Talk:2005 Hyderabad Open

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Mr. Stradivarius on tour in topic Single article or multiple?

Proposed move to "2005 Hyderabad Open"

edit

Are there any objections to move this article to 2005 Hyderabad Open to match the naming pattern for other tennis tournaments? For example:

As an editor has already created an article at "2005 Hyderabad Open" we will need to do this as an administrative action. This will allow us to preserve the article history for this article and will delete the article, and its edit history, at "2005 Hyderabad Open." --Marc Kupper|talk 00:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

There should be no argument because, as you said, that is the standard way we do things on wikipedia...date first then tournament name... even the US Open pages are like that. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Admin, this is a request to move this article to 2005 Hyderabad Open. I believe there is complete agreement on the proposed article title. There may be disagreement about the article content as an editor had created an article at "2005 Hyderabad Open" and then made multiple attempts to redirect this article[1][2][3][4] to his/her version and then attempted to modify this article[5] (three edits in a two-minute span) into a stub that presumably would allow his/her version to be introduced. If you feel this would be better handled by a formal WP:RM then I'm fine with that. Thank you. --Marc Kupper|talk 19:49, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

I completed the page move after the target page was speedy deleted. Now we can think about whether we want to merge all the other articles too. Mr. Stradivarius 21:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Single article or multiple?

edit

Saihimesh has created three separate pages that cover aspects of this tournament

Presumably, a forth page will be created for 2005 Hyderabad Open – Doubles Qualifying

Saihimesh's presumed goal was to have this article only summarize the finals and that the details of the results would be on their own pages.

I personally am undecided on which format is "better" and if Wikipedia should even be used to document the details of a Tier IV. --Marc Kupper|talk 18:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

It seems like we'd run into notability issues with articles like 2005 Hyderabad Open – Singles Qualifying, although I think this might be a good place to bow to precedence. What do other tennis tournament articles do? Mr. Stradivarius 21:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I started a survey starting at 2005 WTA Tour but ran out of time. There is no consistent pattern. I given we are documenting the full draw I believe it's more readable to have them on separate pages. However, I don't see how this article passes WP:Sports event much less articles for each part of the draw. --Marc Kupper|talk 03:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree, separate articles are more readable, but I don't think any of them would pass muster at AfD. That said, I don't want to nominate them without going on a source hunt first, and it's entirely likely that there are sufficient sources in one of the Indian languages. Unless anyone else objects I'm happy to leave them the way they are, with the possible exception of the qualifiers article. Mr. Stradivarius on tour 06:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply