Talk:1982 Kiribati presidential election/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 07:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 10:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 10:41, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Initial comments

edit
  •   There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 12.3% in similarity.
  •   There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
  •   The article is stable.
  •   No previous GA reviews.

General comments

edit
  •   Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
    • No issues were found in the lede.
    • "A strike began in 1980, which eventually became violent" – "A strike began in 1980 that eventually became violent.
    • "Ratieta was the member of the parliament for Marakei who held..." – "Ratieta was the member of parliament for Marakei, who held..."
    • "...but was kept off of the ballot..." → but was kept off the ballot
    • "Since then, he had been the informal leader of the opposition" → change had to has
    • "...the post-independence economy brought a short-term stability..." → remove a from "a short-term stability"
    • "...showing favouritism toward the Kiribati Protestant Churc" → towards
  •   Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
  •   Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
    • References section with a {{reflist}} template is present in the article.
    • No referencing issues.
    • Listed references are reliable.
    • Spotchecked Ref 1, 3, 4, 5, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
    • Copyvio already checked.
  •   Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
    • Specify that South Tarawa is the capital of Kiribati.
    • Why did strikes take place?
    • The rest of the article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
  •   Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
    • The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
  •   Checking whether the article is stable.
    • As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
  •   Checking images.
    • Optional: Replace the blank image for Naboua Ratieta with 3x4.svg
    • Images are properly licensed.

Final comments

edit

@Thebiguglyalien: Good job on writing the article. Once these few issues get addressed, I'll be ready to promote the article to GA status. The review will be on hold for a week. It's cool to see that such countries like Kiribati are getting some recognition in the political area of Wikipedia. If you're interested, I have 7 GANs related to politics (6 of them are about Serbian politics) that are waiting to be reviewed by someone, so jump in and review an article for the GAN backlog if you want to. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 15:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vacant0, I don't want to change "had" to "has" because that would imply he's still in the position today. I've made all of the other changes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK, makes sense. Promoting. Vacant0 (talkcontribs) 23:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.