Talk:2013 Bohol earthquake

Aftershocks

Either the 200 plus must be all be logged OR all just over a certain mark, like greater than a 4.5 must be here. No other Earthquake article has this. I will fix, but will not get into edit warring. So, we need User:Kristijh to keep this up to the minute. Kennvido

Although I originally tried to keep the article up to date and with that list written in prose, Kristijh has insisted on having it as a repetitive, and boring list [1] Maybe someone tell xyr to stop? Having a mention that several aftershocks of magnitude +x have occurred may be waaaaaaay better than having every single +5.0 aftershock listed and in a very ugly way. Regards, Küñall (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 16:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

---

2013 Philippine earthquake → 2013 Bohol earthquake – More specific name as per precedent of other earthquake article titles. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Epicenter

I am getting used to the news proclaiming something as stupid as "the epicenter was at a depth of x kilometers". But Wikipedia shouldn't distribute such nonsense. By definition, the epicenter is at the surface. 91.213.177.153 (talk) 06:29, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

This is true. Kennvido (talk) 07:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Strength of Earthquake

Need we use a comparison with an atomic bomb (in particular, the one dropped on Japan) to describe the strength of the earthquake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.142.235.128 (talk) 13:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Although the info is true, it is kinda sensationalistic. It would be good to have it removed. Küñall (talk) 23:54, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Agreed, it is WAY out of place, needs to be removed. Skycycle (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

New photo

Can someone update the intensity ShakeMap, since the one we have is the initial estimate at ~56km depth, later revised up to 20km and with a much larger intensity on Bohol - it can be found on the USGS website. Thanks in advance! Skycycle (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

• Here is the actual file - [2] Skycycle (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Corrected. Küñall (talk) 19:52, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Additional sections and expansion of the article

I have added new sections in the article. It requires expansion. Can you help me expand the article?--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:35, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Coordinate error

• . USGS http://comcat.cr.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usb000kdb4#summary. Retrieved 5 February 2014. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help) {{geodata-check}}

9.880°N, 124.117°E

—112.198.77.176 (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done. Deor (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Which source for the magnitude is more accurate?

United States Geological Survey and most international sources say 7.1 and PHIVOLCS says 7.2 Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 01:42, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

There will always be different calculations (different scales also) for magnitude so one way to approach it is to capitalize on the "problem" by finding multiple sources that are in agreement and build accuracy/trustworthiness that way. Dawnseeker2000 02:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Bohol earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131214193612/http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1108/NDRRMC%20Update%20SitRep%20no.%2035%20re%20Effects%20of%20M7.2%20Bohol%20EQ%2C%203Nov2013%2C%206AM.pdf to http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1108/NDRRMC%20Update%20SitRep%20no.%2035%20re%20Effects%20of%20M7.2%20Bohol%20EQ%2C%203Nov2013%2C%206AM.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Intensity

An editor keeps on changing the earthquake intensity to IX - Violent, based on info at List of earthquakes in 2013. Note however that this apparent discrepancy lies in the fact that 2 different scales are being used. The list article is based on Modified Mercalli intensity scale, whereas this article is based on PHIVOLCS Earthquake Intensity Scale. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Moreover, the intensity ratings at List of earthquakes in 2013 is totally unreferenced, and should therefore not be copied until a reliable source is added. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)