The En-Gedi Scroll is an ancient Hebrew parchment found in 1970 at Ein Gedi, Israel. Radiocarbon testing dates the scroll to the third or fourth century CE (88.9% certainty for 210–390 CE), although there is disagreement over whether the evidence from the writing itself supports that date. The scroll was discovered to contain a portion of the biblical Book of Leviticus, making it the earliest copy of a Pentateuchal book ever found in a Torah ark.[1]
The deciphered text fragment is identical to what was to become, during the Middle Ages, the standard text of the Hebrew Bible, known as the Masoretic Text, which it precedes by several centuries. Damaged by a fire in approximately 600 CE, the scroll is badly charred and fragmented and required noninvasive scientific and computational techniques to virtually unwrap and read, which was completed in 2015 by a team led by Brent Seales of the University of Kentucky.[1]
Dating
editRadiocarbon dating at the Weizmann Institute of a charred fragment presumed to be from the scroll gave a C14 age of 1754±40 years.[2] The radiocarbon calibration curve of the time placed this in 235–340 CE with 68% probability and 210–390 CE with 89% probability.[2][3] This dating was challenged by Ada Yardeni, who proposed on the basis of letter shapes that the scroll should be dated to the second half of the first century CE or the beginning of the second.[4] Drew Longacre disputed Yardeni's analysis, arguing that it was misled by the paucity of comparative material from later centuries.[5] In Longacre's analysis, the paleographical evidence supported the radiocarbon date.[5]
Text
editThe innermost portion of the scroll contains a large blank area typically placed at the start of a scroll in order to protect it.[6] For this reason, the researchers concluded that Leviticus was the first book on the scroll and that at most three books of the Torah were originally present.[6] However, most of the scroll has been burnt away and only two columns of Leviticus were found.[6]
The text recovered consists of 18 complete lines and 17 partial lines of the first two chapters of Leviticus.[6] It is identical both in consonantal text and paragraph division to the Masoretic text as exemplified by the medieval Leningrad Codex.[6] This places it on equal footing with a handful of earlier manuscripts found in the Judean Desert but distinct from the Dead Sea scrolls found at Qumran.[6] If the radiocarbon date is correct, the scroll provides important evidence of the canonicalising of the masoretic text during a period from which textual evidence is almost non-existent.[6]
Gary A. Rendsburg noted that the researchers have concluded that by the fourth century CE, there was no halakhic rule prescribing that scrolls used for liturgical purposes must contain the entire Pentateuch, while other statements regarding when this rule came to be observed cannot be made with any degree of certainty.[7]
Discovery and recovery
editDiscovery
editThe En-Gedi Scroll was discovered in a 1970 excavation headed by Dan Barag and Ehud Netzer of the Institute of Archaeology at Hebrew University, and Yosef Porath of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) at the ancient synagogue in Ein Gedi in Israel,[8] the site of an ancient Jewish community. It was found in the burned remains of the ancient synagogue's Torah Ark.[9] Severely damaged by a fire around 600 CE, the scroll appeared as burned, crushed chunks of charcoal. Each disturbance caused the scroll to disintegrate, leaving few options for conservation or restoration. The scroll fragments were preserved by the IAA, although for decades after their discovery the scroll remains remained in storage due to their severely damaged condition.[2]
Recovery
editThe scroll's fragility led scientists to search for non-traditional techniques to reconstruct the text of the document virtually. This search led to the development of a virtual unwrapping technique developed by Prof. Seales of the University of Kentucky, which in 2015 allowed scientists to reveal the text contained in the scroll.[2]
The virtual unwrapping process begins with using X-ray microtomography (micro-CT) to scan the damaged scroll. This scan is non-invasive and uses the same technology as a traditional CT scan. Researchers used a high energy x-ray beam to pass through the depth of the scroll. Each material will absorb the x-ray radiation differently, whereby the scroll will absorb it minimally but more than the empty space around it, and the ink will absorb it significantly more than the unwritten scroll areas around it.[2][10]
This creates the sharp contrast we see between the text and the scroll in the final images. When the scroll completes a full rotation in regard to the x-ray source, the computer generates a 2D slice of the cross-section, and performing this iteratively allows the computer to build up a 3D volumetric scan describing the density as a function of the position inside the scroll. The only data needed for the virtual unwrapping process is this volumetric scan, so after this point the scroll was safely returned to its protective archive.[2]
The density distribution is stored by the computer with corresponding positions, called voxels or volume-pixels.[2] The goal of the virtual unwrapping process is to determine the layered structure of the scroll and try to peel back each layer while keeping track of which voxel is being peeled and what density it corresponds to. By transforming the voxels from a 3D volumetric scan to a 2D image, the writing on this inside is revealed to the viewer. This process happens in three steps: segmentation, texturing and flattening.
