Draft:The Op Games
Submission declined on 9 June 2026 by JacobTheRox (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 5 May 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by ChrysGalley 3 months ago.
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Tarlby 4 months ago.
|
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Jlwoodwa 4 months ago.
|
Comment: Improvement has been made to the article since previous submission, but you still haven't really demonstrated that the company is notable. While some of its games are good, WP:NINHERITED makes it clear that the company must be notable in its own right. Unfortunately, while I appreciate you have worked hard on the article, I don't know if there is a serious path to the article space here, but I am declining instead of rejecting in good faith to give you another chance to find sources showing that the company is notable, not just because it has made certain board games. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 21:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Comment: For a company we need corporate depth. See WP:SIRS and the sections below on corporate depth and corporate trivia. For a product then WP:NPRODUCT would apply, however that is not the current basis of this draft. At the moment there are 4 sources, 3 of which are not helpful: PRNewswire is a press release circulation agency, the company itself is another source, and YouTube is self published. More information on this via WP:RSP. This leaves one source and it isn't possible to meet WP:SIRS with just one source. ChrysGalley (talk) 18:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
| Owner | Dane Chapin |
|---|---|
| URL | theop.games |
| Launched | 1994 |
The Op Games (or USAopoly) is a company that creates and publish board games and puzzles.[1]
History
[edit]The Op Games was founded in 1994 by Dane Chapin and his sisters. Its name was originally called USAopoly.[2] The company then became licensed with Hasbro to create and add city, video series, and other editions to the Monopoly game.[3] Soon, USAopoly began to create different versions of other board games such as Trivial Pursuit, Codenames, Munchkin,[4] Checkers, Backgammon, and Cluedo. In 2019, USAopoly changed its name to its current name, The Op Games.[2]
Board games
[edit]The following games that the Op Games have made include:
- 25 Words or Less
- Aqua[5]
- Blank State
- Dadada[6]
- Hues and Cues
- Qork[7]
- Tapple
- Telestrations
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ The Op Games Overview PitchBook. Retrieved 5 May 2026
- 1 2 Ritter, Victoria. "More Than Monopoly – How the OP Games connect players across ages and interest areas". Edplay. Retrieved 30 April 2026.
- ↑ Lee, Cora (4 November 2025). "Your TV-Show-Themed Board Game Was Probably Made in San Diego". Retrieved 6 May 2026.
- ↑ The Op Games: Our Story Retrieved 29 April 2026
- ↑ Aqua Biodiversity in the Oceans Review Board game Quest Retrieved 13 May 2026
- ↑ The Op Games SagaConcepts Retrieved 13 May 2026
- ↑ Qork The Toy Insider Retrieved 13 May 2026

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.