Talk:2013 Ecuadorian general election

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Maintenance Templates

edit

The prose is, to be blunt, awful, the sections on National political organizations is barely coherent English and needs to be re-worked by someone familiar with the situation. The lead does not sum up the subject of article, it make not attempt to cover the campaign or the Parliamentary Results, the Opinion Polling section needs to be expanded on or just removed. LGA (was LightGreenApple) talk to me 10:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vote totals

edit

In the section on the legislative election, the number of votes exceeds the voter turnout by an order of magnitude. Do voters get ten votes in Ecuadorian elections? If so, should the article explain this? Q·L·1968 23:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecuadorian general election, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply