provision, the Bundestag usually has more than 598 members. The 18th Bundestag, for example, started with 631 seats: 598 regular and 33 overhang and compensation seats. Overhang seats are calculated at the state level, so many more seats are added to balance this out among the different states, adding more seats than would be needed to compensate for overhang at the national level in order to avoid negative vote weight.
In order to qualify for seats based on the party-list vote share, a party must either win three single-member constituencies or exceed a threshold of 5% of the second votes nationwide. If a party only wins one or two single-member constituencies and fails to get at least 5% of the second votes, it keeps the single-member seat(s), but other parties that accomplish at least one of the two threshold conditions receive compensation seats. During the 2002 German federal election, the PDS won only 4.0% of the party-list votes nationwide but won two constituencies in the state of Berlin. The same applies if an independent candidate wins a single-member constituency, which has not happened since 1949. In the 2013 German federal election, the FDP only won 4.8% of party-list votes; this cost it all of its seats in the Bundestag.
If a voter has cast a first vote for a successful independent candidate or a successful candidate whose party failed to qualify for proportional representation, their second vote does not count to determine proportional representation; however, it does count to determine whether the elected party has exceeded the 5% threshold.
Parties representing recognized national minorities, such as Danes, Frisians, Sorbs, and Romani people, are exempt from the 5% threshold but normally only run in state elections.[5]
Parties and leaders
editAltogether 38 parties have managed to get on the ballot in at least one state and can therefore (theoretically) earn proportional representation in the Bundestag.[6] Furthermore, there are several independent candidates, running for a single-member constituency. Below are the major parties that are likely to either exceed the threshold of 5% second votes or to win single-member constituencies (first votes).
Name | Ideology | Leading candidate(s) |
2013 result | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes (%)[b] | Seats | ||||||
CDU/CSU | CDU | Christian Democratic Union of Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands |
Christian democracy | Angela Merkel | 34.1% | 311 / 631
| |
CSU | Christian Social Union in Bavaria Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern |
7.4% | |||||
SPD | Social Democratic Party of Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands |
Social democracy | Martin Schulz | 25.7% | 193 / 631
| ||
Linke | The Left Die Linke |
Democratic socialism | Dietmar Bartsch Sahra Wagenknecht |
8.6% | 64 / 631
| ||
Grüne | Alliance 90/The Greens Bündnis 90/Die Grünen |
Green politics | Cem Özdemir Katrin Göring-Eckardt |
8.4% | 63 / 631
| ||
FDP | Free Democratic Party Freie Demokratische Partei |
Liberalism | Christian Lindner | 4.8% | 0 / 631
| ||
AfD | Alternative for Germany Alternative für Deutschland |
National conservatism | Alexander Gauland Alice Weidel |
4.7% | 0 / 631
|
Traditionally, the Christian Democratic Union of Germany (CDU) and the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU), which refer to each other as sister parties, do not compete against each other. The CSU only contests elections in Bavaria, while the CDU contests elections in the other fifteen states. Although these parties have some differences, such as the CSU's opposition to the previous government's immigration policies,[7] the CDU and CSU share the same basic political aims and are allowed by the Regulations of the Bundestag to join into one parliamentary Fraktion (a parliamentary group composed of at least 5% of the members of the Bundestag, entitled to specific rights in parliament) after the elections,[8] as they do in the form of the CDU/CSU group.
As the CDU/CSU and the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) were likely to win the most seats in the election, their leading candidates are referred to as chancellor candidates; however, this does not mean that the new Bundestag is legally bound to elect one of them as chancellor.
Opinion polling
editResults
editThe CDU/CSU and the SPD remained the two largest parties in the Bundestag, but both received a significantly lower proportion of the vote than they did in the 2013 German federal election.
The AfD received enough votes to enter the Bundestag for the first time, taking 12.6 percent of the vote—more than double the five percent threshold required to qualify for full parliamentary status. It also won three constituency seats, which would have qualified it for proportionally-elected seats in any event.
The FDP returned to the Bundestag with 10.7 percent of the vote. Despite improving their results slightly and thus gaining a few more seats, the Left and the Greens remained the two smallest parties in parliament.
Party | Party-list | Constituency | Total seats | +/– | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Seats | Votes | % | Seats | ||||
Christian Democratic Union | 12,447,656 | 26.76 | 15 | 14,030,751 | 30.25 | 185 | 200 | −65 | |
Social Democratic Party | 9,539,381 | 20.51 | 94 | 11,429,231 | 24.64 | 59 | 153 | −40 | |
Alternative for Germany | 5,878,115 | 12.64 | 91 | 5,317,499 | 11.46 | 3 | 94 | +94 | |
Free Democratic Party | 4,999,449 | 10.75 | 80 | 3,249,238 | 7.00 | 0 | 80 | +80 | |
The Left | 4,297,270 | 9.24 | 64 | 3,966,637 | 8.55 | 5 | 69 | +5 | |
Alliance 90/The Greens | 4,158,400 | 8.94 | 66 | 3,717,922 | 8.01 | 1 | 67 | +4 | |
Christian Social Union | 2,869,688 | 6.17 | 0 | 3,255,487 | 7.02 | 46 | 46 | −10 | |
Free Voters | 463,292 | 1.00 | 0 | 589,056 | 1.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Die PARTEI | 454,349 | 0.98 | 0 | 245,659 | 0.53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Human Environment Animal Protection | 374,179 | 0.80 | 0 | 22,917 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
National Democratic Party | 176,020 | 0.38 | 0 | 45,169 | 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Pirate Party Germany | 173,476 | 0.37 | 0 | 93,196 | 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Ecological Democratic Party | 144,809 | 0.31 | 0 | 166,228 | 0.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Basic Income Alliance | 97,539 | 0.21 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
V-Partei3 | 64,073 | 0.14 | 0 | 1,201 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | |
German Centre | 63,203 | 0.14 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Democracy in Motion | 60,914 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Bavaria Party | 58,037 | 0.12 | 0 | 62,622 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Alliance of German Democrats | 41,251 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Alliance for Human Rights, Animal and Nature Protection | 32,221 | 0.07 | 0 | 6,114 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | New | |
Marxist–Leninist Party | 29,785 | 0.06 | 0 | 35,760 | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Partei für Gesundheitsforschung | 23,404 | 0.05 | 0 | 1,537 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | |
Menschliche Welt | 11,661 | 0.03 | 0 | 2,205 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | |
German Communist Party | 11,558 | 0.02 | 0 | 7,517 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
The Grays – For All Generations | 10,009 | 0.02 | 0 | 4,300 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | New | |
