Talk:2009 Makhachkala Il-76 collision

Latest comment: 1 month ago by GreenLipstickLesbian in topic Copyright problem removed

Old talk

edit

Keep - It's a plane crash. Obviously, you need to keep it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeGriffiths (talkcontribs) 08:45, January 16, 2009

missing

edit

Did they ever find the missing person? I would think so, Griffinofwales (talk) 02:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 Makhachkala Il-76 collision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20131203010251/http://ug.ria.ru/army/20110415/82119055.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply