East Norfolk (UK Parliament constituency)
East Norfolk was a constituency in the county of Norfolk that returned two members of parliament to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1832 until 1868. It was re-established in 1885 with representation of one member. That seat was abolished in 1950.
East Norfolk | |
---|---|
Former county constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Norfolk |
1885–1950 | |
Seats | One |
Created from | North Norfolk and South Norfolk |
Replaced by | North Norfolk, South Norfolk, Central Norfolk and Great Yarmouth |
1832–1868 | |
Seats | Two |
Created from | Norfolk |
Replaced by | North Norfolk and South Norfolk |
History
editThe constituency was first created by the Great Reform Act for the 1832 general election, and abolished for the 1868 general election. In that period the Parliamentary County of Norfolk was split into two divisions – Eastern Norfolk and Western Norfolk, each returning two members.
Further to the Reform Act of 1867, Norfolk was reorganised into the North, South and West divisions, with each of the three divisions again returning two members. The Eastern division was replaced by the bulk of the North and South Divisions.
Under the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885, the three two-member county divisions were replaced with six single-member divisions. The second version of this constituency was one of the single-member seats. It was abolished under the Representation of the People Act 1948, which came into effect for the 1950 general election.
Boundaries and boundary changes
edit1832–1868
edit- The Hundreds of Blofield, Clavering, Depwade, Diss, Earsham, North Erpingham, South Erpingham, Eynesford, East Flegg, West Flegg, Forehoe, Happing, Henstead, Humbleyard, Loddon, Taversham, Tunstead and Walsham.[1]
1885–1918
edit- The Sessional Divisions of Blofield and Walsham, East and West Flegg, Taversham, and Tunstead and Happing;
- Part of the Sessional Division of South Erpingham; and
- The part of the Borough of Great Yarmouth in the county of Norfolk.[2]
As Great Yarmouth formed a separate Parliamentary Borough, only non-resident freeholders of the Borough were entitled to vote in this constituency.
1918–1950
edit- The Urban District of North Walsham; and
- The Rural Districts of Blofield, East and West Flegg, Loddon and Clavering, St Faith's, and Smallburgh.[3]
The division was expanded to the south, with the addition of eastern parts of the Southern Division (Loddon and Clavering Rural District). Also gained small area to the west from the Northern Division.
On its abolition, the contents of the seat were distributed as follows:
- North Walsham and the Rural District of Smallburgh to North Norfolk;
- area to the north and east of Norwich, mostly comprising the (former) Rural District of St Faiths, to the new constituency of Central Norfolk;
- most of the (combined) Rural District of Blofield and Flegg to the new county constituency of Yarmouth; and
- the Rural District of Loddon and Clavering (renamed Loddon) back to South Norfolk.
Members of Parliament
edit1832–1868
editElection | 1st member | 1st party | 2nd member | 2nd party | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1832 | William Windham | Whig[4][5] | Hon. George Keppel | Whig[6][7][8][4] | ||
1835 | Edmond Wodehouse | Conservative[4] | Horatio Walpole | Conservative[4] | ||
1837 | Henry Negus Burroughes | Conservative[4] | ||||
1855 | Sir Henry Stracey, Bt | Conservative | ||||
1857 | Charles Ash Windham | Whig[9] | Sir Edward Buxton, Bt | Whig[10][11][12] | ||
1858 | Hon. Wenman Coke | Whig[13][14][15] | ||||
1859 | Edward Howes | Conservative | Liberal | |||
1865 | Clare Sewell Read | Conservative | ||||
1868 | constituency abolished |
1885–1950
editYear | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
1885 | re-created but reduced to one member | ||
1885 | Sir Edward Birkbeck | Conservative | |
1892 | Sir Robert Price | Liberal | |
1918 | Michael Falcon | Unionist | |
1923 | Hugh Seely | Liberal | |
1924 | Reginald Neville | Unionist | |
1929 | William Lygon | Liberal | |
1931 | Liberal National | ||
1939 | Frank Medlicott | Liberal National | |
1950 | constituency abolished |
Elections
editDecades: |
Elections in the 1830s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | William Windham | 3,304 | 26.7 | ||
Whig | George Keppel | 3,261 | 26.3 | ||
Tory | Nathaniel Peach | 2,960 | 23.9 | ||
