Talk:2013 Tour de France/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Just some small things left to do:
- Race overview, first paragraph: On stage 2, I don't quite understand what you mean by Bakelants attack a late breakaway. Did he attack from a late breakaway or did he break from the peloton late?
- Second paragraph: How did Gerrans ensure the yellow jersey for Impey?
Good work! On hold for now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- Done both. BaldBoris 00:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Congrats, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)