 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I am struggeling with understanding what is needed when it comes to overcoming the review remark "Insufficient significant independent coverage demonstrated." If there is a limited amount of independent sources actually "proving" all the details in the wiki text available online, what should in your opinion be done? In this case, is there a need to reference all the results compiled? Or is it the general information about the size of choir, the location, the founder, the conductors, or anything else? Or is it simply a question about credibility? Could you provide suggestion on what to improve, to have the text approved? @WikiDan61:
Start a discussion about improving the Draft:Pearls of the Sound page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Draft:Pearls of the Sound" page.