From now... Democracy by Referendum | 9,631 | 0.02 | 0 | 6,316 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Bürgerrechtsbewegung Solidarität | 6,693 | 0.01 | 0 | 15,960 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Party of Humanists | 5,991 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Magdeburg Garden Party | 5,617 | 0.01 | 0 | 2,570 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | New | |
Die Urbane. Eine HipHop Partei | 3,032 | 0.01 | 0 | 772 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | |
The Right | 2,054 | 0.00 | 0 | 1,142 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Socialist Equality Party | 1,291 | 0.00 | 0 | 903 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Bergpartei, die "ÜberPartei" | 911 | 0.00 | 0 | 672 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Party of Reason | 533 | 0.00 | 0 | 242 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Independents for Citizen-oriented Democracy | 2,458 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
The Violets | 2,176 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Alliance C – Christians for Germany | 1,717 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Renter's Party | 1,352 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
New Liberals | 884 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Family Party | 506 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Feminist Party | 439 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Die Einheit | 371 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | New | ||||
Independents and voter groups | 100,889 | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total | 46,515,492 | 100.00 | 410 | 46,389,615 | 100.00 | 299 | 709 | +78 | |
Valid votes | 46,515,492 | 99.02 | 46,389,615 | 98.75 | |||||
Invalid/blank votes | 460,849 | 0.98 | 586,726 | 1.25 | |||||
Total votes | 46,976,341 | 100.00 | 46,976,341 | 100.00 | |||||
Registered voters/turnout | 61,688,485 | 76.15 | 61,688,485 | 76.15 | |||||
Source: Bundeswahlleiter |
Results by constituency
editBelow are first votes (Erststimme) by constituency.[9]
State | Constituency ("Wahlkreis") | CDU/CSU | SPD | AfD | FDP | Linke | Grüne | Others | Lead |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baden-Württemberg | Aalen-Heidenheim | 46.4 | 21.0 | 11.0 | 6.1 | 5.2 | 9.6 | 0.7 | 25.4 |
Backnang-Schwäbisch Gmünd | 41.2 | 20.0 | 13.2 | 8.1 | 5.6 | 11.3 | 0.6 | 21.2 | |
Biberach | 44.5 | 16.9 | 11.3 | 7.5 | 3.8 | 13.5 | 2.5 | 27.6 | |
Böblingen | 38.8 | 19.6 | 11.2 | 12.8 | 5.0 | 11.9 | 0.7 | 19.2 | |
Bodensee | 41.4 | 18.0 | 10.4 | 8.8 | 5.3 | 13.9 | 2.3 | 23.4 | |
Bruchsal-Schwetzingen | 41.5 | 19.5 | 14.4 | 6.7 | 4.6 | 8.3 | 5.0 | 22.0 | |
Calw | 43.3 | 16.9 | 14.1 | 9.3 | 4.5 | 8.8 | 3.1 | 26.4 | |
Emmendingen-Lahr | 37.6 | 23.7 | 10.8 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 11.1 | 2.9 | 15.7 | |
Esslingen | 40.0 | 19.2 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 5.9 | 15.3 | 0.3 | 20.8 | |
Freiburg | 28.0 | 22.7 | 7.2 | 5.3 | 7.3 | 25.7 | 3.7 | 2.3 | |
Göppingen | 37.6 | 21.9 | 14.5 | 9.2 | 4.4 | 12.1 | 0.3 | 15.7 | |
Heidelberg | 32.7 | 26.0 | 8.9 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 16.7 | 3.0 | 6.7 | |
Heilbronn | 35.3 | 23.2 | 15.6 | 9.6 | 4.6 | 8.1 | 3.6 | 12.1 | |
Karlsruhe-Land | 40.4 | 19.7 | 11.7 | 9.1 | 4.6 | 11.4 | 3.1 | 20.7 | |
Karlsruhe-Stadt | 28.5 | 23.6 | 10.0 | 8.6 | 7.6 | 17.6 | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
Konstanz | 44.8 | 16.8 | 9.6 | 7.3 | 7.0 | 13.4 | 1.2 | 28.0 | |
Lörrach-Müllheim | 39.4 | 21.1 | 9.6 | 8.7 | 5.0 | 15.0 | 1.2 | 18.3 | |
Ludwigsburg | 38.3 | 17.8 | 11.6 | 10.2 | 5.5 | 14.2 | 2.4 | 20.5 | |
Mannheim | 29.3 | 27.9 | 12.5 | 6.9 | 7.4 | 13.1 | 2.9 | 1.4 | |
Neckar-Zaber | 40.0 | 19.7 | 12.6 | 8.8 | 4.6 | 12.5 | 1.9 | 20.3 | |
Nürtingen | 39.4 | 19.0 | 11.9 | 9.9 | 4.8 | 14.8 | 0.2 | 20.4 | |
Odenwald-Tauber | 46.8 | 19.1 | 13.6 | 7.1 | 5.2 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 27.7 | |
Offenburg | 48.1 | 17.3 | 10.4 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 12.6 | 0.0 | 30.8 | |
Pforzheim | 36.4 | 19.0 | 15.8 | 11.9 | 4.7 | 9.6 | 2.5 | 17.4 | |
Rastatt | 44.1 | 19.0 | 12.2 | 7.2 | 4.6 | 10.9 | 2.0 | 25.1 | |
Ravensburg | 38.5 | 12.4 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 5.4 | 20.2 | 4.0 | 18.3 | |
Reutlingen | 40.8 | 15.0 | 12.0 | 10.0 | 6.2 | 14.3 | 1.7 | 25.8 | |
Rhein-Neckar | 37.4 | 23.9 | 13.1 | 8.1 | 5.2 | 9.6 | 2.7 | 13.5 | |
Rottweil-Tuttlingen | 43.0 | 15.9 | 13.0 | 10.8 | 3.9 | 9.5 | 3.8 | 27.1 | |
Schwäbisch Hall - Hohenlohe | 40.5 | 18.5 | 13.5 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 12.6 | 2.2 | 22.0 | |
Schwarzwald-Baar | 47.0 | 16.7 | 11.4 | 8.4 | 4.3 | 9.8 | 2.4 | 30.3 | |
Stuttgart I | 32.0 | 12.8 | 6.7 | 8.4 | 6.5 | 29.7 | 3.9 | 2.3 | |
Stuttgart II | 33.5 | 18.5 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 15.9 | 4.2 | 15.0 | |
Tübingen | 35.7 | 17.3 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 8.8 | 19.1 | 2.6 | 16.6 | |
Ulm | 42.7 | 20.2 | 10.7 | 8.1 | 4.6 | 12.0 | 1.8 | 22.5 | |
Waiblingen | 36.8 | 19.2 | 12.4 | 13.4 | 4.9 | 12.2 | 1.1 | 17.6 | |
Waldshut | 41.9 | 24.1 | 9.2 | 6.2 | 5.0 | 11.9 | 1.8 | 17.8 | |
Zollernalb-Sigamaringen | 45.0 | 14.4 | 13.6 | 9.3 | 4.7 | 12.7 | 0.3 | 30.6 | |
Total | 39.3 | 19.5 | 11.5 | 8.6 | 5.4 | 13.4 | 2.2 | 19.8 | |
Bavaria | Altötting | 54.5 | 12.3 | 13.1 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 6.0 | 3.5 | 41.4 |
Erding – Ebersberg | 48.2 | 14.9 | 10.3 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 10.2 | 5.1 | 33.3 | |
Freising | 43.0 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 7.2 | 5.0 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 29.5 | |
Fürstenfeldbruck | 43.6 | 18.7 | 10.2 | 7.2 | 4.1 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 24.9 | |
Ingolstadt | 49.5 | 13.6 | 13.0 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 35.9 | |
München-Nord | 32.2 | 26.0 | 7.6 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 13.1 | 5.4 | 6.2 | |
München-Ost | 36.8 | 21.3 | 7.4 | 8.9 | 6.3 | 15.2 | 4.1 | 15.5 | |
München-Süd | 33.0 | 23.5 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 7.4 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 9.5 | |
München-West/Mitte | 33.3 | 23.1 | 6.7 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 16.3 | 4.5 | 10.2 | |
München-Land | 43.5 | 16.3 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 3.9 | 13.7 | 4.8 | 27.2 | |
Rosenheim | 45.9 | 11.8 | 13.0 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 9.4 | 8.6 | 32.9 | |
Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen – Miesbach | 47.6 | 11.3 | 9.9 | 8.2 | 5.3 | 13.6 | 4.2 | 34.0 | |
Starnberg – Landsberg am Lech | 42.1 | 16.7 | 8.9 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 11.9 | 6.9 | 25.4 | |
Traunstein | 50.3 | 16.1 | 10.2 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 8.1 | 5.1 | 34.2 | |
Weilheim | 47.6 | 14.8 | 10.1 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 32.8 | |
Deggendorf | 44.1 | 17.4 | 17.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 8.6 | 26.7 | |
Landshut | 39.6 | 13.6 | 12.6 | 8.5 | 3.6 | 6.5 | 15.6 | 24.0 | |
Passau | 47.5 | 18.9 | 14.1 | 6.1 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 28.6 | |
Passau | 45.0 | 14.4 | 15.1 | 7.0 | 3.9 | 4.9 | 9.7 | 28.6 | |
Straubing | 47.6 | 16.8 | 15.0 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 8.8 | 30.8 | |
Amberg | 47.7 | 15.2 | 11.2 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 6.9 | 9.5 | 32.5 | |
Regensburg | 40.1 | 16.7 | 11.8 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 9.3 | 9.9 | 23.4 | |
Schwandorf | 48.5 | 24.2 | 0.0 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 3.9 | 13.9 | 24.3 | |
Weiden | 46.2 | 22.3 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 19.3 | 23.9 | |
Bamberg | 42.1 | 20.4 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 9.2 | 5.1 | 21.7 | |
