Talk:2010 Cafés do Brasil Indy 300
2010 Cafés do Brasil Indy 300 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 16, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Cafés do Brasil Indy 300 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Cafés do Brasil Indy 300/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 02:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll give this a review shortly. Wizardman 02:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Images are all appropriately licensed and free. Will go sources and prose tomrrow; would've tonight but the wiki was down and didnt get to it. Wizardman 02:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources are good as well, though for the crash.net sources the author name should be added. Prose review to follow. Wizardman 13:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Lead is good, I'll read the rest over the weekend. Sorry for the delay, every time I put a couple hours aside something pops up. Wizardman 20:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Ok, here's what I found prose-wise:
- "Fourth-placed Scott Dixon" since a semicolon precedes it fourth should be lowercase.
- "Afte finishing third" After
- "Weather conditions at the start were clear but mild." clear and mild seem similar to me, so the but seems a bit jarring. am i missing something there?
Only a couple minor things found after a couple read-throughs. Article on hold and will pass when fixed. Wizardman 15:55, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Wizardman: Thank you for the review. All of the queries raised above have been actioned and have made some supplementary edits to the article. MWright96 (talk) 16:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Everything looks good, so the article passes. Wizardman 00:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)