Talk:2010 Kashmir unrest

Renaming the article

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was Closed as move. An editor performed the move and I've fixed it up. This may as well be closed. "unrest" is used rather than "Unrest". It is not a proper noun, and precedent supports non-capitalisation. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Quit Kashmir Movement (2010) → 2010 Kashmir Unrest — The use of 'Quit Kashmir Movement' is misleading since the movement is very vaguely defined and seldom used in the media. In accordance with the previous such incidents that have taken place, Eg: 2008 Tibetan unrest I propose the renaming of this article to 2010 Kashmir Unrest. --Johnxxx9 (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Then shouldn't sentence case be followed, i.e. 2010 Kashmir unrest (and as per others in Category:Ethnic riots). Severo^TC 10:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

oppose its a proper noun call akin to Everybody Draw Mohammad Day as oppose "Mohammed drawing controversy" (the latter beign wikipedia creations when an option does exist.Lihaas (talk) 09:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

• Support 2010 Kashmir Unrest would be more NPOV--Wikireader41 (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed move

To either 2010 Quit Kashmir Movement or Quit Kashmir Movement (2010) per WP:COMMON and WP:PRECISION.

The II in the title is not used anywhere but on Wikipedia, and most online sources refer to it as just the Quit Kashmir Movement. In order to avoid confusion with the earlier movement of 1931 (which, unfortunately does not have an article on Wikipedia yet), I propose that the year of the movement be used in the title, in either of the formats mentioned above. I'm personally in favour of the former, on the lines of 1984 anti-Sikh riots and 2008 Mumbai attacks. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Quit Kashmir Movement (2010)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Quit Kashmir Movement (2010)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "dawn.com":

• From Kashmir conflict: Kashmir policy: an overview by Shamshad Ahmad, Dawn 2004-08-05
• From Azad Kashmir: Naqash, Tariq (October 1, 2006). "'Rs1.25 trillion to be spent in Azad Kashmir': Reconstruction in quake-hit zone". Dawn. Muzaffarabad.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Quit kashmir movment?

What is this Quit movment, the whole page abt movment is created as a propaganda tool, no side has called it that and no reliable media source has calle dit quit kashmir movment. This is a Encyclopedia not a propaganda machine.Mdmday (talk) 20:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Please note that in the shuffle, this article has been separated from its article history and talk history which is still at Quit Kashmir movement. When a decision on the name is made, this needs to be set right. Wnt (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

No, I reverted the cut-and-paste move that was made yesterday, so the history is intact. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Quit movment?

What is this Quit movment, the whole page abt movment is created as a propaganda tool, no side has called it that and no reliable media source has calle dit quit kashmir movment. This is a Encyclopedia not a propaganda machine.Mdmday (talk) 20:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree. please see the proposed move above.--Wikireader41 (talk) 01:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Kashmir unrest --> Kashmir uprising

I think the proper description of the events should be as uprising, not unrest. The curfew was defied on a daily basis, symbols of state power were attacked and the protesters openly called for independence from Indian rule. The response of the government was fullscale unleashing of state power over the protesters. I am going to perform this edit. If anybody has different opinion, please respond115.251.32.181 (talk) 14:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

• oppose unrest is the neutral term, uprising is seperatist propaganda--DBigXray 10:30, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2010 Kashmir unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130523101719/http://www.kashmirobserver.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4863:hurriyat-g-launches-quit-kashmir-stir-with-hartal&catid=15:top-news&Itemid=2 to http://www.kashmirobserver.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4863:hurriyat-g-launches-quit-kashmir-stir-with-hartal&catid=15:top-news&Itemid=2
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=119238
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindu.com/2010/09/16/stories/2010091665151200.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Kashmir:-Muslims-try-to-burn-a-Christian-school-(only-in-name)-19476.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/09/18/Death-toll-100-in-Kashmir-demonstrations/UPI-20921284814518/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/rssfeed/india/Kashmir-crisis-Hurriyat-invited-to-meet-team-of-MPs/Article1-601516.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)