Bayreuth | 46.5 | 21.2 | 9.4 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 18.9 | |
Coburg | 45.3 | 26.4 | 10.5 | 4.8 | 5.2 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 18.9 | |
Hof | 47.0 | 23.6 | 11.8 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 23.4 | |
Kulmbach | 55.4 | 16.1 | 11.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 39.3 | |
Ansbach | 44.3 | 18.4 | 10.5 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 7.6 | 9.0 | 25.9 | |
Erlangen | 42.7 | 21.0 | 7.9 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 11.0 | 5.6 | 21.7 | |
Fürth | 39.9 | 22.9 | 10.6 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 9.7 | 4.8 | 17.0 | |
Nürnberg-Nord | 31.3 | 25.6 | 9.2 | 7.2 | 10.0 | 12.7 | 4.0 | 5.7 | |
Nürnberg-Süd | 45.6 | 26.5 | 13.2 | 5.8 | 8.2 | 7.8 | 2.8 | 19.1 | |
Roth | 34.5 | 20.6 | 10.3 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 7.9 | 7.3 | 13.9 | |
Aschaffenburg | 48.1 | 16.6 | 10.5 | 8.0 | 5.8 | 9.2 | 2.9 | 31.5 | |
Bad Kissingen | 51.1 | 19.1 | 10.5 | 5.6 | 5.4 | 7.1 | 1.2 | 32.0 | |
Main-Spessart | 46.6 | 22.6 | 9.1 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 24.0 | |
Schweinfurt | 47.9 | 17.1 | 11.1 | 6.2 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 2.4 | 30.8 | |
Würzburg | 42.2 | 18.7 | 7.7 | 8.0 | 5.6 | 14.0 | 3.8 | 23.5 | |
Augsburg-Stadt | 34.8 | 19.3 | 13.3 | 6.1 | 8.5 | 13.9 | 4.2 | 15.5 | |
Augsburg-Land | 47.8 | 14.1 | 12.3 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 7.5 | 8.6 | 33.7 | |
Donau-Ries | 47.0 | 18.1 | 12.8 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 6.4 | 6.4 | 28.9 | |
Neu-Ulm | 44.6 | 14.6 | 13.6 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 9.2 | 7.6 | 30.0 | |
Oberallgäu | 50.5 | 12.2 | 9.6 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 9.2 | 6.8 | 38.3 | |
Ostallgäu | 49.2 | 11.4 | 12.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 8.7 | 7.1 | 36.6 | |
Total | 44.2 | 18.1 | 10.5 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 26.1 | |
Berlin | Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf | 30.2 | 27.6 | 7.5 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 13.6 | 2.4 | 2.6 |
Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg – Prenzlauer Berg Ost | 12.2 | 16.9 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 24.9 | 26.3 | 10.4 | 1.4 | |
Lichtenberg | 19.7 | 14.1 | 15.7 | 3.4 | 34.8 | 5.9 | 6.4 | 15.1 | |
Marzahn-Hellersdorf | 22.3 | 12.6 | 20.6 | 3.5 | 34.2 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 11.9 | |
Mitte | 18.6 | 23.5 | 7.9 | 6.0 | 20.5 | 18.0 | 5.6 | 3.0 | |
Neukölln | 24.5 | 26.8 | 10.7 | 5.1 | 16.4 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 2.3 | |
Pankow | 19.6 | 16.4 | 12.1 | 4.2 | 28.8 | 14.2 | 4.8 | 9.2 | |
Reinickendorf | 36.8 | 23.6 | 13.2 | 7.2 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 3.6 | 13.2 | |
Spandau-Charlottenburg Nord | 30.9 | 32.1 | 13.4 | 6.4 | 7.6 | 6.2 | 3.4 | 1.2 | |
Steglitz-Zehlendorf | 35.4 | 24.6 | 8.2 | 9.1 | 7.5 | 12.7 | 2.6 | 10.8 | |
Tempelhof-Schöneberg | 28.9 | 22.0 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 10.8 | 18.9 | 3.9 | 6.9 | |
Treptow-Köpenick | 18.9 | 13.8 | 15.0 | 3.8 | 39.9 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 21.0 | |
Total | 24.7 | 21.0 | 11.4 | 5.6 | 20.2 | 12.4 | 4.7 | 3.7 | |
Brandenburg | Prignitz – Ostprignitz-Ruppin – Havelland I | 30.8 | 23.7 | 18.0 | 3.6 | 17.6 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 7.1 |
Uckermark – Barnim I | 30.6 | 19.4 | 20.2 | 3.8 | 18.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 10.4 | |
Oberhavel – Havelland II | 29.9 | 22.7 | 18.0 | 5.2 | 14.7 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 7.2 | |
Märkisch-Oderland – Barnim II | 28.4 | 15.8 | 20.2 | 4.2 | 22.5 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 5.9 | |
Brandenburg an der Havel – Potsdam-Mittelmark I – Havelland III – Teltow-Fläming I | 31.8 | 25.1 | 26.9 | 4.6 | 15.1 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 4.9 | |
Potsdam – Potsdam-Mittelmark II – Teltow-Fläming II | 25.9 | 26.1 | 12.3 | 7.5 | 16.5 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 0.2 | |
Dahme-Spreewald – Teltow-Fläming III – Oberspreewald-Lausitz I | 30.7 | 19.6 | 20.3 | 4.8 | 16.4 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 10.4 | |
Frankfurt (Oder) – Oder-Spree | 27.1 | 17.1 | 21.9 | 5.1 | 19.1 | 3.3 | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
Cottbus – Spree-Neiße | 28.4 | 17.0 | 25.3 | 5.7 | 15.7 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 3.1 | |
Elbe-Elster – Oberspreewald-Lausitz II | 29.5 | 16.7 | 24.7 | 5.4 | 16.2 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
Total | 29.0 | 20.5 | 19.4 | 5.1 | 17.2 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 8.5 | |
Bremen | Bremen I | 24.2 | 30.0 | 7.7 | 11.2 | 12.2 | 11.9 | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Bremen II-Bremerhaven | 25.0 | 34.0 | 11.4 | 6.7 | 11.5 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 9.0 | |
Total | 24.6 | 31.8 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 11.9 | 10.1 | 3.2 | 7.2 | |
Hamburg | Altona | 25.9 | 28.9 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 13.6 | 14.4 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
Bergedorf-Harburg | 28.1 | 34.8 | 10.9 | 5.2 | 10.7 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 6.7 | |
Eimsbüttel | 28.7 | 31.6 | 5.7 | 6.8 | 10.4 | 15.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | |
Mitte | 24.2 | 30.9 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 13.9 | 12.9 | 4.4 | 6.7 | |
Nord | 33.5 | 30.8 | 5.5 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 13.6 | 0.7 | 2.7 | |
Wandsbek | 29.7 | 34.6 | 9.5 | 7.0 | 9.2 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 4.9 | |
Total | 28.5 | 32.0 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 10.8 | 11.7 | 2.6 | 3.5 | |
Hesse | Waldeck | 33.6 | 35.1 | 11.0 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
Kassel | 26.9 | 35.6 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 3.6 | 8.7 | |
Werra-Meißner – Hersfeld-Rotenburg | 29.9 | 41.2 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 11.3 | |
Schwalm-Eder | 30.4 | 37.7 | 12.0 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 2.3 | 7.3 | |
Marburg | 33.4 | 35.7 | 10.2 | 4.3 | 8.2 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | |
Lahn-Dill | 38.3 | 29.7 | 11.7 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 3.5 | 8.6 | |
Gießen | 35.1 | 28.2 | 11.5 | 7.7 | 6.3 | 8.3 | 2.9 | 6.9 | |
Fulda | 45.2 | 20.2 | 17.6 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 25.0 | |
Main-Kinzig – Wetterau II – Schotten | 36.4 | 28.3 | 14.8 | 6.1 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 3.0 | 8.1 | |
Hochtaunus | 39.9 | 23.0 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 5.9 | 8.9 | 1.4 | 16.9 | |
Wetterau I | 36.4 | 29.0 | 10.9 | 8.1 | 4.9 | 8.3 | 2.3 | 7.4 | |
Rheingau-Taunus – Limburg | 41.8 | 25.3 | 10.2 | 7.6 | 5.5 | 7.0 | 2.6 | 16.5 | |
Wiesbaden | 34.3 | 28.6 | 10.4 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 8.9 | 3.1 | 5.7 | |
Hanau | 35.3 | 30.4 | 12.8 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 4.9 | |
Main-Taunus | 41.9 | 21.8 | 9.7 | 10.9 | 5.0 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 20.1 | |
Frankfurt am Main I | 30.5 | 27.1 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 9.7 | 10.9 | 3.5 | 3.4 | |
Frankfurt am Main II | 32.4 | 25.9 | 7.6 | 8.1 | 9.1 | 13.5 | 3.3 | 6.5 | |
(electoral district)Groß-Gerau | 35.1 | 32.4 | 11.3 | 5.6 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 2.1 | 2.7 | |
Offenbach | 36.4 | 24.9 | 11.2 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 8.8 | 3.2 | 11.5 | |
