Submission declined on 21 May 2024 by Kline (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 20 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 19 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 4 April 2024 by Taking Out The Trash (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Taking Out The Trash 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 13 March 2024 by Timothytyy (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Timothytyy 7 months ago.
|
- Comment: Okay, one source is better than none, but still not enough. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Still completely unreferenced, hence also no evidence of notability. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Resubmitted without improvement. Do that again and the draft will be rejected. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Gurudwara Sri Data Bandi Chhor Sahib | |
---|---|
Religion | |
Affiliation | Sikhism |
Festival | Bandi Chhor Divas |
Location | |
Location | Gwalior Fort, Gwalior |
State | Madhya Pradesh |
Country | India |
Geographic coordinates | 26°13′13″N 78°10′02″E / 26.2203053°N 78.167129°E |
Architecture | |
Founder | Baba Amar Singh |
Completed | 1968 |
Gurdwara Sri Data Bandi Chhor Sahib is the gurdwara (house of worship for Sikhs) in Gwalior city in Madhya Pradesh, India. This Gurdwara is associated with the imprisonment of Guru Har Gobind Sahib in Gwalior Fort[1]
Nomenclature
editAccording to Sikh tradition, the 52 kings imprisoned as hostages in the fort for opposing the Mughal Empire were disheartened because they were losing a spiritual guru.[2] Guru Hargobind Ji refused to be released unless the other prisoners were also released. Jahangir ordered that only those kings who could hold the Guru's Chola could be released. Guru Hargobind had a special chola stitched. As soon as Guru Hargobind left the fort, the captive kings caught hold of Guru Hargobind Ji and came out with him. This earned the Guru the title of Data Bandi Chhor and that's why Gurdwara names Gurdwara Data Bandi Chhor[3]
Gallery
editReferences
edit- ^ "Gurudwara Data Bandi Chhod, Gwalior (2024) - Images, Timings | Holidify".
- ^ "Gurdwara Sri Data Bandi Chor Sahib | Discover Sikhism". www.discoversikhism.com.
- ^ "HistoricalGurudwaras.com, a Journey to Historical Gurudwara Sahibs". www.historicalgurudwaras.com.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.