This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Winter sports, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Winter sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Winter sportsTemplate:WikiProject Winter sportsWinter sports articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I suspect the importance rating for WP:ALASKA should also be revisited, though I've had little time for such activity as of late. This article is, and has been since its inception, a dumping ground for WP:ROUTINE sources because those sources were easy to obtain at the time they were added. It tells me little to nothing about what actually happened during this particular race. By virtue of the article's mere existence, it misleads the uninitiated into believing that there was something special about this particular race, while at the same time we're implying there was nothing special about truly historic races such as 1978 and 1985 because those articles don't exist. It pushes the encyclopedia further in the direction of being a current events or news site instead of "the sum of all human knowledge". In other words, why was this article even created? It serves no purpose other than to collect linkspam, which some people appear to believe is an appropriate function of Wikipedia. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
The short answer is nothing is being implied, go create the redlink article if you want, I'll accept "its a low quality article" as criticsim, and wont deny that fact as I am a poor writer, no, and, to further the sum of all human knowledge. I can write a more thorough opinion when I have the time to parse everything, but an AFD may be a more fitting venue for this.Thanks,L3X1◊distænt write◊19:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
