CNMall41

Request for more specific feedback on Draft: Kagi (payment provider)

Hey CNMall41, Thanks for taking the time to review my article submission. I saw the feedback boxes you gave me about WP: NCORP and WP: ADMASQ. I just wanted to quickly ask for a few more specifics, so I can improve the article and make sure it meets Wikipedia’s standards.

I based much of the article on two main sources, MacRumors and TidBITS, which I understood to be respected, independent outlets that align with Wikipedia’s definition of good sources. Both articles were in-depth pieces specifically about the company's bankruptcy and history. Both are secondary sources with no link to the founders (as far as I can tell, please do let me know if I'm missing something).

Both sources have established themselves as reliable and trustworthy on Wikipedia.

However, I’m open to the possibility that I may have missed something or misinterpreted how these sources are evaluated. As well, would it be possible for you to provide a bit more specific feedback on which parts of the article seemed to sound like an advertisement and whether certain sources were problematic?

I’m genuinely aiming to make the article neutral and properly referenced, and any additional guidance would be greatly appreciated.

I've been having trouble trying to find a reliable compendium of facts on what this company actually offered, all on one page, hence the kinda... sporadic sourcing in the services section.

I completely understand that your time is valuable, and I don’t want to impose or demand a response. I would just like to ensure that I’m improving the submission in the most effective way possible.

Thanks again for your time and consideration. Titfortat-skag (talk) 19:31, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Those sources are considered reliable for a WikiProject, not for notability. We based things on WP:NCORP and you can find a list of reliable sources at WP:RSP which should assist you. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Stuart Kinder

Would you be able to help with this draft that was not approved? FloridaArmy (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

This is a tough one depending on how you read WP:NFILMMAKER. If you read "is notable" (meaning it just needs to verify they were one of the roles listed, then he is likely notable. I can find sources verifying but always like to see something that talks more about him in-depth. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your are spam

Zee tamil edit you have changed iis correct information and reference with source of popular articles and you are deleted I have no problem you will get serious problem I will report and information are deleted Zee telugu old serial name also deleted why it is also referred from channel past one week In zee keralam Madhura Nombara Kaatu is official remake of na kodhalu Bangaram serial not remake of peranbu I have referred all and you are deleted I will report Be ready for every thing Arun GKA (talk) 06:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) I would consider this to be some kind of threat, except that it is barely intelligible. BD2412 T 12:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412:, if you look here you can see that user is definitely WP:NOTHERE. Is there enough for a block or would you recommend ANI? --CNMall41 (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I just went ARV as they continue to disruptively edit pages. I'm doing a mass revert now. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I think there is a WP:COMPETENCE issue here as well. BD2412 T 21:06, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

And a possible SPI issue. I have connected at least two accounts but gathering more before filing for CU. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:08, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

The editor has been blocked for two weeks. If they're sockpuppeting, I would expect them to move to another new account and continue this behavior. BD2412 T 21:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Stacii Jae Johnson

Hello, CNMall41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stacii Jae Johnson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Powers Picture Plays

Would you be able to help with this declined draft? FloridaArmy (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

@FloridaArmy:, Do you have access to Newspapers.com by chance? I will take a look now but that site has always helped with drafts and pages such as these. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Disagreements!

Ha! I don't know about you but I would much rather disagree with an experienced respected editor than having to battle a UPE/sock (or a hoard of them). S0091 (talk) 19:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Of course. I never mind disagreeing. Its Wikipedia. Seems to be an issue for some at the moment (not you) who want to assist UPE and argue for the sake of arguing. Puzzling but it is what it is. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I think it's more arguing for the sake of it rather than assisting UPE, though that might be the effect. Some editors could care less about UPE (including AfC/NPP reviewers), which I get if the article meets N or at least close-ish (enough for a valid argument) but, like you, that's not what I seeing with some these AfDs and worse to me not engaging in discussion which is the purpose of an AfD (i.e. this is my opinion and I am not going to address any questions/explain how sources meet the guidelines so disengaging but let me bold/ all caps things on my way out). If you are not willing/able to engage and think you need to bold/caps things then you are not doing a good job explaining your position, in my view. S0091 (talk) 20:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

I believe you hit the nail on the head ("arguing for the sake of it rather than assisting UPE). Pushing aside UPE concerns for the sake of "need to be right" is how I would put it. The "assisting" is just a byproduct of it I guess. I get the bold and not discussing as well. Frustrating, especially when a closer will sometimes look at number of keep or delete votes from experienced editors and not always at the rationale behind those votes. I have been seeing a lot of keep or delete votes that I ask for clarification on with no response. And for the record, I think you and I agree on the validity of the sources for this page in particular. I believe the disagreement is coming with how much weight they have towards notability which is always a good discussion to have. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, CNMall41. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.W170924 (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Left a message on your talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Mor Chhainha Bhuinya 2

hi CNMall41 (talk) as i said earlier i checked

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#Guidelines_on_sources i can confirm once again that 'News18 India by Network18 Group' has a 'green tick' meaning its legit and once again 'times of india' is marked 'no conconsensus', Bonadart (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

@Bonadart:, frankly, I am a little tired of explaining it as I have several times in the AfD, on the talk page, and in the edit summaries. See WP:NEWSORGINDIA. A green tick means the publication itself is reliable, but NOT ALL THE CONTENT from that publication. Restore again and I will need to take it to ANI. Seems to be a WP:CIR issue at this point and is getting ad nauseam. Get consensus or stop. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

hi i get ypur point but try to understand my point, when it now known the source is reliable, NOT ALL THE CONTENT can be reliable is a fact too, everyone makes mistakes even rueters or bbc make mistake which is they run disclaimer on veracity of content. i rest my point Bonadart (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Again, WP:CIR. It is not my "point." It is part of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. As stated on your talk page, these conversations also need to stay in their perspective places. The fact you replied here shows again that you are having issues grasping working in a collaborative environment. Please keep the discussion in one place as stated on your talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Aoceall/sandbox

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Aoceall/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Not mine. Was actually an AfC move to Draft:Adam Ó Ceallaigh. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Angela Bonavoglia

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angela Bonavoglia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Published Angela Bonavoglia

Hi, CNMall41! Thank you for creating a draft article for Angela Bonavoglia! I came across the article after you nominated it for deletion because you couldn't find enough sources to established notability. Generally, per Wikipedia's notability guidelines for authors, if an author has had at least two books reviewed in reliable sources, the author themself is considered notable. Because I was able to find book reviews for Bonavoglia's other book, I went ahead published the article. If you would still prefer to blank and redirect to the book, however, I would completely understand. :) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade:, No complaints here. I will let it be. I actually created the original in userspace and was attempting to find significant coverage to make it live. I couldn't so sent it to draft six months ago so others could improve if they wished and you can see the notice above was for it to get deleted as an abandoned draft (which is why I just requested the deletion). We may disagree about WP:NAUTHOR as I am shy about calling something "significant" under that guideline just because it has a Wikipedia page. That was also why I held off on publishing it because there wasn't really anything to make an article more than a stub. Hopefully she will have more press in the future to be able to build upon the page (I even scavenged what I could from Newspapers.com). Either way, like I said, no complaints. Cheers!!--CNMall41 (talk) 01:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

