Talk:1972 Harlem mosque incident
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1972 Harlem mosque incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120622021117/http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/last_confession_9JHsGLxNvniKTGEDDzNxxM/1 to http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/last_confession_9JHsGLxNvniKTGEDDzNxxM/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1972 Harlem mosque incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513224514/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20120510/central-harlem/naming-street-for-cop-killed-at-mosque-could-open-old-wounds-locals-say to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20120510/central-harlem/naming-street-for-cop-killed-at-mosque-could-open-old-wounds-locals-say
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Seems one-sided
editSo, a fake call was made from a mosque for back-up. Responding officers were assaulted in what was CLEARLY a planned attack. Farrakhan and others threatened a riot if anyone was arrested, and promised to have those responsible turn themselves in. NO ONE was convicted, coz it probably would have been met with a DIFFERENT riot. It was NYPD and the Mayor's fault. Seems a little too cut-and-dried to me. And no one has bothered even commenting, talking or discussing. Just another one-sided piece of history, that no one DARES question. Cop answers a call and ends up dead, and it's HIS fault. Yeah, sure, whatever. Too disgusted to even suggest more research is needed.Jororo05 (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)