Darmstadt | 30.7 | 29.7 | 9.1 | 6.2 | 8.5 | 14.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | |
Odenwald | 36.1 | 29.0 | 11.7 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 7.8 | 2.0 | 7.1 | |
Bergstraße | 38.9 | 26.9 | 12.5 | 7.6 | 5.5 | 7.6 | 0.9 | 12.0 | |
Total | 35.4 | 29.2 | 11.2 | 7.1 | 6.6 | 8.1 | 2.4 | 6.2 | |
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | Ludwigslust-Parchim II-Nordwestmecklenburg II-Landkreis Rostock I | 30.0 | 24.0 | 17.4 | 5.7 | 16.2 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 6.0 |
Mecklenburgische Seenplatte I-Vorpommern-Greifswald II | 31.2 | 13.9 | 23.5 | 5.8 | 19.1 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 7.7 | |
Mecklenburgische Seenplatte II-Landkreis Rostock III | 37.6 | 15.7 | 18.4 | 4.7 | 17.4 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 19.2 | |
Schwerin-Ludwigslust-Parchim I-Nordwestmecklenburg I | 32.1 | 22.1 | 16.0 | 4.8 | 17.2 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 10.0 | |
Rostock-Landkreis Rostock II | 29.5 | 17.9 | 14.7 | 4.5 | 24.8 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 4.7 | |
Vorpommern-Rügen-Vorpommern-Greifswald I | 44.0 | 11.6 | 19.2 | 3.1 | 15.9 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 24.8 | |
Total | 34.2 | 17.4 | 18.2 | 4.7 | 18.5 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 15.7 | |
Lower Saxony | Aurich – Emden | 27.6 | 49.6 | 0.0 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 4.1 | 22.0 |
Unterems | 50.0 | 28.0 | 7.7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 22.0 | |
Friesland – Wilhelmshaven – Wittmund | 32.4 | 39.7 | 8.3 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 7.3 | |
Oldenburg – Ammerland | 30.2 | 36.3 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 8.1 | 11.4 | 1.3 | 6.1 | |
Delmenhorst – Wesermarsch – Oldenburg-Land | 34.1 | 32.9 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 6.1 | 7.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | |
Cuxhaven – Stade II | 42.7 | 30.7 | 8.5 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 1.3 | 12.0 | |
Stade I – Rotenburg II | 44.4 | 28.2 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 16.2 | |
Mittelems | 53.6 | 26.4 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 27.2 | |
Cloppenburg – Vechta | 57.7 | 20.4 | 7.8 | 5.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 37.3 | |
Diepholz – Nienburg I | 44.6 | 27.3 | 8.1 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 17.3 | |
Osterholz – Verden | 39.2 | 32.0 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 1.0 | 7.2 | |
Rotenburg I – Heidekreis | 36.1 | 41.2 | 8.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 5.1 | |
Harburg | 40.6 | 27.4 | 9.2 | 6.5 | 5.4 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 13.2 | |
Lüchow-Dannenberg – Lüneburg | 33.5 | 28.1 | 8.7 | 6.6 | 8.4 | 14.8 | 0.0 | 5.4 | |
Osnabrück-Land | 45.6 | 28.3 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 5.3 | 7.7 | 0.2 | 17.3 | |
Stadt Osnabrück | 40.3 | 31.6 | 0.0 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 10.1 | 0.6 | 8.7 | |
Stadt Osnabrück | 40.6 | 32.7 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 7.7 | 0.8 | 7.9 | |
Stadt Hannover I | 29.6 | 35.6 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 9.1 | 3.4 | 6.0 | |
Stadt Hannover II | 28.9 | 33.7 | 7.2 | 5.5 | 9.3 | 11.2 | 4.2 | 4.8 | |
Hannover-Land I | 40.1 | 33.1 | 9.6 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 1.1 | 7.0 | |
Celle – Uelzen | 42.7 | 30.0 | 10.1 | 5.5 | 4.6 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 12.7 | |
Celle – Uelzen | 36.1 | 37.8 | 9.9 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 1.7 | |
Gifhorn – Peine | 33.4 | 39.1 | 9.5 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 5.7 | |
Hameln-Pyrmont – Holzminden | 35.2 | 37.0 | 9.4 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 | |
Hildesheim | 36.0 | 37.2 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 0.0 | 1.2 | |
Salzgitter – Wolfenbüttel | 29.1 | 42.8 | 11.9 | 4.7 | 6.0 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 13.7 | |
Braunschweig | 31.4 | 38.0 | 7.8 | 5.4 | 7.6 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 6.6 | |
Helmstedt – Wolfsburg | 34.9 | 38.0 | 10.2 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 0.7 | 3.1 | |
Goslar – Northeim – Osterode | 39.8 | 34.8 | 9.3 | 5.0 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 5.0 | |
Göttingen | 33.3 | 34.9 | 7.0 | 4.6 | 5.9 | 11.3 | 3.1 | 1.6 | |
Total | 38.3 | 33.6 | 8.0 | 5.7 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 1.3 | 5.7 | |
North Rhine-Westphalia | Aachen I | 33.7 | 32.5 | 5.6 | 7.3 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 1.2 |
Aachen II | 36.5 | 36.9 | 8.8 | 6.4 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 0.4 | |
Heinsberg | 45.6 | 28.0 | 8.3 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 17.6 | |
Düren | 41.9 | 31.7 | 8.9 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 10.2 | |
Rhein-Erft-Kreis I | 39.2 | 31.1 | 9.0 | 9.3 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 8.1 | |
Euskirchen – Rhein-Erft-Kreis II | 42.8 | 26.2 | 9.5 | 9.9 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 16.6 | |
Köln I | 31.6 | 31.0 | 8.6 | 7.7 | 8.6 | 9.8 | 2.7 | 0.6 | |
Köln II | 34.9 | 26.9 | 4.6 | 9.1 | 8.0 | 14.6 | 2.0 | 8.0 | |
Köln III | 27.6 | 23.3 | 7.5 | 7.1 | 9.7 | 13.2 | 2.6 | 4.3 | |
Bonn | 32.0 | 34.9 | 6.1 | 10.5 | 5.7 | 8.4 | 2.4 | 2.9 | |
Rhein-Sieg-Kreis I | 44.3 | 27.7 | 0.0 | 10.4 | 8.1 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 16.6 | |
Rhein-Sieg-Kreis II | 46.5 | 22.7 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 0.5 | 23.8 | |
Oberbergischer Kreis | 43.7 | 26.7 | 10.1 | 7.8 | 5.2 | 6.1 | 0.3 | 17.0 | |
Rheinisch-Bergischer Kreis | 40.0 | 24.4 | 7.2 | 15.7 | 4.9 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 15.6 | |
Leverkusen – Köln IV | 30.8 | 38.7 | 8.7 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 5.7 | 3.4 | 7.9 | |
Wuppertal I | 31.5 | 29.6 | 11.0 | 8.7 | 8.9 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | |
Solingen – Remscheid – Wuppertal II | 38.2 | 30.8 | 9.5 | 7.8 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 7.4 | |
Mettmann I | 44.6 | 25.7 | 8.9 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 18.9 | |
Mettmann II | 39.3 | 30.2 | 9.0 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 6.1 | 1.2 | 9.1 | |
Düsseldorf I | 40.4 | 24.4 | 6.4 | 12.8 | 7.4 | 8.4 | 0.2 | 16.0 | |
Düsseldorf II | 33.8 | 27.3 | 8.1 | 9.2 | 13.0 | 8.3 | 0.2 | 6.5 | |
Neuss I | 44.0 | 28.6 | 8.6 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 15.4 | |
Mönchengladbach | 44.3 | 24.4 | 9.1 | 7.8 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 19.9 | |
Krefeld I – Neuss II | 42.4 | 25.5 | 7.3 | 11.5 | 5.1 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 16.9 | |
Viersen | 47.9 | 25.0 | 7.0 | 8.3 | 5.1 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 22.9 | |
Kleve | 45.0 | 30.6 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 14.4 | |
Wesel I | 39.0 | 32.8 | 8.6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 0.2 | 6.2 | |
Krefeld II – Wesel II | 37.0 | 32.0 | 8.5 | 8.2 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 2.7 | 5.0 | |
Duisburg I | 28.7 | 38.3 | 11.5 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 9.6 | |
Duisburg II | 26.4 | 34.7 | 16.6 | 7.0 | 8.9 | 4.6 | 1.8 | 8.3 | |
Oberhausen – Wesel III | 29.1 | 38.5 | 12.3 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 9.4 | |
Mülheim – Essen I | 31.3 | 34.9 | 11.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 3.6 | |
Essen II | 26.6 | 37.3 | 15.8 | 6.6 | 7.9 | 5.4 | 0.4 | 10.7 | |
Essen III | 37.1 | 30.8 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 6.5 | 8.2 | 1.0 | 6.3 | |
