Talk:140 William Street, Melbourne

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Deor in topic Copyvio

Copyvio

edit

The recent additions to this article seem still to involve direct copying or unacceptably close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources, including the following:

  • The Victorian Heritage Database entry "Former BHP House". Examples: Much of the "Historical Significance" subsection, along with most of the fourth paragraph of the "Construction" section.
  • Goad's Melbourne Architecture, as quoted on [http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=632933 this page] (itself a copyvio), for example. Examples: Most of the first, third, and fifth paragraphs of the "Construction" section; some of the fourth paragraph as well.

I suspect that the material sourced to the magazine Architecture in Australia may also violate copyright, though I don't have access to the source to be sure. None of this material should be readded unless it can be confirmed to be expressed in a fashion that does not violate the copyright of others. Deor (talk) 16:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply