 | 2015 Gent–Wevelgem has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 28, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from 2015 Gent–Wevelgem appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
_pictogram.svg){kind=small}
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Gent–Wevelgem/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Glad to do it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Made some minor changes. Other than that:
- The source for the result is formatted differently than with other races, so you should change it do create consistency.
- Also, it would be nice to read some reactions from riders about the result and the conditions.
That's about all that I can think of. Good job once more! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your edits. I've made Ypres/Ieper consistent: I don't much care which we use as long as it's consistent. I've added a rider reaction section. I haven't changed the citations style: per comments at WT:CYCLING I've changed to putting the citations with a
<ref>...</ref>and I'm going to make the other ones consistent at some point in the near future. I hope that's OK for now! Many thanks again, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)- Wonderful, a very good post-race section! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)