Talk:2015 Gent–Wevelgem/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Glad to do it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Made some minor changes. Other than that:

• The source for the result is formatted differently than with other races, so you should change it do create consistency.
• Also, it would be nice to read some reactions from riders about the result and the conditions.

That's about all that I can think of. Good job once more! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits. I've made Ypres/Ieper consistent: I don't much care which we use as long as it's consistent. I've added a rider reaction section. I haven't changed the citations style: per comments at WT:CYCLING I've changed to putting the citations with a <ref>...</ref> and I'm going to make the other ones consistent at some point in the near future. I hope that's OK for now! Many thanks again, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful, a very good post-race section! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)