Draft talk:Source Four
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No COF
editI do not have any affiliation with ETC Hugtrain (talk) 00:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- However I do need a lot more independent sources Hugtrain (talk) 14:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This is a Noteworthy Subject
editThe Source Four is a very popular light fixture in America. Almost any theater you walk into today will have these lights.
The previous article of the same name was deleted last year for being "unnoteworthy". I believe that the article was, in fact, promotional sounding, but I do not believe this warranted the entire deletion of it.
Yes, there are some primary sources and periodicals, but what do you expect? The New York Times writing a front page article about a stage lighting instrument? This isn't a random rock I found on the beach that I'm trying to pass off as important, it's a piece of history buried beneath some dirt that I'd like to preserve.
Please consider this before you make any quick judgment. Hugtrain (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)