Talk:10 (1979 film)

Needs to be rewritten

This article needs a serious rewrite, especially the plot summary section. It's loaded with references to "hilarious scenes" and "use of subtle conversation" that make it sound more like a story than an encyclopedia article. I've never seen the movie, so will someone who has please do this? --FlamingSilmaril 18:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

I tried to get rid of the "hilarious" and "subtle" pov crap, but I haven't seen the movie either. Kweeket 18:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

THIS movie made a star of Julie Andrews? I'm sorry, but Julie Andrews was a star long before 1979. 71.115.236.84 (talk) 04:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Remake

Found a story about a remake but it was dated 2003. IMDB does still list a 10 remake as being in development by Blake Edwards but until a more without more recent article comes up it is maybe it is better not to include it in the article. -- Horkana (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Plot Synopsis

George met with the priest the day after his argument with Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 10 (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002061735/http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-10-best-lists-1967-present to http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-10-best-lists-1967-present
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cornrows.co.uk/cornrowsfaq.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.buzzle.com/articles/cornrow-braid-styles.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Corn rows "heavily criticized"

Neither of the sources cited criticize the use of corn rows or mention the term "cultural appropriation" at all. In fact, neither are news sources from the time of the film. They are FAQs for people interested in trying the hair style. This remark should be removed or if indeed she was "heavily criticized," whoever wrote this should find an actual source. 2600:1700:3520:1B70:25C8:44B2:49AC:C83D (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Agreed. I don't remember any such criticism from the time and this interview from Variety suggests that in fact the contemporary reaction from African American women was actually positive. JezGrove (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)