WP:NEWSORGINDIA

Heya. I concur with your view on eliminating the use of paid-news reporting that's rampant in the Indian media. However, WP:NEWSORGINDIA should not be used as a blanket reasoning to tag/delete articles that uses sources such TOI, HIndustan Times, India Today, etc. If such sources are being used for problematic inclusions, such as puffing up or putting down a film or actor, then I'd agree with such tags, but if they are being used to mention neutral information, such as a release date or an actor's casting, then there shouldn't be a problem. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 10:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. These sources also contain things such as budget, gross, and fluff which are being supplied by those with an interest in the film. As such, I don't see any information from them as being reliable (it is basically what THEY want you to know about the film and not what a reliable secondary source says about it). I try to find replacements for some but if the majority of the sources are paid, I tag and allow others more familiar with the film to replace them. I find this better than stripping them or removing content if I cannot find a suitable source. I believe the WP:ONUS for using these sources is on the person who presents them and I only tag a select few relative to the number that are out there. As far as notability, if a draft is only supported by them, I normally send to draft as an WP:ATD. If I look and cannot find sources that show notability, then AfD (sometimes redirect but IPs and SPAs with COIs are always removing them - likely so they can get paid). Hopefully that explains my reasoning but happy to discuss further. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:, on a side note, I just saw the revert made at List of films released by Yash Raj Films. This would also fall under ONUS in my opinion but sounds like there is a technical issue possibly on my end so I won't revert (thanks for leaving that in the edit summary otherwise I would have thought otherwise). Can you take a quick look on mobile and see if there are issues? I see all of the images and have to scroll before I get to the actually filmography. I will check on laptop later as it is likely due to the resolution of my desktop. On a side note of this side note lol, if you check the edit history, you will see what I try to do for replacement of NEWSORGINDIA as I think there were about 10 sources that I replaced on the page at the same time I removed the images. I think blanket tagging is lazy so I try to avoid it when I can. Thanks and cheers!!--CNMall41 (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Oh yes, I should absolutely thank you for the ref changes on the Yash Raj Film listicle, and I apologise for not saying that earlier in my message. I think, yes, on mobile, the images aren't adjoining to the table, but they are perfectly placed on desktop. That's a technical restriction ig due to screen size, and I'm not sure if we cater to one over the other.

As for the NEWSORGINDIA sources, I always revert info such as budget or gross if they are from such sources, but I still feel that neutral info such as release dates, filming locations, song names and credits, should be used without problem. We just have to be more careful about what is and isn't paid journalism, and that is a contentious issue without a clear-cut answer. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:, no thanks necessary. I just wanted to make sure you knew I'm not just out there bludgeoning pages, which a few have made veiled accusations of prejudice against me simply for me focusing on spam and UPE coming out of a specific region. I would actually like to focus on improving a lot of the pages but keeping up with the UPE and spam has been a chore in itself. Starting to make a little headway which allows me to do more of what I was doing with Yash Raj Films.

As far as referencing, I think we are on the same page (or at least in the same chapter). I just put it on the editor who introduces the reference to show how it is reliable as more times that not, it is not. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I should note that if anyone questions if the NEWSORGINDIA sources are paid for not, simply go to Upwork or Fiverr, create and account, and do a search for some of the publications. It is so simple to get anything printed with these pubs. Or, just contact one of these firms and they will do it for you. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

I just checked images on my laptop and they show as you stated (just fine). Checking on my desktop they bleed until the bottom of the references list. Checking cell phone, they take up all the space at the beginning and you have to scroll to the end to see the list of films. You are correct there is no standard for what we use based on devices. Very confusing for some however depending on where they are viewing from. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Yea, understandable. Btw, on a note related to our previous discussion on sourcing, could you check out the edits made by Bonadart on the film Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3. Not only are they prone to using poor sources and tabloid-y lingo, they are also quick to edit-war when reverted. I've taken the liberty of adding tags to individual sections. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

hi Krimuk2.0 (talk)

AFAIK it was you yourself who had first added co- in front of written and directed, implying anees bazmee as co-writer. i just added source as such to substantiate it. I just gave credit to Akash Kaushik as co-writer. how is it problematic i dont know. Bonadart (talk) 08:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:, I will take a look now. @Bonadart:, you are a hair away from WP:ANI. You have already ventured into WP:TE territory as your WP:NOTGETTINGIT is becoming disruptive to other's enjoyment of editing Wikipdia. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Looking at the "Development" section, the wording is all WP:OR. An example is that neither reference (one of which is unreliable under NEWSORGINDIA) says nothing about a T-Series release or when the official announcement was. There is a caption on a pic that shows T-Series owns that pic copyright, but nothing about them releasing. The other source says that T-Series has agreed to do part 5 (two films from now assuming that actually goes into product - maybe 2026???), but not part 3. I wouldn't waste time going through the rest. This one would be suitable to be sent back to draft space until someone can ensure accuracy. Bonadart, I would recommend you doing so and then sending through AfC. If not, I would be more than happy to do so. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