Tory | William Cholmondeley | 2,852 | 23.0 | ||
Majority | 301 | 2.4 | |||
Turnout | 6,229 | 88.5 | |||
Registered electors | 7,041 | ||||
Whig win (new seat) | |||||
Whig win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,482 | 27.6 | +3.7 | |
Conservative | Horatio Walpole | 3,196 | 25.3 | +2.3 | |
Whig | William Windham | 3,076 | 24.4 | −2.3 | |
Whig | Richard Hanbury Gurney | 2,866 | 22.7 | −3.6 | |
Majority | 616 | 4.9 | N/A | ||
Majority | 120 | 0.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,385 | 87.7 | −0.8 | ||
Registered electors | 7,281 | ||||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +3.3 | |||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +2.6 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,654 | 27.3 | −0.3 | |
Conservative | Henry Negus Burroughes | 3,523 | 26.3 | +1.0 | |
Whig | William Windham | 3,237 | 24.2 | −0.2 | |
Whig | Richard Hanbury Gurney | 2,978 | 22.2 | −0.5 | |
Majority | 286 | 2.1 | +1.2 | ||
Turnout | 6,759 | 81.0 | −6.7 | ||
Registered electors | 8,343 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | ±0.0 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +0.7 |
Elections in the 1840s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmond Wodehouse | 3,495 | 42.1 | +14.8 | |
Conservative | Henry Negus Burroughes | 3,434 | 41.3 | +15.0 | |
Whig | William ffolkes | 1,378 | 16.6 | −29.8 | |
Majority | 2,056 | 24.8 | +22.7 | ||
Turnout | c. 4,843 | c. 56.6 | c. −24.4 | ||
Registered electors | 8,556 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +14.9 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +15.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmond Wodehouse | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Henry Negus Burroughes | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 8,638 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Elections in the 1850s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmond Wodehouse | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Henry Negus Burroughes | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 8,216 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative hold |
Wodehouse resigned via accepting the office of Steward of the Manor of Hempholme, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Henry Stracey | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Charles Ash Windham | Unopposed | |||
Whig | Edward Buxton | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 7,755 | ||||
Whig gain from Conservative | |||||
Whig gain from Conservative |
Buxton's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Wenman Coke | 2,933 | 51.9 | N/A | |
Conservative | Henry Stracey | 2,720 | 48.1 | New | |
Majority | 213 | 3.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,653 | 72.9 | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 7,755 | ||||
Whig hold | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Wenman Coke | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Edward Howes | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 7,776 | ||||
Liberal hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Liberal |
Elections in the 1860s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Howes | 3,100 | 30.3 | N/A | |
Conservative | Clare Sewell Read | 2,985 | 29.2 | N/A | |
Liberal | Sir Thomas Proctor-Beauchamp, 4th Baronet | 2,150 | 21.0 | N/A | |
Liberal | Wenman Coke | 1,994 | 19.5 | N/A | |
Majority | 991 | 10.7 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,115 (est) | 64.4 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 7,939 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | N/A |
Elections in the 1880s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Birkbeck | 4,682 | 51.3 | ||
Liberal | Philip Falk | 4,440 | 48.7 | ||
Majority | 242 | 2.6 | |||
Turnout | 9,122 | 81.7 | |||
Registered electors | 11,161 | ||||
Conservative win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edward Birkbeck | 4,578 | 53.4 | +2.1 | |
Liberal | Henry Lee-Warner | 4,000 | 46.6 | −2.1 | |
Majority | 578 | 6.8 | +4.2 | ||
Turnout | 8,578 | 76.9 | −4.8 | ||
Registered electors | 11,161 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −2.1 |
Elections in the 1890s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 4,743 | 52.4 | +5.8 | |
Conservative | Edward Birkbeck | 4,303 | 47.6 | −5.8 | |
Majority | 440 | 4.8 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 9,046 | 92.2 | +15.3 | ||
