Submission declined on 24 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Curb Safe Charmer 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by Ae245 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Ae245 5 months ago. | |
Comment: With the possible exception of the Today article from 10+ years ago, none of the sources cited contribute towards notability per WP:NCORP, and it alone isn't enough.There is also no indication of any real noteworthiness, ie. a reason why this company should be included in a global encyclopaedia. Merely existing isn't a reason. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This article contains paid contributions. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. |
RSM Stone Forest.[1] [2](formerly Stone Forest) is a group of companies within RSM Singapore. Founded in 1985 by Chio Kian Huat[3]it is the sixth largest[4] professional services network globally by revenue.[5][6][7][8]
References
edit- ^ "RSM CORPORATE ADVISORY PTE. LTD. LEGAL ENTITY". SGP Grid Official.
- ^ "The 30 largest accounting and advisory firms in Singapore". Consultancy Asia.
- ^ Kan, Francis (18 July 2013). "The ties that bind". TodayOnline.
- ^ CHARITY GOVERNANCE in Singapore (PDF). INSIGHTS ON CHARITY GOVERNANCE IN SINGAPORE. p. 14.
- ^ "RSM & STONE FOREST GROUP". Singapore Business Review.
- ^ "New member: RSM Risk Advisory". British Chamber of Commerce.
- ^ "RSM cracks $1 billion revenue barrier in Asia Pacific region". Consultancy Asia.
- ^ "Deloitte, KPMG in Singapore to raise starting salaries for some accounting roles". Business Times.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.