Category talk:Society

Society vs. Human Societies

I think Category:Society and Category:Human societies should be merged because there is little or no difference between both concepts, as society is almost always human. Therefore, there isn't any reason to have these separated categories. I suggest to have only the category Society and merge Human societies into Society. What's your opinion? --Jaimedv 23:24, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Agree. For the purposes of portals and navigation, that should be fine, though one should prominently note certain animals have society of a sort. dml 14:20, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Disagree. Society is dealing with groups of individuals. So, it should be having human society as a category. For the purposes of portals and navigation, i suggest Category:Social --Arjunkmohan (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Portal

You merged the categories without merging the text from Category:Human societies. Frankly this category text looks far worse than human societies did in terms of formatting. Does someone want to go and reformat the portal part of the category page or undelete the other category to get the text? dml 00:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Categorisation Top 10

Why did you make this category part of the Top 10 category but with an inicial space:

[[Category:Top 10| Society]]

It doesn't look so good to me, mainly because it isn't sorted in the S block but instead, in a no initial block. jοτομικρόν | Talk 13:05, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

circular categories

Society is the subcat and supercat for culture (and, obviously, vice versa). Where within the (useless) higher categories should this (or culture) be situated?

Culture is the valued traditions of the people who compose a society. In the sense used here, "culture" is a subcategory of "society." --129.98.214.103 (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Category

I think this category should not be under the Fundamental Category. Personally, I like order to things, and something being under the Fundamental Category that isn't an "Umbrella" Category shouldn't be there. Additionally, the Category: Social systems (closely related to Scociety) is under the System Category, which is in turn under the Structure and Nature Categories (both "Umbrella" Categories that are under the Fundamental Category). I am bringing this up before I make any changes that would affect the Category system. Esnaz (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

need new a category

I think this category dealing with society. Category:Social has great scope in categorisation to minimise the contents in the category.--Arjunkmohan (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Remove humans category and structure category

Society is a more global category than humans and structure categories so I remove humans and structure categories. It's also for prevent the loops.Zipodu (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)