Registered electors | 9,812 | ||||
Liberal gain from Conservative | Swing | +5.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 4,606 | 51.1 | −1.3 | |
Conservative | H. Rider Haggard | 4,408 | 48.9 | +1.3 | |
Majority | 198 | 2.2 | −2.6 | ||
Turnout | 9,014 | 83.2 | −9.0 | ||
Registered electors | 10,839 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −1.3 |
Elections in the 1900s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 4,563 | 55.0 | +3.9 | |
Conservative | William Louis St. John Prioleau | 3,733 | 45.0 | −3.9 | |
Majority | 830 | 10.0 | +7.8 | ||
Turnout | 8,296 | 76.9 | −6.3 | ||
Registered electors | 10,791 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +3.9 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 5,631 | 62.1 | +7.1 | |
Conservative | Sir Raymond Boileau, 4th Baronet | 3,435 | 37.9 | −7.1 | |
Majority | 2,196 | 24.2 | +14.2 | ||
Turnout | 9,066 | 80.7 | +3.8 | ||
Registered electors | 11,237 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +7.1 |
Elections in the 1910s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 5,592 | 56.3 | −5.8 | |
Conservative | Cecil Fitch | 4,348 | 43.7 | +5.8 | |
Majority | 1,244 | 12.6 | −11.6 | ||
Turnout | 9,940 | 86.0 | +5.3 | ||
Registered electors | 11,560 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | −5.8 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert Price | 5,265 | 57.7 | +1.4 | |
Conservative | Frank Meyer | 3,865 | 42.3 | −1.4 | |
Majority | 1,400 | 15.4 | +2.8 | ||
Turnout | 9,130 | 79.0 | −7.0 | ||
Registered electors | 11,560 | ||||
Liberal hold | Swing | +1.4 |
General election 1914–15:
Another general election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
- Liberal: Robert Price
- Unionist:
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Unionist | Michael Falcon | 7,030 | 44.9 | +2.6 |
Liberal | Fred Henderson | 6,691 | 42.8 | −14.9 | |
National Farmers Union | W. B. Taylor | 1,926 | 12.3 | New | |
Majority | 339 | 2.1 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 15,647 | 49.6 | −29.4 | ||
Registered electors | 31,578 | ||||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +8.8 | |||
C indicates candidate endorsed by the coalition government. |
Elections in the 1920s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Michael Falcon | 9,270 | 41.0 | −3.9 | |
Liberal | Hugh Seely | 8,962 | 39.7 | −3.1 | |
Labour | George Edward Hewitt | 4,361 | 19.3 | New | |
Majority | 308 | 1.3 | −0.8 | ||
Turnout | 22,593 | 70.2 | +20.6 | ||
Registered electors | 32,204 | ||||
Unionist hold | Swing | −0.4 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Hugh Seely | 11,807 | 49.6 | +9.9 | |
Unionist | Michael Falcon | 8,472 | 35.6 | −5.4 | |
Labour | George Edward Hewitt | 3,530 | 14.8 | −4.5 | |
Majority | 3,335 | 14.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 23,809 | 72.5 | +2.3 | ||
Registered electors | 32,845 | ||||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | +7.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unionist | Reginald Neville | 11,283 | 44.6 | +9.0 | |
Liberal | Hugh Seely | 9,114 | 36.0 | −13.6 | |
Labour | Reginald Barrington Bates | 4,907 | 19.4 | +4.6 | |
Majority | 2,169 | 8.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 25,304 | 75.6 | +3.1 | ||
Registered electors | 33,470 | ||||
Unionist gain from Liberal | Swing | +11.3 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | William Lygon | 13,349 | 39.6 | +3.6 | |
Unionist | Reginald Neville | 12,434 | 37.0 | −7.6 | |
Labour | Bill Holmes | 7,856 | 23.4 | +4.0 | |
Majority | 915 | 2.6 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 33,639 | 77.6 | +2.0 | ||
Liberal gain from Unionist | Swing | +5.6 |
Elections in the 1930s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Liberal | William Lygon | 25,945 | 79.8 | +42.8 | |
Labour | Bill Holmes | 6,562 | 20.2 | −3.2 | |
Majority | 19,383 | 59.6 | +57.0 | ||
Turnout | 32,507 | 71.7 | −5.9 | ||
National Liberal hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Liberal | William Lygon | 23,108 | 68.8 | −11.0 | |
Labour | Norman Reeve Tillett | 10,461 | 31.2 | +11.0 | |
Majority | 12,647 | 37.6 | −22.0 | ||
Turnout | 33,569 | 66.8 | −4.9 | ||
National Liberal hold | Swing | −11.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Liberal | Frank Medlicott | 18,257 | 62.9 | −5.9 | |
Labour | Norman Reeve Tillett | 10,785 | 37.1 | +5.9 | |
