Wikipedia

Talk:2012 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page


Locations of advisories

edit

IMD:

Main: Chief Meteorologist Feature and Forecast \\ Bulletin \\ Discussion/Outlook \\ Track \\ IMD website Shipping Bulletin \\ All India weather report
Other: Shipping Bulletin (1, 2) \\ Alternative Outlook \\ Archives

JTWC

Other: Storm 1 \\ Outlook \\ TCFA \\ Best Track
Archives: JTWC (WTIO PGTW)

No storms. Least active

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

The IMD website clearly says that. A situation like this has never been seen before. This will clearly be the least active, and the first inactive tropical cyclone season in known history...! --Anirudh Emani (talk) 05:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Source? and remember we cant add the speculation in.Jason Rees (talk) 13:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Wikipedia article on all monitored NIO seasons clearly says a situation like this has never been faced before. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
We cant rely on all of the monitored NIO seasons to be correct though - and looking through the IMD BT it appears that 1993 may not have had a storm before November.Jason Rees (talk) 14:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Until November, then.. :P --Anirudh Emani (talk) 15:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Lets see, my mind says something big will happen :P Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

A small bit of news

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

A small bit of news in a slow season. Pakistan Meteorological Department in its recent weather advisory (Issued on the 2nd of September) has suggested that in the next couple of weeks we might see something significant in the Bay of Bengal.
Quote: Met Office informed that Bay of Bengal, major feeder of monsoon currents, has become active and two weather systems are expected to develop in Bay of Bengal in next couple of weeks that would produce widespread rains in South Asia. Monsoon currents of moderate intensity are expected to penetrate continuously over upper parts of Pakistan in next couple of days that will grip most parts of Punjab & KP during mid week and Sindh & Eastern Balochistan during the weekend. The intensity of monsoon currents is very likely to increase from mid week. PMD Bulletin Looking at the latest advisories issued it seems the first of the weather system was much northerly, hence in-land and not a potential cyclone material, but if the predictions are correct then another system should form in the coming weeks, which might be the one to kick-start the season. Badkhan (talk) 12:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Well, IMD does have a bad habit of issuing advisories on inland systems. They call it Land Depressions. So it is possible that the system inland can start the already way below normal season. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, perhaps it is due to the rare uncanny resemblance of these in-land systems with cyclonic systems, for example if one is to look at the satellite pictures of the current weather system hovering over the Deccan plateau, one might mistake it for a cyclone with a quite visible spiral binding, but more importantly, in the past these 'Land Depression' have been known to generate (or regenerate) into cyclones once crossing the plateau. So maybe the term 'Land Depression' is somewhat erroneous but it is not that illogical to start issuing advisories on these systems that are judged to have the potential to become cyclones. Especially considering that the Arabian sea is smallish body of water hence cyclones here often do not give enough time to prepare and predict like the Cape Verde Hurricanes do, and even then, American meteorologist do keep an alert eye over the tropical waves forming over West African savannah. Badkhan (talk) 08:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Exactly! There is just not enough time to forecast/understand tropical cyclones in the North Indian Ocean. Probably, that's the reason not much is known about the way storms form in this region. So it is important to focus more on any potential system and issue advisories on these as they may develop into tropical cyclones as soon as they enter the water bodies. The system is located very close to the west Indian coast at the moment. If the system enters the Arabian Sea, it may become a tropical cyclone. So lets just wait and see. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

No storm season

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

There's no need for a crapy source! Just look! No storms yet! LOL if this season is totally out of storms! Hey, imagine, a cyclone season with no storms. This looks like the first one in recorded history!-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 12:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry but there is every need for a source saying that there have been no storms yet this season since encyclopedic content must be verifiable and wikipedia is not a reliable source. However if anything bar the NRL RBT can be found, i will be surprised.Jason Rees (talk) 21:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's a comment, not a request for the above satement.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 10:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mine was a comment in response to your one, reminding you off the rules of WP.Jason Rees (talk) 12:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, i don't know who made the page, but i think it's crazy.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 12:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

BOB 01

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

I see it added on the 2012 North Indian Ocean Cyclone Season page despite the fact that links were to only source on it being confirmed as a depression. It remained being called 94B Invest by everyone else. It needs to go back to 0 storms.--Playerstroke (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Actually since the IMD are in charge here, BOB 01 is counted as a weak TC.Jason Rees (talk) 01:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
The IMD is the official warning center as per the World Meteorological Organization, so we use them as the official source for storms in the North Indian. — Ines(talk) 11:44, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

(Playerstroke (talk) 02:31, 19 October 2012 (UTC))I am curious to see what happens in the next two months because if we see only 3 or 2 depressions this year then I believe it would make it the least active cyclone season recorded worldwide with satellite data.Reply

Tropical storm activity will increase as we reach the withdrawing stage of Monsoon. We just had Murjan, and we have a trough of low that may become a Low Pressure Area soon. Rishabh Tatiraju (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Names of North Indian Ocean Cyclones

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

The article 2012 North Indian Ocean cyclone season state under para on Storm Names "The next six names from the list of North Indian Ocean storm names are below. Murjan, Nilam (unused), Mahasen (unused), Phailin (unused), Helen (unused), Lehar (unused) How can Murjan be in the next six? Ugaap (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have added the caveat as of the start of 2012, though i cant see the point of the names remaining post January 1.Jason Rees (talk) 20:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
It would be better to keep the next six unused names instead of the caveat as of the start of 2012.Ugaap (talk) 21:41, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above issue has not been resolved. We should have the next six unused names. In the article on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_North_Indian_Ocean_cyclone_season we have names starting from Mahasen. Both the articles should have similar formats.Ugaap (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
The thinking behind the naming sections is always to have all the names used in a season and not just the next six unused names. Also the 2013 season will start with whatever name is next on the list at the end of 2012.Jason Rees (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

(comment)

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Well...3 storms did form so far, however this was an extremely, late starting season.-- ✯Earth100✯ ☉‿☉TalkContribs 13:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hope we find a source.. a damn source.. so that we can mention it in the article. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

yeah i agree.-- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ Talk Contribs 15:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Convection crossover to Bay of Bengal

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Someone need to correct the article on NILAM for date of crossover of area of convection to Bay of Bengal as 24th October instead of 23 October.

A usable reference needs to be found for the convection crossover.Jason Rees (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Do we have a usable reference for 23 October? the track map for 93W.INVEST has the timings of crossover.Ugaap (talk) 03:14, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Id rather see a written reference for the convection crossover full stop, otherwise we will have to remove it and hope that the IMD says something in Nilams TCR.Jason Rees (talk) 03:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
It could be removed till we get the written reference for crossover.Ugaap (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Above issue has not been resolved. Please help.Ugaap (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
I will take it out later when i update the article with the IMD's prem reports.Jason Rees (talk) 05:33, 7 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on 2012 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 33 external links on 2012 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012_North_Indian_Ocean_cyclone_season&oldid=1211190859"