Recklinghausen I | 30.9 | 38.7 | 11.4 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 7.8 | |
Recklinghausen II | 34.5 | 41.1 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 6.6 | |
Gelsenkirchen | 25.4 | 38.3 | 16.9 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 12.9 | |
Steinfurt I – Borken I | 51.3 | 25.8 | 6.0 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 25.5 | |
Bottrop – Recklinghausen III | 33.6 | 36.8 | 11.8 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 3.2 | |
Borken II | 52.3 | 25.3 | 0.0 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 2.0 | 27.0 | |
Coesfeld – Steinfurt II | 51.6 | 23.5 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 6.2 | 8.2 | 0.0 | 28.1 | |
Steinfurt III | 44.8 | 30.3 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 14.5 | |
Münster | 37.2 | 28.9 | 4.5 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 12.8 | 2.8 | 8.3 | |
Warendorf | 46.4 | 27.9 | 6.9 | 7.0 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 18.5 | |
Gütersloh I | 46.6 | 28.0 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 4.3 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 18.6 | |
Bielefeld – Gütersloh II | 30.7 | 33.2 | 8.2 | 7.3 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | |
Herford – Minden-Lübbecke II | 35.8 | 36.7 | 10.0 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | |
Minden-Lübbecke I | 37.4 | 35.5 | 9.9 | 7.1 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 0.0 | 1.9 | |
Lippe I | 36.6 | 32.1 | 10.2 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 4.5 | |
Höxter – Lippe II | 44.3 | 26.7 | 9.1 | 6.9 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 17.6 | |
Paderborn – Gütersloh III | 53.3 | 19.9 | 9.1 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 33.4 | |
Hagen – Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis I | 30.3 | 39.2 | 11.3 | 7.9 | 5.4 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 8.9 | |
Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis II | 32.9 | 36.7 | 0.0 | 10.5 | 8.0 | 8.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 | |
Bochum I | 28.2 | 37.2 | 9.5 | 7.0 | 10.0 | 7.7 | 0.3 | 9.0 | |
Herne – Bochum II | 24.1 | 41.9 | 13.4 | 6.7 | 8.0 | 5.6 | 0.3 | 17.8 | |
Dortmund I | 28.6 | 38.8 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 7.7 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 10.2 | |
Dortmund II | 28.1 | 38.8 | 10.6 | 6.4 | 8.6 | 6.4 | 1.1 | 10.7 | |
Unna I | 31.8 | 38.8 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 2.1 | 7.0 | |
Hamm – Unna II | 35.2 | 36.4 | 10.4 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | |
Soest | 42.7 | 29.3 | 8.9 | 7.9 | 5.7 | 5.5 | 0.1 | 13.4 | |
Hochsauerlandkreis | 48.0 | 26.9 | 7.3 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 21.1 | |
Siegen-Wittgenstein | 40.1 | 30.2 | 9.8 | 7.3 | 5.9 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 9.9 | |
Olpe – Märkischer Kreis I | 47.9 | 26.3 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 21.6 | |
Märkischer Kreis II | 37.8 | 38.6 | 0.0 | 10.7 | 7.8 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 | |
Total | 38.3 | 31.3 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 1.3 | 7.0 | |
Rhineland-Palatinate | Neuwied | 43.2 | 28.6 | 9.5 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 1.9 | 14.6 |
Ahrweiler | 42.8 | 27.4 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 15.4 | |
Koblenz | 41.3 | 28.7 | 8.2 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 6.2 | 3.9 | 12.6 | |
Mosel/Rhein-Hunsrück | 44.1 | 25.2 | 8.2 | 8.7 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 18.9 | |
Kreuznach | 37.0 | 31.5 | 10.8 | 6.8 | 5.53 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 5.5 | |
Bitburg | 51.2 | 25.7 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 25.5 | |
Trier | 37.9 | 33.7 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 3.1 | 4.2 | |
Montabaur | 43.3 | 29.8 | 0.0 | 9.2 | 7.0 | 5.2 | 5.5 | 13.5 | |
Mainz | 35.7 | 28.0 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 10.8 | 4.8 | 17.7 | |
Worms | 41.1 | 26.7 | 11.3 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 6.7 | 3.1 | 14.4 | |
Ludwigshafen/Frankenthal | 32.1 | 31.9 | 14.5 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 10.2 | |
Neustadt – Speyer | 40.0 | 25.3 | 11.9 | 6.8 | 4.7 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 14.7 | |
Kaiserslautern | 31.3 | 33.9 | 12.6 | 5.5 | 7.2 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 2.6 | |
Pirmasens | 33.8 | 28.8 | 12.8 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 5.0 | |
Südpfalz | 40.3 | 26.0 | 12.3 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 7.9 | 2.7 | 14.3 | |
Total | 39.6 | 28.8 | 9.5 | 6.9 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 10.8 | |
Saarland | Homburg | 33.6 | 31.4 | 11.0 | 5.1 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 2.2 |
Saarbrücken | 31.4 | 32.1 | 8.9 | 5.3 | 13.3 | 6.0 | 2.9 | 0.7 | |
Saarlouis | 38.0 | 32.1 | 9.0 | 3.8 | 10.8 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 5.9 | |
St. Wendel | 41.8 | 30.4 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 9.8 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 11.4 | |
Total | 36.2 | 31.5 | 9.3 | 4.7 | 11.2 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 4.7 | |
Saxony | Nordsachsen | 32.8 | 14.0 | 26.8 | 6.6 | 17.2 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 6.0 |
Leipzig I | 27.5 | 16.5 | 20.5 | 5.7 | 19.5 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 7.0 | |
Leipzig II | 24.6 | 13.7 | 15.0 | 5.8 | 25.3 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 0.7 | |
Leipzig-Land | 34.1 | 11.5 | 28.7 | 6.3 | 15.6 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 5.4 | |
Meißen | 36.7 | 8.9 | 31.0 | 5.3 | 12.7 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 5.7 | |
Bautzen I | 30.6 | 10.0 | 33.2 | 5.8 | 15.2 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.6 | |
Görlitz | 31.4 | 10.9 | 32.4 | 5.0 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 1.0 | |
Sächsische Schweiz-Osterzgebirge | 28.8 | 7.2 | 37.4 | 6.5 | 14.7 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 8.6 | |
Dresden I | 24.6 | 13.2 | 22.4 | 7.5 | 21.0 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 2.2 | |
Dresden II – Bautzen II | 25.5 | 11.1 | 22.3 | 7.0 | 17.5 | 8.6 | 7.9 | 3.2 | |
Mittelsachsen | 32.4 | 12.0 | 31.5 | 5.8 | 14.0 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | |
Chemnitz | 26.6 | 15.4 | 24.0 | 6.6 | 19.4 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 2.6 | |
Chemnitzer Umland – Erzgebirgskreis II | 35.1 | 10.3 | 26.6 | 7.6 | 17.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 8.5 | |
Erzgebirgskreis I | 34.7 | 9.0 | 30.2 | 7.2 | 15.2 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 4.5 | |
Zwickau | 33.7 | 12.7 | 0.0 | 13.4 | 25.7 | 4.5 | 9.9 | 8.0 | |
Vogtlandkreis | 35.0 | 11.1 | 26.0 | 5.6 | 15.5 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 9.0 | |
Total | 30.6 | 11.7 | 25.4 | 6.7 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 5.2 | |
Saxony-Anhalt | Altmark | 32.6 | 19.1 | 16.5 | 6.7 | 19.2 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 13.4 |
Börde – Jerichower Land | 37.8 | 20.0 | 20.3 | 0.0 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 11.9 | 17.5 | |
Harz | 36.4 | 17.5 | 16.1 | 4.9 | 19.2 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 17.2 | |
Magdeburg | 27.4 | 21.7 | 15.3 | 6.7 | 18.9 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.7 | |
Dessau – Wittenberg | 35.2 | 12.2 | 19.4 | 5.0 | 18.2 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 15.8 | |
Anhalt | 31.6 | 12.9 | 22.2 | 6.3 | 21.2 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 9.4 | |
Halle | 27.1 | 21.3 | 17.3 | 6.7 | 20.3 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 5.8 | |
