Draft talk:Martin R. Schiller
Latest comment: 14 days ago by MartinRSchiller in topic regarding notablility
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
subjective manner
editThis article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. Please indicate an subjective wording. According the the descipition, the article appears factual. 70.173.150.32 (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- The article has now been approved by several people and appears factual. Please provide more details about any concerns in which the article is not facutual or is self promoting. 70.173.150.32 (talk) 14:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
regarding notablility
editThe investigators work has been routinely covered in main stream media. See https://www.heligenics.com/news for a sampling. MartinRSchiller (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- You have included 54 references to your own work, what are called primary references in Wikipedia. They do not count for notability, you cannot call yourself notable. Press releases by your company also don't count. Please read WP:NPROF. Also, an h-factor of 28 is low.
- The WP:ONUS is on you to prove notability in the article, without bragging (which is called WP:PEACOCK). I am doing you the curtesy of responding here as you are new to Wikipedia; most other volunteers will be less polite. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Dr. Schiller's research has been highlighed in many indpendent news articles.
- https://www.heligenics.com/news MartinRSchiller (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)