| Submission rejected on 19 September 2023 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by CNMall41 14 months ago. Last edited by LarsHolmberg 5 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 8 September 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk).Stuartyeates 14 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 July 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Stuartyeates 16 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 15 June 2023 by LittlePuppers (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by LittlePuppers 17 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 2 June 2023 by Greenman (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Greenman 17 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 1 June 2023 by Mcmatter (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Mcmatter 17 months ago.
| |
Comment: This is the 6th submission of this draft and was done so WITHOUT any improvements. CNMall41 (talk) 20:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: More third party sources are needed Stuartyeates (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources 1-2, 4-5 are not independent; 6 is a blog; 3 and 7 are not significant coverage. LittlePuppers (talk) 18:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources need to be independent to help establish notability. Greenman (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
| Original author(s) | Jonatan Heyman |
|---|---|
| Developer(s) | Contributors to the Locust project |
| Initial release | 2011 |
| Stable release | 2.28.0
/ May 26, 2024 |
| Repository | github |
| Type | Load testing |
| License | MIT License[1] |
| Website | locust |
Locust is an open source load testing and web server benchmarking tool.[2] It is written in Python and was originally created by Jonatan Heyman[3] in 2011.[4]
Tests can be executed in a single process or in a scalable way on multiple machines.[5] It can test HTTP based services[6], but can also be extended to test most other protocols, including for example XML-RPC and gRPC.[7][8]
Unlike many other load testing tools, test scenarios are expressed imperatively in regular code, not created in a UI or expressed as configuration.[9][10]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "Changelog Highlights". locust.io. Retrieved 2023-06-02.
- ^ Shrivastava, Siddhant; Prapulla (2020-05-01). "Comprehensive Review of Load Testing Tools" (PDF). 07 (5). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology: 3393. ISSN 2395-0056. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ "What is Locust?". locust.io. Retrieved 2023-06-02.
- ^ "Pypi history for old package". pypi.org. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- ^ "Running locust distributed". Locust. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- ^ Camilli, Matteo; Janes, Andrea; Russo, Barbara (2022-05-01). "Automated test-based learning and verification of performance models for microservices systems". Journal of Systems and Software. 187: 111225. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.111225. ISSN 0164-1212. S2CID 246300964. Retrieved 2023-06-20.
- ^ "Testing other systems/protocols". Locust. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- ^ Shrivastava, Siddhant; Prapulla (2020-05-01). "Comprehensive Review of Load Testing Tools" (PDF). 07 (5). International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology: 3393. ISSN 2395-0056. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ "JMeter vs. Locust: What to Use When". dzone.com. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- ^ "What is locust?". Locust. Retrieved 2023-08-30.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.