Burgenland – Saalekreis | 33.6 | 13.1 | 23.4 | 6.6 | 16.9 | 2.5 | 3.9 | 10.2 | |
Mansfeld | 31.0 | 15.2 | 23.9 | 8.1 | 18.1 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 7.1 | |
Total | 32.4 | 17.2 | 16.9 | 6.5 | 19.2 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 13.2 | |
Schleswig-Holstein | Flensburg – Schleswig | 40.0 | 28.0 | 6.2 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 10.5 | 1.6 | 12.0 |
Nordfriesland – Dithmarschen Nord | 45.1 | 25.2 | 5.9 | 8.1 | 5.2 | 9.4 | 1.2 | 19.9 | |
Steinburg – Dithmarschen Süd | 41.9 | 26.1 | 7.6 | 11.0 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 1.1 | 15.8 | |
Rendsburg-Eckernförde | 42.7 | 28.9 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 13.8 | |
Kiel | 30.7 | 31.0 | 6.1 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 14.3 | 3.0 | 0.3 | |
Plön – Neumünster | 40.7 | 28.9 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 11.8 | |
Pinneberg | 39.7 | 30.3 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 6.1 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 9.4 | |
Segeberg – Stormarn-Mitte | 41.1 | 27.3 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 13.8 | |
Ostholstein – Stormarn-Nord | 41.5 | 30.8 | 7.9 | 7.3 | 4.4 | 6.9 | 1.2 | 10.7 | |
Herzogtum Lauenburg – Stormarn-Süd | 39.5 | 27.2 | 9.1 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 9.7 | 1.1 | 12.3 | |
Lübeck | 35.3 | 33.9 | 8.7 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 13.0 | 2.7 | 1.4 | |
Total | 39.8 | 28.8 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 5.3 | 9.5 | 1.3 | 11.0 | |
Thuringia | Eichsfeld-Nordhausen-Kyffhäuserkreis | 38.0 | 14.3 | 21.4 | 4.9 | 15.3 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 16.6 |
Eisenach-Wartburgkreis-Unstrut-Hainich-Kreis | 34.4 | 15.2 | 21.2 | 5.0 | 15.5 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 13.2 | |
Erfurt-Weimar-Weimarer Land II | 27.3 | 18.2 | 17.5 | 6.0 | 18.7 | 7.1 | 5.3 | 8.6 | |
Gera-Greiz-Altenburger Land | 30.4 | 11.8 | 27.3 | 5.6 | 18.7 | 2.1 | 4.0 | 3.1 | |
Gotha-Ilm-Kreis | 29.0 | 18.6 | 23.9 | 6.0 | 15.6 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 5.1 | |
Jena-Sömmerda-Weimarer Land I | 29.2 | 14.2 | 19.3 | 5.8 | 21.4 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 7.8 | |
Saalfeld-Rudolstadt-Saale-Holzland-Kreis-Saale-Orla-Kreis | 30.9 | 11.7 | 26.5 | 6.1 | 17.1 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
Suhl-Schmalkalden-Meiningen-Hildburghausen-Sonneberg | 33.5 | 13.5 | 22.8 | 4.9 | 18.3 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 10.7 | |
Total | 31.6 | 14.6 | 22.5 | 5.5 | 17.6 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 9.1 |
Results by state
editSecond Vote ("Zweitstimme", or votes for party list) by state[10]
State | CDU/CSU | SPD | AfD | FDP | Linke | Grüne | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baden-Württemberg | 34.4 | 16.4 | 12.2 | 12.7 | 6.4 | 13.5 | 4.5 |
Bavaria | 38.8 | 15.3 | 12.4 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 9.8 | 7.5 |
Berlin | 22.7 | 17.9 | 12.0 | 8.9 | 18.8 | 12.6 | 7.0 |
Brandenburg [c] | 26.7 | 17.6 | 20.2 | 7.1 | 17.2 | 5.0 | 6.3 |
Bremen | 25.0 | 26.3 | 10.0 | 9.3 | 13.5 | 11.0 | 4.3 |
Hamburg | 27.2 | 23.5 | 7.8 | 10.8 | 12.2 | 13.9 | 4.5 |
Hesse | 30.9 | 23.5 | 11.9 | 11.6 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 4.4 |
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern [d] | 33.1 | 15.1 | 18.6 | 6.2 | 17.8 | 4.3 | 4.9 |
Lower Saxony | 34.9 | 27.4 | 9.1 | 9.3 | 6.9 | 8.7 | 3.6 |
North Rhine-Westphalia | 32.6 | 26.0 | 9.4 | 13.1 | 7.5 | 7.6 | 3.8 |
Rhineland-Palatinate | 35.9 | 24.2 | 11.2 | 10.4 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 3.9 |
Saarland | 32.4 | 27.2 | 10.1 | 7.6 | 12.9 | 6.0 | 3.9 |
Saxony [e] | 26.9 | 10.5 | 27.0 | 8.2 | 16.1 | 4.6 | 6.7 |
Saxony-Anhalt [f] | 30.3 | 15.2 | 19.6 | 7.8 | 17.8 | 3.7 | 5.7 |
Schleswig-Holstein | 34.0 | 23.3 | 8.2 | 12.6 | 7.3 | 12.0 | 2.7 |
Thuringia [g] | 28.8 | 13.2 | 22.7 | 7.8 | 16.9 | 4.1 | 6.5 |
-
CDU-CSU vote
-
SPD vote
-
AfD vote
-
FDP vote
-
Linke vote
-
Grüne vote
-
NPD vote
-
Turnout
Constituency seats
editState | Total seats |
Seats won | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDU | SPD | CSU | Linke | AfD | Grüne | ||
Baden-Württemberg | 38 | 38 | |||||
Bavaria | 46 | 46 | |||||
Berlin | 12 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | ||
Brandenburg | 10 | 9 | 1 | ||||
Bremen | 2 | 2 | |||||
Hamburg | 6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
Hesse | 22 | 17 | 5 | ||||
Lower Saxony | 30 | 16 | 14 | ||||
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 6 | 6 | |||||
North Rhine-Westphalia | 64 | 38 | 26 | ||||
Rhineland-Palatinate | 15 | 14 | 1 | ||||
Saarland | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
Saxony | 16 | 12 | 1 | 3 | |||
Saxony-Anhalt | 9 | 9 | |||||
Schleswig-Holstein | 11 | 10 | 1 | ||||
Thuringia | 8 | 8 | |||||
Total | 299 | 185 | 59 | 46 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
List seats
editState | Total seats |
Seats won[10] | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPD | AfD | FDP | Grüne | Linke | CDU | ||
Baden-Württemberg | 58 | 16 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 6 | |
Bavaria | 62 | 18 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 7 | |
Berlin | 16 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Brandenburg | 15 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Bremen | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Hamburg | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
Hesse | 28 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | |
Lower Saxony | 36 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 10 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
North Rhine-Westphalia | 78 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 12 | 4 |
Rhineland-Palatinate | 22 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | |
Saarland | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Saxony | 22 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Saxony-Anhalt | 14 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Schleswig-Holstein | 15 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | |
Thuringia | 14 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
Total | 410 | 94 | 91 | 80 | 66 | 64 | 15 |
Constitution of the 19th Bundestag
editOn 24 October 2017 the 19th Bundestag held its opening session, during which the Bundestag-members elected the Presidium of the Bundestag, i.e. the President and the Vice Presidents of the Bundestag. By tradition the biggest parliamentary group (in this case the CDU/CSU-group) has the right to propose a candidate for President of the Bundestag and following the rules of order every group has the right to be represented by at least one Vice President in the presidium. However, the Bundestag may decide to elect additional Vice Presidents. Every member of the presidium had to be elected by an absolute majority of the members of the Bundestag (in this case 355 votes). Until the election of the President of the Bundestag, the father of the house, the member of parliament with the longest membership, presided over the opening session.[11]
- Since he had been a member of the Bundestag for 45 years (since 1972), Wolfgang Schäuble would have been the father of the house.[12] However, since Schäuble was also a candidate for President of the Bundestag and would therefore likely have had to declare his own election, he refused the office. Hermann Otto Solms, who had been a member of the Bundestag for 33 years (1980–2013 and since 2017), stood in for him.[13][14]
- The CDU/CSU group proposed Wolfgang Schäuble to be President of the Bundestag.[15] Schäuble was elected on the first ballot (501 yes votes, 173 no votes, 30 abstentions, 1 invalid vote).
