Hyloidea is a superfamily of frogs.[1] Hyloidea accounts for 54% of all living anuran species.[2] The superfamily Hyloidea branched off from its closest relative, the Australobatrachia, during the mid-Cretaceous.[3] The fossil evidence found during the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event could not determine the effects upon the frogs, due to the lack of fossils. Increased forestation erupted after this extinction, possibly leading to more arboreal adaptations of these anurans to be best suited for this habitat.[4]
| Hyloidea Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Eleutherodactylus jasperi | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Amphibia |
| Order: | Anura |
| Suborder: | Neobatrachia |
| Superfamily: | Hyloidea Stannius, 1856 |
| Families | |
|
See text | |
Taxonomy
editHyloidea contains the following subgroups:[1][5][6]
- Alsodidae (Mivart, 1869) – (26 species)
- Batrachylidae (Gallardo, 1965) – (14 species)
- Bufonidae – true toads and harlequin frogs (700 species)
- Brachycephaloides
- Brachycephalidae (Günther, 1858) – saddleback toads, flea toads and big-headed frogs (79 species)
- Caligophrynidae Fouquet et al, 2023 (1 species)
- Ceuthomantidae – emerald-barred frogs Heinicke et al, 2009 (4 species)
- Craugastoridae (Hedges, Duellman, and Heinicke, 2008) – fleshbelly frogs, northern rain frogs, and robber frogs (129 species)
- Eleutherodactylidae (Lutz, 1954) – robber frogs (241 species)
- Neblinaphrynidae Fouquet et al, 2023 (1 species)
- Strabomantidae Hedges, Duellman, and Heinecke, 2008 (800 species)
- Centrolenids
- Allophrynidae (Savage, 1973) – Tukeit Hill frogs (3 species)
- Centrolenidae (Taylor, 1951) – glass frogs (155 species)
- Ceratophryidae (Tschudi, 1838) – common horned frogs, pacman frogs, and water frogs (12 species)
- Cycloramphidae (Peters, 1862) – glass frogs (36 species)
- Dendrobatoidea
- Dendrobatidae (Cope, 1865) – poison frogs (194 species)
- Aromobatidae (Grant, Frost, Caldwell, Gagliardo, Haddad, Kok, Means, Noonan, Schargel & Wheeler, 2006) – cryptic forest frogs (121 species)
- Hemiphractidae (Cope, 1865) – (112 species)
- Hylidae (Rafinesque, 1815) – tree frogs and leaf frogs (1036 species)
- Hylodidae (Günther, 1858) – (47 species)
- Leptodactylidae (Werner, 1896 (1838)) – southern frogs (206 species)
- Odontophrynidae ( Lynch, 1969) – (53 species)
- Rhinodermatidae (Bonaparte, 1850) – Darwin's frogs or mouth-brooding frogs (3 species)
- Telmatobiidae (Fitzinger, 1843) – water frogs (63 species)
Phylogenetic relationships
editAnurans all share a number of morphological characteristics, so researchers have had to use DNA testing to understand their relationships. ML and Bayesian analyses using a nuclear marker toolkit have resolved some of the relations of the anurans in Hyloidea. 53 out of the 55 previously established nodes on the phylogenetic tree were supported by this DNA testing.[2] Analysis supports the Hyloidea being the sister group to the Australobatrachia, a clade of frogs containing species in Chile, Australia, and New Guinea. The common ancestor of both groups inhabited South America during the Early Cretaceous.[7]
Shared characteristics
editHyloidea is the largest superfamily of anurans due to scientists placing frogs into this family when the relationships to others are unknown.[2] Therefore, Hyloidea has the highest species diversity. Hyloidea are all tailless, have shortened bodies, large mouths and muscular hind legs. Most anurans in the superfamily have a lateral‐bender which is a type of pelvis morphology found in walking, hopping and burrowing frogs. Some species that appear later in the taxon have a sagittal‐hinge pelvis found in aquatic frogs as well as walking, hopping and burrowing frogs and some have a fore–aft slider pelvis found in terrestrial frogs.[8] Hyloidea anurans lack ribs, have complex mouthparts, and their pectoral girdle can be arciferal or firmisternal.[9] They reproduce via axillary amplexus, and their larvae usually have a single spiracle. The average snout-vent length (SVL) of Hyloidea species vary widely, from 10 mm in one species of Diasporus to 320 mm in female Calyptocephalella gayi.[10]
Distribution
editIt is believed that Hyloidea frogs first evolved on the Gondwanan supercontinent in what is now southern South America. They soon spread throughout the world and resulted in many varities and species of frogs that adapted to their new environments. Due to the nature of their original environment, Hyloidea frogs are more associated with higher temperatures no matter where they are found in the world.[11][12] Today, they can be found in every continent except Antarctica, although in 2020 a roughly 40 million year old fossil from the hyloid family Calyptocephalellidae was discovered on Seymour Island in the Antarctic Peninsula.[13] The distribution of Hyloidea species is highly correlated with climate, with most species found in areas with higher annual mean temperatures.[14]
Conservation
editAs of March 2024, out over 50000 Hyloidea frogs represented on the IUCN Red List, 3866 were listed as critically endangered (4.5%), 5910 as endangered (6.8%), and 6774 as vulnerable (7.8%). However, there is still a great deal of the frogs, about 49000, that are considered as 'Least concern' and not being threatened. [15] Most of the frogs of greater concern are all undergoing habitat loss that contributes to their dwindling numbers. Some of the reasons why are due to urbanization, farming, mining, and deforestation.[15]
References
edit- ^ a b R.Alexander Pyron, John J.Wiens, 2011, A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-12-18. Retrieved 2013-04-22.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ a b c Feng, Yan-Jie; Blackburn, David C.; Liang, Dan; Hillis, David M.; Wake, David B.; Cannatella, David C.; Zhang, Peng (2017-06-28). "Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (29): E5864–E5870. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704632114. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5530686. PMID 28673970.