Majority | 7,472 | 25.8 | −11.8 | ||
Turnout | 29,042 | 53.1 | −13.7 | ||
National Liberal hold | Swing | −5.9 |
General election 1939–40
Until the parliament elected in 1935 was extended, another general election was required to take place before the end of 1940. The political parties made preparations for an election to take place, and by the autumn of 1939, the following candidates had been selected;
- Liberal National: Frank Medlicott
- Labour: Norman Reeve Tillett[25]
- Independent Conservative: James F. Wright (Secretary, Norfolk Farmers Union)
Elections in the 1940s
editParty | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
National Liberal | Frank Medlicott | 23,307 | 55.8 | −13.0 | |
Labour | Norman Reeve Tillett | 18,467 | 44.2 | +13.0 | |
Majority | 4,840 | 11.6 | −26.0 | ||
Turnout | 41,774 | 68.9 | +2.1 | ||
National Liberal hold | Swing | −7.1 |
References
edit- ^ "The statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. 2 & 3 William IV. Cap. LXIV. An Act to settle and describe the Divisions of Counties, and the Limits of Cities and Boroughs, in England and Wales, in so far as respects the Election of Members to serve in Parliament". London: His Majesty's statute and law printers. 1832. pp. 300–383. Retrieved 27 July 2017.
- ^ Great Britain, Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales. The public general acts. unknown library. Proprietors of the Law Journal Reports, 1884.
- ^ S., Craig, Fred W. (1972). Boundaries of parliamentary constituencies 1885–1972;. Chichester: Political Reference Publications. ISBN 0900178094. OCLC 539011.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h i Stooks Smith, Henry. (1973) [1844–1850]. Craig, F. W. S. (ed.). The Parliaments of England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. pp. 221–222. ISBN 0-900178-13-2.
- ^ "Admiral Lukin". National Trust. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- ^ Robbins, Alfred Farthing (1894). The Early Public Life of William Ewart Gladstone: Four Times Prime Minister. London: Methuen & Co. p. 179. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- ^ Chichester, Henry Manners (1892). . In Lee, Sidney (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 31. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
- ^ Gash, Norman (2013). Politics in the Age of Peel: A Study in the Technique of Parliamentary Representation, 1830–1850. Faber & Faber. p. 250. ISBN 9780571302901. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- ^ "Meetings of Liberal Electors St. Andrew's Hall". Norfolk News. 28 March 1857. p. 2. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Essex (South)". Bell's Weekly Messenger. 14 August 1847. p. 2. Retrieved 3 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Essex Standard". 13 August 1847. p. 3. Retrieved 3 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ Barrell, Helen (2016). Poison Panic: Arsenic Deaths in 1840s Essex. Barnsley: Pen and Sword Books. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-47385-207-5. Retrieved 3 August 2018 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Weston-super-Mare Gazette, and General Advertiser". 3 July 1858. pp. 2–3. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "Notes of the Week". Westmorand Gazette. 3 July 1858. p. 4. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ "East Norfolk Election". Dorset County Chronicle. 1 July 1858. p. 11. Retrieved 11 August 2018 – via British Newspaper Archive.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Craig, F. W. S., ed. (1977). British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885 (1st ed.). London: Macmillan Press. ISBN 978-1-349-02349-3.
- ^ a b c d e f g h British Parliamentary Election Results 1885–1918, FWS Craig
- ^ a b c d e f The Liberal Year Book, 1907
- ^ Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1886
- ^ Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1896
- ^ a b Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1901
- ^ a b Debrett's House of Commons & Judicial Bench, 1916
- ^ a b c d e f g h i British Parliamentary Election Results 1918–1949, FWS Craig (1983). Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. ISBN 0-900178-06-X.
- ^ Debrett's House of Commons and the Judicial Bench
- ^ Report of the Annual Conference 1939
- British Parliamentary Election Results 1832–1885, compiled and edited by F.W.S. Craig (The Macmillan Press 1977)