Talk:2010 Kraljevo earthquake
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 Kraljevo earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aid to Kraljevo
editIs it just me or is the "Aid to Kraljevo" section getting too long? BytEfLUSh (talk) 02:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, it is way too long. Organizations and people tend to send help after natural disasters, and I don't think this one is particularly notable. We should not keep this as a record of charity. No such user (talk) 07:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Serbia earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101104210304/http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb00009t6.php to http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb00009t6.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)