- The CDU/CSU group proposed Hans-Peter Friedrich to be a Vice President of the Bundestag.[16] Friedrich was elected on the first ballot (507 yes votes, 112 no votes, 82 abstentions, 2 invalid votes).
- The SPD group proposed Thomas Oppermann to be a Vice President of the Bundestag. Oppermann was elected on the first ballot (396 yes votes, 220 no votes, 81 abstentions, 6 invalid votes).
- The AfD group proposed Albrecht Glaser to be a Vice President of the Bundestag.[17] On 2 October 2017 the groups of the SPD, the FDP, The Left and Alliance 90/The Greens criticised the nomination because of controversial remarks about Islam and the basic right of religious freedom made by Glaser during the AfD's election campaign and asked the AfD group to nominate someone else to the post. The AfD group declined to accede to the request and nominate someone else.[18] Glaser failed to get a majority on three ballots, although even a plurality would have been sufficient on the third (first ballot: 115 yes votes, 550 no votes, 26 abstentions, 12 invalid votes, second ballot: 123 yes votes, 549 no votes, 24 abstentions, 1 invalid vote, third ballot: 114 yes votes, 545 no votes, 26 abstentions).
- The FDP group proposed Wolfgang Kubicki to be a Vice President of the Bundestag. Kubicki was elected on the first ballot (489 yes votes, 100 no votes, 111 abstentions, 3 invalid votes).
- The Left group proposed Petra Pau, who has held this position since 2006, to be a Vice President of the Bundestag. Pau was elected on the first ballot (456 yes votes, 187 no votes, 54 abstentions, 6 invalid votes).
- The Alliance 90/Greens group proposed Claudia Roth, who already held this position in the previous legislative session, to be a Vice President of the Bundestag.[19] Roth was elected on the first ballot (489 yes votes, 166 no votes, 45 abstentions, 3 invalid votes).
The AfD's seat in the Presidium has remained vacant since the first session. On 7 November 2018, the AfD-group nominated Mariana Harder-Kühnel to the post.[20] Harder-Kühnel failed to secure a majority on the first ballot on 29 November 2018 (223 yes votes, 387 no votes, 44 abstentions), on the second ballot on 12 December 2018 (241 yes votes, 377 no votes, 41 abstentions), or on the third ballot on 4 April 2019 (199 yes votes, 423 no votes, 43 abstentions)[21][22][23] On 9 April 2019, the AfD nominated Gerold Otten to the post; however, he has failed to secure a majority on the first ballot on 11 April 2019 (210 yes votes, 393 no votes, 31 abstentions),[24][25] on the second ballot on 16 May 2019 (205 yes votes, 399 no votes, 26 abstentions),[26] or on the third ballot on 6 June 2019 (211 yes votes, 426 no votes, 30 abstentions).[27]
Government formation
editJamaica coalition
editThe SPD's leader and Chancellor candidate Martin Schulz and other party leaders stated that the SPD would not continue the incumbent grand coalition government after unsatisfactory election results.[28] Following the SPD's announcement that it would return to the opposition, the media speculated that incumbent chancellor Angela Merkel might need to form a Jamaica coalition (black-yellow-green) with the FDP and the Greens as that was the only viable coalition without the AfD or The Left, both of which had been ruled out by Merkel as coalition partners before the election.[29] On 9 October 2017, Merkel officially announced that she would invite the Free Democrats and the Greens for talks about building a coalition government starting on 18 October 2017.[30][31]
In the final days of the preliminary talks, the four parties had still failed to come to agreement on migration and climate issues.[32] Preliminary talks between the parties collapsed on 20 November after the FDP withdrew, arguing that the talks had failed to produce a common vision or trust.[33]
Grand coalition
editAfter the collapse of these coalition talks, the German President appealed to the SPD to change their hard stance and to consider a grand coalition with the CDU/CSU.[34] On 24 November, Schulz said he wants party members to be polled on whether to form another grand coalition with CDU/CSU after a meeting with President Frank-Walter Steinmeier the day before.[35] According to CDU deputy leader Julia Klöckner, talks were unlikely to begin until early 2018.[36] On 6 December the SPD held a party congress in which a majority of the 600 party delegates voted to start preliminary coalition talks with the CDU/CSU.[37] This decision was met with reluctance by the party's youth wing, which organised protests outside the convention hall.[38] Martin Schulz's backing of the coalition talks was interpreted by media organisations as a U-turn, as he had previously ruled out considering a grand coalition.[39][40][41]
On 12 January, the CDU/CSU and the SPD announced that they had reached a breakthrough in the preliminary talks and agreed upon an outline document to begin formal negotiations for the grand coalition.[42] On 21 January, the SPD held an extraordinary party conference of 642 delegates in Bonn.[43] The conference voted in favour of accepting the conclusion of preliminary talks and launching formal coalition negotiations with the CDU/CSU.[44] The formal coalition talks finally began on 26 January.[45][46]
On 7 February, the CDU/CSU and SPD announced that the final coalition agreement had been reached between the parties to form the next government.[47] According to terms of the agreement, the SPD received six ministries in the new government including the finance, foreign affairs and labour portfolios while the CDU received five and the CSU three ministries. The agreement stipulated there would be rises in public spending, an increase in German financing of the EU and a slightly stricter stance taken towards immigration.[48][49] SPD chairperson and Europe expert Martin Schulz was to step down as party leader and join the cabinet as foreign minister,[50] despite having previously stated that he would not serve under a Merkel-led government.[51] However, only days after these reports were published, Schulz renounced his plan to be foreign minister reacting on massive criticism by the party base.[52] The complete text of the coalition agreement was published on 7 February.[53] The coalition deal was subject to approval of the approximately 460,000 members of the SPD in a postal vote.[54][55] The results of the vote were announced on 4 March. In summary, 66% of respondents voted in favour of the deal and 34% voted against it.[56] Approximately 78% of the SPD membership responded to the postal vote.[56] The result allowed the new government to take office immediately following Bundestag approval of Merkel's fourth term on 14 March 2018.[57]
Further reading
edit- Dilling, M. 2018. "Two of the Same Kind? The Rise of the AfD and Its Implications for the CDU/CSU." German Politics and Society 36 (1): 84–104
- Dostal, Jörg Michael. "The German Federal Election of 2017: How the wedge issue of refugees and migration took the shine off Chancellor Merkel and transformed the party system." Political Quarterly 88.4 (2017): 589–602. online
- Faas, Thorsten, and Tristan Klingelhöfer. "The more things change, the more they stay the same? The German federal election of 2017 and its consequences." West European Politics 42.4 (2019): 914–926.
- Franzmann, Simon T., Heiko Giebler, and Thomas Poguntke. "It's no longer the economy, stupid! Issue yield at the 2017 German federal election." West European Politics 43.3 (2020): 610–638. online
- Hansen, Michael A., and Jonathan Olsen. "Flesh of the same flesh: A study of voters for the alternative for Germany (AfD) in the 2017 federal election." German Politics 28.1 (2019): 1–19. online[dead link]
- Olsen, J. 2018. "The Left Party and the AfD. Populist Competitors in Eastern Germany." German Politics and Society 36 (1): 70–83.
- Patton, D. 2017. "Monday, Monday: Eastern Protest Movements and German Party Politics since 1989." German Politics 26 (4): 480–497.
- Schmidt, I. 2017. "PEGIDA: A Hybrid Form of a Populist Right Movement." German Politics and Society 35 (4): 105–117.
Notes
edit- ^ Schulz was formally nominated in March.
- ^ Second votes (party list)
- ^ (formerly part of East Germany)
- ^ (formerly part of East Germany)
- ^ (formerly part of East Germany)
- ^ (formerly part of East Germany)
- ^ (formerly part of East Germany)
References
edit- ^ "Official German election results confirm Merkel's victory". Deutsche Welle. Deutsche Welle. 23 September 2013. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
- ^ "Bundesregierung: Die Große Koalition ist besiegelt" [The grand coalition (deal) is sealed]. Die Zeit (in German). 16 December 2013. ISSN 0044-2070. Archived from the original on 4 August 2016. Retrieved 20 August 2016.
