Talk:1962 FA Charity Shield
Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Rambling Man in topic GA Review
 | 1962 FA Charity Shield has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 29, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from 1962 FA Charity Shield appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Sources
editThe Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 15:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1962 FA Charity Shield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Shall be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- The title of the article should be included at the top of the infobox
Lead
edit- "and played between" - and was played
- "and late goals from John White and Terry Medwin sandwiched a Roy Stephenson consolation goal for Ipswich." - try not to use the word "sandwiched"
Pre-match
edit- Add a wikilink to the Second Division to the relevant article
- "Ipswich were managed by former Tottenham played" - player
- "and had beaten the London club" - how about defeated for variety?
- "Tottenham Hotspur had beaten Burnley 3–1 at Wembley" - {{xt|[[Wembley Stadium (1923)|Wembley Stadium}}
- "where they defeated a Football Association representative XI 3–2." - think you want to clarify that the XI was a team for the uninformed
Summary
edit- "and Smith struck to double Tottenham's lead," - struck the ball
- Done. Not as suggested, but tightened. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- What was Carberry's injury?
- It was apparently an ankle injury but I have no contemporaneous sources for that. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
References
edit- Reference 3 is dead and will need to be archived
- IABot smashed it. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- MWright96 addressed your concerns I hope. Responses all inline above. Thanks for the great review. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I have nothing more to raise in this review. I will promoting the article to GA class. MWright96 (talk)
- MWright96 addressed your concerns I hope. Responses all inline above. Thanks for the great review. Let me know if there's anything else I can do. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)