Significa liberdade

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Significa liberdade! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:55, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

RfA nomination?

Hey there, Significa liberdade! Clovermoss and I have been working together to find users who would make great candidates at RfA and great admins – I was a little surprised to see your name on the list, because I thought you were an admin already! I've seen your name around a bunch, with only positive impressions. You have a great content record, do lots of work in admin-like spaces, and seeing the way you handled this thread on your talk only convinced me more. If you're interested in becoming an admin, let me know! We can talk more here, or you can find me on email or Discord (same username). thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Theleekycauldron (and Clovermoss)! Thank you for the kind words! I mainly haven't considered RfA because I'm not sure how I would use any of the additional privileges given my current strengths, background, interests, etc. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

You might find my approach to this in my RfA interesting because I also didn't have a strong "need" for the tools. I genuinely believe that a few more people pitching in where they can is good but I also understand completely if the RfA process itself makes you hesitant. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Seconded – we could always use more admins who are willing to help out wherever they can. If you're looking for a place to get comfortable with the tools, I think you could put your experience at CSD and AfD to good use dealing with other people's nominations :) from there, you can branch out! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amazing Rain (novel).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amazing Rain (novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you so much for your work in significantly expanding Wilfred Beckerman. I really appreciate it! Whoareuagain (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphan article Zion Richardson

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link at List of people from Indianapolis, Athletes section. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 02:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @JoeNMLC! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

NPOV

I fail to see how an article about the family of three Japanese Prime Ministers is not notable per WP:NPOV. There are articles about notable political families such as the Kennedy family or Udall family. The article does need expansion, not removal. --Plumber (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Plumber! Thanks for reaching out with your concern. The article for the Satō–Kishi–Abe family has not been removed from Wikipedia; rather, it have been moved into the draft space, where you and others can continue working on it. It was moved to the draft space because it only used a single source. If you look at the other articles you mentioned (i.e., about the Kennedys and the Udalls), you'll notice that they have many sources to highlight the families' notability. As an autoconfirmed user, you may move the Satō–Kishi–Abe family article back into the main space if you object to the draftification, though I would suggest adding at least 1-2 more sources before doing so. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification, I was not fully aware of how the draft space worked. --Plumber (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for all of your help and great edits, on the Lauren Chen article. You are greatly appreciated! PaulPachad (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, PaulPachad! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Tim Bowden

I see you have "Books: removed primary refs" from the article on Tim Bowden. It would be helpful if you point me to the guideline that specifies this should be the case. Oronsay (talk) 01:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Oronsay! Thanks for reaching out with your question. For the Tim Bowden article, I removed the references in the book section and replaced the name of the book with {{citation}}/{{cite book}}. As such, the full reference for each book is there, but it doesn't show up as an in-text citation. I don't know if there is a specific policy about this, but it is common practice for articles relating to authors. Feel free to revert if you find policy or think it's better off the other way. =) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt reply. On reflection, it looks better now. Oronsay (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

The ISBN format can be very difficult to access info compared to Trove entries where internally the trove link has much more reader friendly information: an exmaple might be McCrae, Hugh; McCrae, Hugh, 1876-1958. Poems. Selections (1911), Satyrs and sunlight (Second ed.), Thomas C. Lothian, retrieved 8 September 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) the url to the trove work id is identified - the book is a long time before ISBNs - the Tim items have no url included only ISBN. I am adding this as FYI and have no intention to edit the item further at this stage, I am not 100% sure that Trove entry ISBN is a default option compared to the pre-ISBN items. Apologies to the intrusion on this subject. JarrahTree 12:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your input, JarrahTree! We can certainly add the Trove link to the bibliography reference. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

very kind of you to respond that way - I thought I was having a true senior moment - maybe my lack of getting a hang of ISBN stuff, then was having trouble of properly identfiying the correct work/xxxx number was causing further stress about the issue... sigh... JarrahTree 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deborah Lutz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Foundation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Shafeev Award and Fojtik Henglein Award

I saw that you had declined and requested revdel on Draft:Shafeev Award, which was created by the author of Draft:Fojtik Henglein Prize, an article that has most certainly the same issues that I foolishly accepted a day or two again. Appreciate if you could take a look at it quickly and see if there's anything else I missed since it's very similar. Thank you, Reconrabbit 23:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Reconrabbit! I haven't been able to check for similarities through Earwig while it's searching the internet. However, checking against the cited sources doesn't seem to bring anything up, and neither does a more general Google search. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

I know how stressful it can be to receive thoughtful and critical opposes. I know you'll take their feedback into consideration, as you have before and I admire your resilience, and no matter the outcome of the RfA, hope you take care of yourself and continue to be a net positive to the community. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 11:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

🥰 thank you so much, Shushugah! I’m already reflecting on and implementing feedback. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator

Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hang in there

As someone who's RfA was pretty contentious, I know that this is stressful. But the stress will pass, and I think you will too. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @Ad Orientem! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I came here to say the same thing. The RFA is still ten points outside of the discretionary zone. I think most people opposing seem to tacitly accept that you are going to pass, and they want to make sure you've heard the concerns that have been expressed, which is fair enough. I got beat up on about the nuances of speeedy deletion as well, I tried to make the point, which I believe you have touched on as well, that there is a world of difference between nominating somethibg for CSD and actually just deleting it yourself. You got this. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Just Step Sideways! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I know I used it as "dear admin, please look at this, is it bad?" at least a couple of times before someone kindly told me not to bother admins about drafts that will just time out anyway... -- asilvering (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade, I admire your patience and it will pay off in the next ten hours. I won't say anything now till that time since Asilvering is already here, indirectly, to drop the baton. Congrats in advance. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

adele bloch-bauer 1 revertion

hi, i can see why those categories were reverted, but just so you know why i put them there - the painting was featured in the movie 'woman in gold' with helen mirren so i put them there because of the fact the movie centers around that whole story and painting - but perhaps that is stretching it. sometimes i don't know if categories are being stretched unreasonably, i didn't view it that way but i can see why you did. let me know your thoughts so i can learn from it thx Gregorcollins (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Gregorcollins! Thank you for reaching out with your question. Looking at the Adele Bloch-Bauer article, it appears that Cmr08 deleted several categories specifically related to the film. I understand that it can sometimes be confusing to know the boundaries of how to categorize something. Categories are specifically used for people trying to find similar information. For example, if I wanted to learn about American presidents, I could go to the category Presidents of the United States. It would probably be confusing if, in that list, I saw Bill Burr and Dennis Quaid alongside George Washington and Barack Obama, even though Burr and Quaid have played presidents in films. Similarly, if someone is interested in films scored by Hans Zimmer, they would likely be confused if they saw Adele Bloch-Bauer. I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have further questions. :) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

i gotcha. thank you for the very clear explanation! Gregorcollins (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome, Gregorcollins! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

I haven't been online since yesterday, so I only got this notice now. I'm sorry if I caused any problems, but as far as I knew those categories were not ones that the article about a person should be in. I should have left more than an edit summary. I was actually just about to remove the categories that didn't belong from Issa Ibrahim that same editor added, but I'll leave a talk page message instead. Cmr08 (talk) 02:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations in advance!

Though I am in the opposition, the result of the RfA is clear enough, with but a few hours left (and I strongly doubt I can jinx it), and I extend my congratulations in advance on getting the mop. I'll admit that I'm still uncomfortable with some of your draftifications and AfDs, but I hope you'll take the advice there on board and be a great sysop. And I'm sorry if my opposition caused you discomfort, or came across as too negative or brusque: I know that negative comments at a stressful forum like RfA can go down badly with the candidates. As such, your friendly and respectful demeanor, especially with the opposers, amidst all the stress of the RfA, impressed me greatly. All in all, I wish you the best in your future work as an editor as well as a sysop. I expect you'll do well enough too. JavaHurricane 16:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, JavaHurricane! I really appreciate it, and I am certainly reflecting on the feedback received to help become a better editor and (fingers-crossed that the sky doesn't fall) a good admin. Please don't be afraid to point out areas of concern in the future. =) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Similar to JavaHurricane, congrats from an oppose voter! The consensus was clear trust in your willingness to keep learning as an already excellent editor, so I wish you luck in continued productive and enjoyable work here🥳! Your hard work on literature articles is sincerely appreciated! BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 02:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, BluePenguin18! I appreciate it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Your new garb! Hope this fits.

I couldn't close this one for obvious reasons, but I thought I'd extend my congratulations, deliver your T shirt and welcome you to the admin cadre. You handled yourself well in the last week. Take care, and when you get bored of scrabbling down the back of the sofa to find the right block message, have a look in my Monobook. Some kind soul put some code there that produces a nifty dropdown menu. ϢereSpielChequers 21:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Aw man, you beat me to the t-shirt. And we're all out of flamethrowers at the moment. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Congrats!

Do good stuff with the mop. Cheers Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 22:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

You did it. Welcome to the NIONTDRBSCC (not in or near the discretionary range but still controversial club)! (We are working on the name.) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

lol, thanks, HouseBlaster. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

A baton for you!

	The new admin baton
	When I said I was pumped to hand over this WP:BATON, I meant it. Welcome to the janitorial cabal. This bin is all yours now. Congratulations on your successful RfA, Significa liberdade! May your mopping be as successful as the RfA. asilvering (talk) 22:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA successful

Congratulations Significa liberdade! Your RfA was successful. You are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I hope you have just as happy a time editing in the future as you did before your RfA. You may want to look at the admin guide to read up on any tools you are unfamiliar with. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Felicitations. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Primefac! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Oof, you must be glad that's over. Take a breath. Ask lots of questions, especially when you're in doubt. WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT are really really important. Thanks for stepping up to serve your community in what is often a thankless and unseen job. Mkdw ^talk 23:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Congrats on your successful RfA. I know you will keep on doing what you do best (but now with some extra buttons).Have a nice time on-and-off-wiki...🎊 Volten001 ^☎ 03:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Sending parabéns :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Obrigada, Vanderwaalforces! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations! Welcome to the corps. —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, Significa liberdade. Although I opposed, your responses to editors' concerns assure me that you will use them to become a better editor, and I look forward to seeing the good you'll do as an administrator. 😎👍 Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

• Congrats, was glad to be able to support you. I hope some of the unfair criticism about new page patrolling won't deter your excellent work there. AusLondonder (talk) 06:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

• Hello, Significa liberdade,

I just saw that you deleted an article I tagged which made me realize that you are an admin now! Congratulations! If you have questions, do not hesitate asking a fellow admin for advice. We are here to help. There are an awful lot of scripts and editing tools that exist to make the job easier, I encourage you to look at our js pages and copy any that appear to be useful or go to Wikipedia:User scripts/List and browse through the list. Good luck! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, Liz!! I'll make sure to go through those pages. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawa model

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kawa model you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 06:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congrats and thanks

Thanks for answering my question in your RfA. I apologize that I did not see the answer in time to make a !vote, but I trust that your new admin tools will be used well. Congrats! Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 07:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @The ed17! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

2023–24 Liga V moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 Liga V. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

About your comments on my talk page

What did you mean by “provides evidence to the contrary”, and how could I improve my mentorship responses? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, AirshipJungleman29: Thanks for asking! Based on my reading, some of your responses on your talk page come across passive aggressive, such as your response to an arbitration notification. Although you may have disagreed with this case being brought to arbitration--found it silly even!--you can respond to the situation in a more civil manner.

As for the mentorship responses, I find them to be quite curt, and at times, can read as though you are annoyed. For example, when Luyabd asked about how to create an article, you responded, "The links on your talk page might be helpful." This is true; the links are available on their talk page. However, such a response can come off as rude, especially because tone of voice, gestures, etc. aren't available via text. When working with newbies, it's important to make the Wikipedia environment seem as friendly and inviting as possible. During mentorship, this can mean encouraging them to ask questions. I also find it valuable to have a response answer the question more directly so the user doesn't click around and go somewhere else to find a quick answer to their question.

I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Hmm. I can see the mentorship thing and will work on that, but I would have thought WP:PACT would apply to an editor using LLMs to deny AI generation. If those are the standards required it's definitely a good thing this is going the way it is. Anyway, thanks very much for your honesty and quick response, and I'll see you around. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

AirshipJungleman29: To my understanding, PACT indicates that there are times when it's understandable to not AGF. There are many ways to respond to incredulous behaviour from other editors, including not responding. In a situation like the one mentioned, people in arbitration may clearly see the other editor as in the wrong without you ever having to say a word. However, your response to others reflects on you. As an admin, it's expected that people will get upset with you for many reasonable behaviours, such as deleting their copy-paste article. It's also often expected that you will de-escalate the situation (unless a block is required, in which case don't feed the trolls). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

That's probably true yeah, thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Congratulations

Hi, congrats on becoming an admin! Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 17:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Alextejthompson! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)