- ^ a b "Art 39 GG – Einzelnorm". Gesetze-im-internet.de. Archived from the original on 9 September 2017. Retrieved 9 September 2017.
- ^ "Bundespräsident Gauck fertigt Anordnung über Bundestagswahl aus". Bundespraesident.de. Archived from the original on 19 September 2017. Retrieved 9 September 2017.
- ^ "Wahlsystem der Bundestagswahl in Deutschland – Wahlrecht und Besonderheiten". Wahlrecht.de . Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
- ^ "Bundestagswahl 2017 – Übersicht: Eingereichte und zugelassene Landeslisten der Parteien". Wahlrecht.de. Archived from the original on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
- ^ "Angela Merkel's Bavarian allies CSU threaten rightward shift". DW. Archived from the original on 10 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ "Deutscher Bundestag - IV. Fraktionen". Deutscher Bundestag. Archived from the original on 9 August 2019. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
- ^ "Ergebnisse Deutschland - der Bundeswahlleiter". Archived from the original on 26 September 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
- ^ a b Officer, The Federal Returning. "Results - The Federal Returning Officer". www.bundeswahlleiter.de. Archived from the original on 4 June 2019. Retrieved 25 September 2017.
- ^ "Deutscher Bundestag - Startseite". Deutscher Bundestag (in German). Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ Braun, Stefan (25 September 2017). "Ein historisches Amt für Wolfgang Schäuble". sueddeutsche.de (in German). ISSN 0174-4917. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
- ^ Müller, Volker. "Deutscher Bundestag - Wolfgang Schäuble mit Abstand dienstältester Abgeordneter". Deutscher Bundestag (in German). Archived from the original on 1 October 2017. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
- ^ "Sitzordnung im Bundestag noch umstritten". n-tv.de (in German). Archived from the original on 8 October 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ Böcking, David; Fischer, Sebastian (27 September 2017). "Künftiger Bundestagspräsident Schäuble: Der Alleskönner". Archived from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2017 – via Spiegel Online.
- ^ "Hans-Peter Friedrich kandidiert zum Bundestags-Vizepräsidenten". inFranken.de (in German). Archived from the original on 17 October 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ "Stichwahl in der Fraktion: AfD will Glaser als Bundestags-Vizepräsident". 27 September 2017. Archived from the original on 1 October 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2017 – via Spiegel Online.
- ^ "Bundestagsvizepräsident: Widerstand gegen AfD-Vorschlag". tagesschau.de (in German). Archived from the original on 13 December 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ "Neuer Bundestag: Die Grünen wollen Roth sehen". tagesschau.de (in German). Archived from the original on 12 December 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ "AfD nominiert Harder-Kühnel als Bundestags-Vize". tagesschau.de. Archived from the original on 7 November 2018. Retrieved 7 November 2018.
- ^ "Deutscher Bundestag - Startseite". Deutscher Bundestag. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
- ^ Germany, Süddeutsche de GmbH, Munich. "Bundestag im zweiten Wahlgang gegen AfD-Abgeordnete". Süddeutsche.de. Archived from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "AfD lawmaker Mariana Harder-Kühnel fails again in vice presidency bid | DW | 04.04.2019". DW.COM. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
- ^ Felten, Uwe (9 April 2019). "Parlament soll Donnerstag abstimmen: Jetzt schickt die AfD Gerold Otten in die Wahl zum Bundestagsvize". RP ONLINE. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
- ^ "Deutschland: AfD scheitert auch mit Kandidat Otten bei Wahl zum Bundestagsvizepräsidenten". 11 April 2019 – via Die Zeit.
- ^ "AfD-Kandidat scheitert bei Wahl zum Vize-Bundestagspräsidenten". NP - Neue Presse. Archived from the original on 1 January 2020. Retrieved 9 June 2019.
- ^ "AfD-Politiker Gerold Otten scheitert auch im dritten Anlauf als Bundestagsvizepräsident". 6 June 2019. Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 9 June 2019 – via www.welt.de.
- ^ Donahue, Patrick; Jennen, Birgit; Delfs, Arne (24 September 2017). "Merkel Humbled as Far-Right Surge Taints Her Fourth-Term Victory". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 24 September 2017. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
- ^ Andreas Rinke (29 August 2017). "Germany's Merkel rules out coalition with far left, far right". reuters.com. Reuters. Archived from the original on 4 October 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2017.
- ^ "Koalition: Merkel lädt ab Mittwoch kommender Woche zu Jamaika-Gesprächen". Spiegel Online. 9 October 2017. Archived from the original on 15 October 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2017.
- ^ Paun, Carmen (7 October 2017). "Angela Merkel Ready to Move Forward with Jamaica Coalition". Politico. Archived from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
- ^ "Endspurt mit strittigen Themen". tagesschau. 15 November 2017. Archived from the original on 11 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2017.
- ^ "FDP bricht Jamaika-Sondierungen ab". tagesschau. 20 November 2017. Retrieved 20 November 2017.
- ^ "German coalition talks: Merkel and Schulz set to meet". DW. Archived from the original on 27 November 2017. Retrieved 27 November 2017.
- ^ Connolly, Kate (24 November 2017). "Germany's SPD is ready for talks to end coalition deadlock". The Guardian. Berlin. Archived from the original on 24 November 2017. Retrieved 24 November 2017.
- ^ Oltermann, Philip (27 November 2017). "German grand coalition talks unlikely to begin until new year". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 27 November 2017. Retrieved 27 November 2017.
- ^ "SPD agrees to open government talks with Merkel after Schulz pleads for green light". The Local Germany. Archived from the original on 8 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ Escritt, Thomas. "German SPD backs talks with Merkel after impassioned Europe speech". Reuters. Archived from the original on 9 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ Connolly, Kate. "Martin Schulz seeks backing for grand coalition to end Germany crisis". Guardian. Archived from the original on 9 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ Charter, David. "Germany's 'grand coalition' could return as Schulz makes U-turn". Times. Archived from the original on 11 December 2017. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ "Germany's SPD to join talks on resolving government impasse". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ Knight, Ben. "German coalition talks reach breakthrough: A look at what comes next". DW. Archived from the original on 19 January 2018. Retrieved 19 January 2018.
- ^ "Germany's Social Democrats vote for formal coalition talks with Angela Merkel". Economist. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Jones, Timothy; Martin, David. "Germany's SPD gives the go-ahead for coalition talks with Angela Merkel's CDU". DW. Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 22 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ "Germany: Angela Merkel's conservatives and SPD open grand coalition talks". DW. DeutscheWelle. Archived from the original on 26 January 2018. Retrieved 27 January 2018.
- ^ Thurau, Jens. "The major sticking points in Germany's upcoming coalition talks". DW. Archived from the original on 23 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Escritt, Thomas (8 February 2018). "Few cheers at home for Germany's last-resort coalition". Reuters. Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ Chazan, Guy. "German conservatives smart at coalition concessions". Financial Times. FT. Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ van der Made, Jan (7 February 2018). "Europe, immigration key to Merkel's coalition deal with Social Democrats". Radio France Internationale. RFI. Archived from the original on 7 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ Cole, Deborah. "Germany's top parties reach deal". Herald Live. Archived from the original on 9 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ "Hero to 'loser': the broken promises of SPD leader Schulz". local.de. 8 February 2018. Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ "German coalition in crisis as Schulz ditches foreign minister plan". Politico Europe. 9 February 2018. Archived from the original on 11 February 2018. Retrieved 11 February 2018.
- ^ "Ein neuer Aufbruch für Europa Eine neue Dynamik für Deutschland Ein neuer Zusammenhalt für unser Land" (PDF). cdu.de. CDU. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2021. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ Knight, Ben. "Germany's Angela Merkel finally reaches coalition deal with SPD". DeutscheWelle. DW. Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ "Germany coalition deal reached after months of wrangling". BBC News. 7 February 2018. Archived from the original on 7 February 2018. Retrieved 8 February 2018.
- ^ a b "Germany's Social Democrats endorse grand coalition". Politico Europe. 4 March 2018. Archived from the original on 4 March 2018. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
- ^ "Bundestag reelects Merkel as chancellor". Politico Europe. 14 March 2018. Archived from the original on 16 March 2018. Retrieved 16 March 2018.