Talk:2008 FIFA Club World Cup

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Japan: Sport Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:58, December 12, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Sport task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Bracket is wrong

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bracket is wrong, winner of Play-off game will play against AFC Champions League Champion, not against Copa Libertadores winner LDU Quito. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.81.202.117 (talk) 06:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

OFC

There are now 5 clubs remaining in the OFC because the last place team in group A has no mathematical chance of winning that group, no matter what happens in the remaining games.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.24.44.188 (talk) 16:43, 20 February 2008

All of you seems are FORCING me quit or FORBIDDING me editing Wikipedia by IGNORING me, aren't you?

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What are all of you wanting? I have ask all of the contributors who know how to design to add the fifth-placed match, which is reintroduced this year, to the bracket template for not then ten times in these two months. However, my opinion is being ignored and removed, on today by a cleanup - Okay, tell me what do you want? I felt unrespected and furious now. Raymond "Giggs" K o 16:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're not being ignored. It just seems that no one knows how to fulfil your request. – Pee Jay 19:51, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Confusion

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding the very same cleanup noted in the above section, I would first like to address the issue that User:PeeJay2K3 has linked all the dates once again. Wikipedia:Mosnum has recently outlined new rules that dates will no longer be linked, so I will revert those changes. Regarding the J. League representative for the Club World Cup, it is clearly outlined below the qualifying teams that "If Gamba Osaka win the AFC CL, this spot will be taken by Adelaide United as the highest-placed non-Japanese team in the AFC CL." This means that it might not necessarily be a Japanese team that plays in the first play-off against Waitakerie United, therefore a Japanese flag icon should not be used. I will not revert PeeJay's changes to this until a consensus has been reached here, however I will fix the dates. Thanks, timsdad ^(talk) 00:35, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manchester United, titles

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

The FIFA Club World Cup is an entirely different competition to the Intercontinental Cup. I realise that the 2005 FIFA Club World Championship reads that Sao Paulo have their third title, as they won the Intercontinental Cup in 1992 and 1993, but 2007 FIFA Club World Cup reads that it's Milan's first title, even though they won the Intercontinental Cup in 1969, 1989 and 1990. I believe, even though the Intercontinental Cup merged with the Club World Championship and then merged into Club World Cup, they are still different competitions, and hold different titles.

This article should read that it's Manchester United's first title, and that the 2005 FIFA Club World Championship article should read that's it's Sao Paulo's first title also. --timsdad ^(talk) 03:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Intercontinental Cup is recognize by FIFA as the de-facto world championship. The only two things different from the IC and the CWC is that the CWC has a few extra matches and it is a different name. They both serve the same purpose : to decide a World Champion. I even provided a link by FIFA into United's win in 1999.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSonicx1986 (talk) 06:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I know that the competitions are very similar, that FIFA recognises them as the world championship and that Man U did win the 1999 Intercontinental Cup! The fact of the matter is, the title is FIFA Club World Cup 2008 Winners and it is Manchester United's first of that title!.

Besides, it only read that it was Sao Paulo's first title here because an editor changed it yesterday.

Also, please stop reverting my reversions until we come to a consensus here. The article must stay as it was before you changed it. --timsdad ^(talk) 04:04, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree with timsdad. Supersonicx1986, pretty much everything you say here is riddled with POV, when you should be dealing with absolute facts. The fact here is that the Club World Cup was established in 2000 and is a completely different competition to the Intercontinental Cup. Manchester United have only won the Club World Cup once. – Pee Jay 11:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Fifacwc08logo.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	An image used in this article, File:Fifacwc08logo.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2008 FIFA Club World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080314224518/http://www.fifa.com/clubworldcup/organisation/media/newsid=711059.html to http://www.fifa.com/clubworldcup/organisation/media/newsid=711059.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2008 FIFA Club World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic