| Submission declined on 7 June 2024 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 1 December 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk). Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year. Declined by Stuartyeates 10 months ago. | |
The highest power that a cyclist can maintain in a quasi-steady state without fatigue for approximately 1 hour.[1][2]
An important metric and benchmark in cycling used to measure fitness, set power zones, and predict performance.
References
editWhat is Functional Threshold Power https://inscyd.com/article/ftp-limitation/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6835290/ reflist}}
- ^ Borszcz, Fernando Klitzke; Tramontin, Artur Ferreira; Costa, Vitor Pereira (2020-03-01). "Reliability of the Functional Threshold Power in Competitive Cyclists". International Journal of Sports Medicine. 41 (3): 175–181. doi:10.1055/a-1018-1965. ISSN 0172-4622. PMID 31952081.
- ^ Allen, Hunter; PhD, Andrew R. Coggan; PhD, Stephen McGregor (2019-04-17). Training and Racing with a Power Meter: Third Edition (3rd ed.). VeloPress. ISBN 978-1-937715-93-9.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.