Segmentation
editThe first stage of the virtual unwrapping process, segmentation, involves identifying geometric models for the structures within the virtual scan of the scroll. Because of the extensive damage, the parchment has become deformed and no longer has a clearly cylindrical geometry. Instead, some portions may look planar, some conical, some triangular, etc.[11] Therefore, the most efficient way to assign a geometry to the layer is to do so in a piecewise fashion.[2]
Rather than modeling the complex geometry of the entire layer of the scroll, the piecewise model breaks each layer into more regular shapes that are easy to work with. This makes it easy to virtually lift off each piece of the layer one at a time. Because each voxel is ordered, peeling off each layer will preserve the continuity of the scroll structure.[2]
Texturing
editThe second stage, texturing, focuses on identifying intensity values that correspond with each voxel using texture mapping. From the micro-CT scan, each voxel has an associated brightness value that corresponds to a higher density. Since the metallic ink is denser than the carbon-based parchment, the ink will appear bright compared to the paper. After virtually peeling off the layers during the segmentation process, the texturing step matches the voxels of each geometric piece to their corresponding brightness value so that an observer is able to see the text written on each piece.[2]
In ideal cases, the scanned volume will match perfectly with the surface of each geometric piece and yield perfectly rendered text, but there are often small errors in the segmentation process that generate noise in the texturing process.[2] Because of this, the texturing process usually includes nearest-neighbor interpolation texture filtering to reduce the noise and sharpen the lettering.
Flattening
editAfter segmentation and texturing, each piece of the virtually deconstructed scroll is ordered and has its corresponding text visualized on its surface. This is, in practice, enough to ‘read’ the inside of the scroll, but for the arts and antiquities world, it is often best to convert this to a 2D flat image to demonstrate what the scroll’s parchment would have looked like if they could physically unravel without damage. This requires the virtual unwrapping process to include a step that converts the curved 3D geometric pieces into flat 2D planes. To do so, the virtual unwrapping models the points on the surface of each 3D piece as masses connected by springs where the springs will come to rest only when the 3D pieces are perfectly flat. This technique is inspired by the mass-spring systems traditionally used to model deformation.[2]
After segmenting, textualizing, and flattening the scroll to obtain 2D text fragments, the last step is a merge step meant to reconcile each individual segment to visualize the unwrapped parchment as a whole. This involves two parts: texture merging and mesh merging.
Texture merging
editTexture merging aligns the textures from each segment to create a composite. This process is fast and gives feedback on the quality of the segmentation and alignment of each piece. While this is good enough to create a basic image of what the scroll looks like, there are some distortions which arise because each segment is individually flattened. Therefore, this is the first step in the merging process, used to check if the segmentation, texturing, and flattening processes were done correctly, but does not produce a final result.[2]
Mesh merging
editMesh merging is more precise and is the final step in visualizing the unwrapped scroll. This type of merging recombines each point on the surface of each segment with the corresponding point on its neighbor segment to remove the distortions due to individual flattening. This step also re-flattens and re-textures the image to create the final visualization of the unwrapped scroll, and is computationally expensive compared to the texture merging process detailed above.
Using each of these steps, the computer is able to transform the voxels from the 3D volumetric scan and their corresponding density brightnesses to a 2D virtually unwrapped image of the text inside.[2]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b de Lazaro, Enrico (September 23, 2016). "En-Gedi Scroll Finally Deciphered". Sci-News.com. Retrieved 9 March 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Seales, W. B.; Parker, C. S.; Segal, M.; Tov, E.; Shor, P.; Porath, Y. (2016). "From damage to discovery via virtual unwrapping: Reading the scroll from En-Gedi". Science Advances. 2 (9): e1601247. Bibcode:2016SciA....2E1247S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1601247. PMC 5031465. PMID 27679821.
- ^ The 2020 calibration curve gives 243–350 CE with 68% probability and 234–405 CE with 95% probability.[1]
- ^ Segal, M.; Segal, E.; Seales, W.B.; Parker, C.S.; Shor, P.; Porath, Y.; Yardeni, A. (2016). "An Early Leviticus Scroll from En Gedi: Preliminary Publication" (PDF). Textus. 26: 29–58. doi:10.1163/2589255X-02601004.
- ^ a b Longacre, Drew (2018). "Reconsidering the Date of the En-Gedi Leviticus Scroll (EGLev): Exploring the Limitations of the Comparative-Typological Paleographic Method" (PDF). Textus. 27: 44–84. doi:10.1163/2589255X-02701004.
- ^ a b c d e f g Segal, M.; Segal, E.; Seales, W.B.; Parker, C.S.; Shor, P.; Porath, Y.; Yardeni, A. (2016). "An Early Leviticus Scroll from En Gedi: Preliminary Publication" (PDF). Textus. 26 (1): 29–58. doi:10.1163/2589255X-02601004.
- ^ Rendsburg, Gary A. (March 2018). "The World's Oldest Torah Scrolls". ANE Today. VI (3). American School of Oriental Research (ASOR). Archived from the original on 19 March 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
- ^ Harder, Whitney (September 22, 2016). "The scroll from En-Gedi: A high-tech recovery mission". Sci News.
- ^ Watts, James W (2017). Understanding the Pentateuch as a Scripture. John Wiley & Sons. p. 77. ISBN 9781405196383.
- ^ Baumann, Ryan; Porter, Dorothy; Seales, W. (2008). "The Use of Micro-CT in the Study of Archaeological Artifacts" (PDF). 9th International Conference on NDT of Art. Jerusalem, Israel, 25 - 30 May 2008. Retrieved 9 March 2024.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: location (link) - ^ Bukreeva, Inna; Alessandrelli, Michele; Formoso, Vincenzo; Ranocchia, Graziano; Cedola, Alessia (2017). "Investigating Herculaneum papyri: An innovative 3D approach for the virtual unfolding of the rolls". arXiv:1706.09883 [physics.ins-det].