- ^ Feng, Yan-Jie; Blackburn, David C.; Liang, Dan; Hillis, David M.; Wake, David B.; Cannatella, David C.; Zhang, Peng (2017-07-18). "Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (29): E5864–E5870. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704632114. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5530686. PMID 28673970.
- ^ Meijer, Hanneke (2017-08-02). "Jump for joy: researchers make huge leap in understanding frog evolution". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-04-02.
- ^ The Amphibian Species of the World 6.0 website of the American Museum of Natural History's
- ^ Feng, Yan-Jie; Blackburn, David C.; Liang, Dan; Hillis, David M.; Wake, David B.; Cannatella, David C.; Zhang, Peng (2017-07-18). "Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (29): E5864–E5870. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704632114. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5530686. PMID 28673970.
- ^ Feng, Yan-Jie; Blackburn, David C.; Liang, Dan; Hillis, David M.; Wake, David B.; Cannatella, David C.; Zhang, Peng (2017-07-18). "Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (29): E5864–E5870. doi:10.1073/pnas.1704632114. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 5530686. PMID 28673970.
- ^ Jorgensen, M. E.; Reilly, S. M. (2013-05-01). "Phylogenetic patterns of skeletal morphometrics and pelvic traits in relation to locomotor mode in frogs". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (5): 929–943. doi:10.1111/jeb.12128. ISSN 1420-9101. PMID 23510149.
- ^ Duellman, W.E. "Anura". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
- ^ Vitt, Laurie; Caldwell, Janalee (2014). Herpetology: an introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles (4 ed.). Academic Press. p. 481,499. ISBN 978-0-12-386919-7.
- ^ Streicher, Jeffrey; Miller, Elizabeth; Guerrero, Pablo; Correa, Claudio; Ortiz, Juan; Crawford, Andrew; Pie, Marcio; Wiens, John (February 2018). "Evaluating methods for phylogenomic analyses, and a new phylogeny for a major frog clade (Hyloidea) based on 2214 loci". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 119: 128–143. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.10.013. PMID 29111477.
- ^ Fouquet, Antoine; Blotto, Boris; Maronna, Maximiliano; Verdade, Vanessa; Junca, Flora; de Sá, Rafael; Rodrigues, Miguel (May 2013). "Unexpected phylogenetic positions of the genera Rupirana and Crossodactylodes reveal insights into the biogeography and reproductive evolution of leptodactylid frogs". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 67 (2): 445–457. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.02.009. PMID 23454092.
- ^ Mörs, Thomas; Reguero, Marcelo; Vasilyan, Davit (23 April 2020). "First fossil frog from Antarctica: implications for Eocene high latitude climate conditions and Gondwanan cosmopolitanism of Australobatrachia". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 5051. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.5051M. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61973-5. PMC 7181706. PMID 32327670.
- ^ Duarte, L.D.S.; Both, C.; Debastiani, V.J.; Carlucci, M.B.; Gonçalves, L.O.; Seger, G.D.S.; Bastazini, G.; Brum, F.T.; Salengue, E.V.; Bernardo-Silva, J.S. (3 July 2013). "Climate effects on amphibian distributions depend on phylogenetic resolution and the biogeographical history of taxa". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 23 (2): 213–222. doi:10.1111/geb.12089.
- ^ a b "The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species". IUCN Red List. Retrieved 26 February 2021.