Talk:1992 Yugoslav People's Army column incident in Sarajevo

My recent edits

I have unintentionally removed the sentence It was one of the early major events of the Bosnian War, occurring as it did at the war's very beginning. with explanation biased, copy-pasted and somewhat contradictory to Attack on the JNA, Tuzla. Since the event from this article happened earlier than the Attack on the JNA, Tuzla, I think that it is more appropriate here than there, so I readded it and rephrased it. Now it sounds less biased I hope. My removal of {{original research}} tag may seem a little hasty - actually it was copy pasted from the summary in my identical edit on Attack on the JNA, Tuzla. {{NPOV}} tag is incomprehensible to me, because the article is written in unbiased tone - only the subject itself may seem disputable since it covers quite recent history. If you think otherwise, please comment here. --Biblbroks's talk 14:21, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:UCK NLA.jpg

Image:UCK NLA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

International Tribunal for Justice case

In section Controversy it says "In 2003 The International Tribunal for Justice dismissed the case...", but the Ejup Ganić article states "In 2003, allegedly, Office of Chief Prosecutor at International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague looked at the documents submitted by Republika Srpska prosecutor and decided not to pursue the case." It appears to me that there is some suspicion on whether the case was even started, or is it just the doubt in the reliability of the sources? Here are the links to them:

• The Christian Science Monitor: Serbia pursues Ejup Ganic for war crimes. Or is it a vendetta?
• VOA: Former Bosnian President to Stay in London Jail - this one was removed from Ejup Ganić (see [1]}

--Regards, Biblbroks (talk) 07:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

RfC: Should this article include a list of the names of the Yugoslav National Army soldiers killed?

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

There is consensus that "a list of the names of the Yugoslav National Army soldiers killed" should not be included. There is further consensus that an exception can be made in the event any individual persons are otherwise notable for reasons other than this incident. LavaBaron (talk) 07:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

---

Should the list of names of the Yugoslav National Army soldiers killed in this incident be listed in the article? Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose as per WP:NOTMEMORIAL -- Moxy (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose per WP:NOTMEMORIAL & WP:NEU. Providing a link to a reliable source that lists the names is fine, but to only include the names of the fallen from one belligerent and not the other IMHO raises flags.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose unless any of them are otherwise notable (normally indicated by having or qualifying for an individual wikipedia article). MilborneOne (talk) 15:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose, as described by the previous three commenters. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 06:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose per WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:UNDUE. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 06:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1992 Yugoslav People's Army column incident in Sarajevo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100619162403/http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/hr-rol/thedept/war-crime-tr/default.asp?content_id=6093 to http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/hr-rol/thedept/war-crime-tr/default.asp?content_id=6093

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)