Wikipedia

Talk:2001–02 Australian region cyclone season

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Depressions

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Should tropical lows be included in the article? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think you should include as many as possible. However, I don't recommend giving them infoboxes unless the writeup is long enough because too much whitespace can add some dings to the articles when they come up for FA. The current infobox is really huge and has major formatting problems in other basins. Of course, no season articles outside the Atlantic have made it to FA. Potapych (talk) 19:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
All tropical lows, in my opinion, should be listed in the article. Infoboxes can and should be included, however, as other basins use these too, esp. Atlantic, and there's no harm in doing so. I'll try to get this article to GA soon. RaNdOm26 (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "FebruaryASW" :
    • {{cite web| url=http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2002/summ0202.htm| title=Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary February 2002| accessdate=2008-07-20| author=Gary Padgett| year=2002| month=February}}
    • {{cite web | author=Gary Padgett | year=2002 | title=Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary February 2002 | url=http://www.australiansevereweather.com/cyclones/2002/summ0202.htm | accessdate=2008-04-28}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 19:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001–02 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2001–02 Australian region cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2001–02_Australian_region_cyclone_season&oldid=1211189463"