Wikipedia

Talk:2012–13 Chelsea F.C. season

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Community Tech bot in topic A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
Learn more about this page

Stop changing Hazard's assists to 5, penalties do NOT count as an assist !!!

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Yes, penalties do NOT count as assists. Check every RELIABLE database, Hazard has 3 assists in his first 2 games in Premier League. Penalties won do not count as assists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.177.70.64 (talk) 09:42, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Community Shield

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is the Community Shield classed by this article as a friendly? If the Community Shield is a friendly, then the UEFA Super Cup and the FIFA Club World Cup are friendlies too. This definitely needs changing. – PeeJay 12:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Key Events

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this is getting a bit excessive, let's try and trim this down. Krazytea(talk) 18:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Community Shield

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The reasoning for Torres not being included as joint top scorer is because the Community Shield isn't a competitive fixture. But since when was this the case? It's always been a competitive match, and is recorded in official statistics as such. Hence, appearances and goals recorded in it should be listed. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Totally agree with you. Maybe it's the most unimportant match of the season, maybe winning 10 Community Shields doesn't even compare to winning the league once, but it is A COMPETITIVE fixture, and the goals are counted. Yes, maybe the yellow and red cards are not counted, but it doesn't mean this is a friendly, after all a shield is given to the winning team. Both the goals must be counted, and the assist from Ramires, even the cards must be included (even though they didn't count). I already tried doing so, but all my edits were reverted with the explanation that "it is a friendly match"... --Snakeplissken21 (talk) 22:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

hazard assists

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why isn’t hazard listed as the first in the premiere league top assists list?

Iskánder Vigoa Pérez (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

First goal against Middlesbrough in FA Cup tie

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Different sources credit this goal to either Ramires or Fernando Torres. The majority seem to go with Torres, as do the club's official statistics, so I propose we go with that. *runs off and checks* Ah yes, and the BBC website has now changed from Ramires to Torres. Mjefm (talk) 21:19, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Starting XIs to be removed from Wikipedia?

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

This is clearly a matter where you should ask all the people who use Wikipedia everyday what they think; if some die-hard Wikipedia editors thinks it should be removed.

Make a poll with the options "yes", "no" and "no opinion" and close it in, say, three days time, and see what the outcome will be. If the majority says "yes" – then remove it. If not – keep it.

If Wikipedia is a democratic place I would expect it to be like this on matter like this one. – 62.50.178.88 (talk) 00:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

There have been discussions about it, and the conclusion multiple times has been to remove this part of articles. See [1], [2]], and [3]. EddieV2003 (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Not to mention that Wikipedia is not a democracy. Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 05:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Well that is disappointing. Most people don't have the time or interest to participate in all these discussions, or to keep updated on all of them – many people probably don't even know where to go to participate in these discussions.
How many people decided that this should be removed from Wikipedia for example? Probably less than 10 – I'm pretty confident it would have been a different outcome if all the people that uses Wikipedia had got to decide..
So in fact a few die-hard Wikipedia editors effectively runs the show – sounds pretty much like an oligarchy to me. I also noticed that this user pretty much behaves like a small Wiki king. This is quite evident here.
Wikipedia is a great site, but it looks like it has major structural problems, in my opinion. And that is, of course, very disappointing.
I'm sorry, but I probably won't contribute much more to this site if it operates as it looks like. – 62.50.178.88 (talk) 12:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
IP, you are more than welcome to join in the discussion [[WT:FOOTY], but I am afraid the consensus is pretty overwhelming. GiantSnowman 12:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2012–13 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on 2012–13 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2012–13 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012–13_Chelsea_F.C._season&oldid=1196628471"