Category talk:4th-century maharajadhirajas

Opposed speedy move request

• Category:4th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:4th-century Maharajadhirajas – "Maharajadhiraja" is consistently capitalised in sources per ngrams. PadFoot (talk) 16:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Category:5th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:5th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:6th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:6th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:7th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:7th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:8th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:8th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:10th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:10th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:11th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:11th-century Maharajadhirajas
  • Category:12th-century maharajadhirajas to Category:12th-century Maharajadhirajas

@PadFoot2008: Your ngram uses the singular version of the term. Wouldn't MOS:JOBTITLES apply in this case? Hey man im josh (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Hey man im josh, plural still shows consistency in use of capitalised [1]. PadFoot (talk) 01:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

That ngram appears to actually not be showing the downcased version, but I'm not understanding why MOS:JOBTITLES wouldn't apply in this situation. It also looks like you created all of the categories yourself, so you must have also thought it should be downcased at one point. Perhaps this nomination would benefit from a CFD instead of a speedy renaming. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

WP:MOS overrides style elsewhere (e.g. evidence from Ngrams). So I think these categories should be left as they are. – Fayenatic London 11:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

I have only tagged these categories now.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)