They have restored the same tabloid-y lingo and MoS issues to that article soon after I corrected them. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:, given the edit history over the last 24 hours from newly created accounts and the failure of the creator to respond (despite being swift to respond to their own inquiries), I moved to draft. The WP:FAKEREFerences are still present and it raises eyebrows about newly created accounts who go direct to this page to edit. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Had to move it to Draft:Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 2 as Draft:Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3 already exists from earlier this year. Note that the IPs who edited both are in the same range so filing an WP:SPI now. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

hi CNMall41 (talk) i dont know what was your confusion about was it is being produced then here is the proof that says T-Aseries has produced the film and it is being released by AA films (as part of 3 film deal) and when it was officially announced

1. https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/bhool-bhulaiyaa-3-teaser-vidya-balan-as-manjulika-returns-angrier-than-ever-kartik-aaryan-romances-triptii-dimri-101727421546033.html

2. https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/exclusives/exclusive-buzz-devara-bhool-bhulaiyaa-3-and-pushpa-2-single-screens-booking-begin-1328231

3. https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/rooh-baba-returns-kartik-aaryan-announces-bhool-bhulaiyaa-3-with-spooky-video-watch-2341318-2023-03-01

its all present in the page itself yet you say you need clarity, what more clarity i can give?

i hope you get it back on main space ASAP after this reply btw as for cleanup I have always tried to keep the page proper any wrong or unsubstaited additions were trimmed. I don't like wholesale removal always. wikipedia is for information lets keep it at that.

Bonadart (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to reply despite continue to edit the page prior. Excuse my brash response but this is getting tiring at this point. What confusion is there? You tell me the confusion as it still seems to be a WP:CIR issue. If you would like, I can go to the draft and strip what needs stripping but I do not want to be accused of bludgeoning so will leave for others to address. At this point I cannot assist you as it has pretty much drained my enjoyment of editing Wikipedia. The references you used on the actual page do NOT support the statement. If the references above do, then those should have been used. Do as you will but understand if you continue to edit in the manner you are it will need addressed by the community. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

As i said the references are already on the page and links were uploaded and content created by me Bonadart (talk) 20:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Please reply inline as opposed to this as it gets confusing for anyone following the thread. Wikipedia is based on sourcing, it is not a repository of information that we want it to say. At this point, there is no need for you to comment on my talk page further. Any conduct issues should be continued on the original thread on your talk page (where it was also previously stated to have these discussions but you have ignored). --CNMall41 (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi once again i will say everything here is coroborated with sources, any weak sources have been supported and added with better sources, that is all i can say. thanksBonadart (talk) 20:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Once again, I will say there is no need for you to reply here. We can keep conduct on your talk page and you can discuss the referencing on the draft talk page. Let me be clear. Do NOT leave another message on my talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:, creator moved back to mainspace without addressing the issues. I started to but since I filed an SPI, I will not edit further as I don't want it to seem as bludgeoning. Will wait for SPI results and would recommend ANI if it persists. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

It's impossibly difficult maintaining the quality of these pages, especially with little admin support. I don't think deleting or moving pages to drafts is the answer though. Our main purpose is to serve our readers, a lot of whom will visit pages of such an anticipated upcoming film. But we definitely need stronger protection from admins to do so. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

We do need more support, mainly from SPI, but they are stretched thin so I understand they don't have the time. I think more support from other editors would be helpful. Like I said above, there are some who seem to want to undo all of the edits of G5's and other things that have been done to discourage UPE and COI which in the end only serves as a service to the agencies paying. I don't think we do a service to our readers by allowing that work to continue. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:38, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Glad to see you again

