Talk:Avatar Studios

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 22:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Avatar Studios is developing three animated films set in the world of Avatar: The Last Airbender?

• Source: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/paramount-nickelodeon-avatar-films-1235165753/

• ALT1: ... that Avatar Studios, a production company dedicated to developing new projects set in the world of Avatar: The Last Airbender, was launched in 2021? Source: https://variety.com/2021/tv/news/avatar-last-airbender-legend-of-korra-nickelodeon-1234914149/
• Reviewed:

Created by Zingo156 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Zingo156 (talk) 16:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC).

• This looks on track. No QPQ required. Article meets requirements as far as length and sourcing. ALT1 will age a little better, but there might be a clearer way to phrase it. Did you want to take a shot at re-working it a bit? I don't mind trying to help. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
  • "Did you know that in 2021, Nickelodeon launched Avatar Studios to produce new projects set in the world of Avatar: The Last Airbender". Does that work? Zingo156 (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
    • That is much improved. Approving ALT1a:
      • ALT1a ... that in 2021, Nickelodeon launched Avatar Studios to produce new projects set in the world of Avatar: The Last Airbender?
    • Good work. Shooterwalker (talk) 20:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Shooterwalker, if you are approving this nomination, you need to use the appropriate icon to indicate this and so the bot can tell the review is complete. If you aren't, what else might need to be done? Have you completed the neutrality and copyvio checks? The hook sourcing check? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
        • My mistake, and I can give it the approval icon. I can confirm this meets all the requirements, including copyvio and WP:NPOV. I am standing by in case there is anything else. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
          • @Shooterwalker and Zingo156: not really meeting WP:DYKINT, to my mind. I won't be promoting this, and if others don't either this nomination will be rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

@Zingo156, Shooterwalker, AirshipJungleman29, and SL93: I was going to object to this hook in prep because I don't see how it is likely to be perceived as unusual or intriguing by readers, but I came here to see that Airship had already undone Shooterwalker's approval to lodge the exact same objection. SL93, please make sure to only promote approved hooks. Could a new hook be provided, please? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

• After taking a look at the article, there does not seem to be anything in the article that would make for a hook (other than maybe "that Paramount has established a production company to oversee the Avatar franchise", which I don't think would fly). As such, unfortunately as currently written the article appears not to be a good fit for DYK. Pinging the nominator Zingo156 for their input. I understand if this is a disappointing and unwelcome result and I hope this does not discourage you from contributing further to DYK. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)