Talk:2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400
2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 4, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091112003313/http://www.nascar.com/2003/kyn/history/races/04/02/craven_busch_2003/index.html to http://www.nascar.com/2003/kyn/history/races/04/02/craven_busch_2003/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 12:13, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Lead
Ricky Craven ... started from the 32nd position
— The chart below says 31st.- Corrected MWright96 (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
It was Craven's ... final win of his career
— Not mentioned in the body.- Removed MWright96 (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's an interesting fact, you might actually consider adding it somewhere (e.g., "Craven earned his second (and ultimately last) career win"). But up to you.
- Removed MWright96 (talk) 19:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Infobox
|
---|
|
Background
|
---|
|
Practice and qualifying
|
---|
|
Race
|
---|
|
Post-race
|
---|
|
Overall
- Looks good, MWright96. A few more comments above. --Usernameunique (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, MWright96. Passing now. There's a comment above that you might consider, but certainly nothing to hold up the nomination. Again, feel free to drop me a line if you take this to FAC. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- ... that a finishing gap of 0.002 seconds at the 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 was the closest finish in NASCAR Cup Series history since the introduction of electronic scoring in 1993? Source: NASCAR's Busch and Craven Recall Darlington Finish 15 Years Later": The Drive & No denying Craven: No. 32 bumps off Busch at line": The Dayona Beach News-Journal
- ALT1:... that the 2003 Carolina Dodge Dealers 400 was the 100th NASCAR Cup Series race to be held at Darlington Raceway? Source: Darlington's 100th race may be its last in spring": Indianapolis Star
Improved to Good Article status by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:40, 4 April 2020 (UTC).
- Hmm, this looks familiar... GA, in time, long enough, sourced, no apparent copyvios, in-line hook citations check out, QPQ done. Strong preference for ALT0. MWright96, I've removed the "joint-" from "joint-closest finish"; "joint" might be appropriate if the hook were written in the present tense, but since the hook is written in the past tense—and the tie only happened later—it is not needed here. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Usernameunique, regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per WP:DYKSG#H2:
You're not allowed to approve your own hook or article, nor may you review an article if it's a recently listed Good Article that you either nominated or reviewed for GA (though you can still nominate it for DYK).
The idea is that a new reviewer might spot something that the original reviewer might have overlooked in their review (and indeed this has happened in the past). So we're going to need a fresh review by someone not involved with the GA review. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Usernameunique, regrettably, you are not an eligible reviewer for this nomination, since you were the reviewer at GAN per WP:DYKSG#H2:
- I will do a full review, due to the need for an independent reviewer
- Article is long enough (20338 characters), is a GA, nominated in time (GA on 9 April, nominated on 12 April) and article is within policy
- ALT0 is short enough, interesting, and well cited. ALT1 is far less interesting in my opinion, so I suggest we use ALT0
- QPQ done
- Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)