Hello! It's great to see you again after a long time. I'm back temporarily and wanted to discuss the possibility of bringing back article on Jishnu Raghavan. I noticed that the sockpuppeting issue persists, but setting that aside, Jishnu was a notable Malayalam film actor who clearly meets our notability criteria. Could you guide me on the proper procedure to restore the article? Thilsebatti (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I'll pass. Forgive my cynicism, but you came back around the same period this was G5'd (a few days ago) after being recreated yet again (around 10 times in the last year now) but under another alternative name. Leaving the link here to the SPI and name variations for talk page watchers. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

From January to September, my contributions totaled less than 150 edits due to eight months of hectic travel. But before that for a period of 16 months, I have made a total of 14000 edits with more than 200 articles created as well. Now that I have some spare time for a few weeks, I wanted to work on a notable topic. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but these UPEs and SOCKs have wasted so much time of editors such as myself and taken away from the enjoyment of editing that I am NOT willing to assist. I will continue to watch the targets and ensure the integrity of Wikipedia whether that be from SOCKS, UPEs, NPOV, Referencing and any other guidelines that would apply to its recreation. It is also disheartening that you are willing to assist them in the name of what you feel is a "notable topic." Hours of my enjoyment stripped away from myself along with admins and other editors of English Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and numerous other language Wikipedias. Not trying to be insulting, but I mean this in the most disrespectful way when I say I appreciate it.--CNMall41 (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm only disappointed when you said It is also disheartening that you are willing to assist them in the name of what you feel is a "notable topic. I'm in no way assisting these sockfarms. My only purpose is to serve readers. The actor was a well known figure in my state and he easily passes our notability guidelines. This kind of reaction from an experienced editor from you is very disheartening for me as well. After all I was only trying to improve the site. But you are taking into a different direction. Thilsebatti (talk) 16:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

If you take into account that experienced editors myself are frustrated and will likely leave Wikipedia if this type of conduct continues, you will no longer be able to serve the readers. And yes, they are being assisted. Not directly, but they receive a direct benefit from the slap in the face this gives other editors. Not taking anything in a different direction. You started the ball down the road. The canvassing of other editors is not good either. Final note, be aware of WP:NEWSORGINDIA which I left a note about on the decline of the draft. No need to come back here as I cannot do anything else for you. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

One final message and I'm leaving. I have done no canvassing and don't accuse someone without any reason. Now I will leave from this talk page. Thanks Thilsebatti (talk) 17:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

I would also recommend NOT canvassing, but do as you will. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Can you please point me one instance where I did canvassing? Thilsebatti (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Sure, I will give you one, two, three. As far as the first link, if you have an issue with my conduct, I would suggest taking it to ANI as opposed to complaining to one of the editors you are looking for support from. ALSO - Despite the message on the draft and pointing it out here, you continue to add WP:NEWSORGINDIA to the draft. I can't even at this point......--CNMall41 (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Canvassing refers to notification done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way, and is considered inappropriate. I just asked DreamRimmer whether they know some admins who does AFC reviewing. I just asked Tavantius why they declined the draft. If these two seems canvassing for you, I have no words. I wanted to stop previously. I hope this can be my last message here. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

To clarify, this will be your last message here. You were told there is no need to comment here. If you have an issue with the draft, use that talk page. If you have an issue with my conduct, go to ANI. Replying here is, again, taking the fun out of editing Wikipedia as I have to continue to reply about a subject that has already drained quite a few editors. Do as you will, but do not do it here. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Index draft

Hi user:CNMall41, this is Kelsey from Index Ventures, where we've gone back and forth about the draft you put together for the article here: Talk:Index_Ventures#Partners_section_edit_request. Sorry to bother you, but I just wanted to ask if you had the time to implement your draft into the article. Thank you again for all the attention you've given to the article; it is extremely appreciated! Kelsey at Index (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Kelsey at Index:, the edits were just implemented. I also removed the COI tag from the top and appreciate you following the process. I would suggest closing out the current requests you have and then using whatever remained from those requests which was NOT implemented and start a new request. That way editors are not confused with what still needs implemented. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)